Paper · 2009 · Photosynthetica

Photosystem 2 is more tolerant to high temperature in apple (Malus domestica Borkh.) leaves than in fruit peel

L. S. Chen; L. Cheng

15
claims
30
verbatim quotes
94
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Tolerance of photosystem 2 (PS2) to high temperature in apple (Malus domestica Borkh. cv. Cortland) leaves and peel was investigated by chlorophyll a fluorescence (OJIP) transient after exposure to 25 (control), 40, 42, 44, and 46 °C in the dark for 30 min. The positive L-step was more pronounced in a peel than in leaves when exposed to 44 °C. Heat-induced K-step became less pronounced in leaves than in peel when exposed to 42 °C or higher temperature. Leaves had negative L-and K-steps relative to the peel. The decrease of oxygen-evolving complex (OEC) by heat stress was higher in the peel than in the leaves. OJIP transient from the 46 °C treated peel could not reach the maximum fluorescence (Fm). The striking thermoeffect was the big decrease in the relative variable fluorescence at 30 ms (VI), especially in the leaves. Compared with the peel, the leaves had less decreased maximum PS2 quantum efficiency (Fv/Fm), photochemical rate constant (KP), Fm and performance index (PI) on absorption basis (PIabs) and less increased minimum fluorescence (F0) and non-photochemical rate constant (KN), but more increased reduction of end acceptors at PS1 electron acceptor side per cross section (RE0/CS0) and per reaction center (RE0/RC0), quantum yield of electron transport from QA - to the end acceptors (ϕ R0) and total PI (PIabs,total) when exposed to 44 °C. In conclusion, PS2 is more thermally labile than PS1. The reduction of PS2 activity by heat stress primarily results from an inactivation of OEC. PS2 was more tolerant to high temperature in the leaves than in the peel.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The positive L-step was more pronounced in apple peel than in leaves after exposure to 44 °C

Material
Cortlande0
Organ / stage
peele0
Treatment
exposed to 44 °Ce1
Outcome
positive L-stepe1
Direction
more pronouncede1
Comparator
leavese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“apple (Malus domestica Borkh. cv. Cortland) leaves and peel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 56–115 · show in text ↑
e1

“The positive L-step was more pronounced in a peel than in leaves when exposed to 44 °C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 258–344 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The heat-induced K-step was less pronounced in apple leaves than in peel after exposure to 42 °C or higher

Organ / stage
leavese1
Treatment
exposed to 42 °C or higher temperaturee1
Outcome
Heat-induced K-stepe1
Direction
less pronouncede1
Comparator
peele1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“apple (Malus domestica Borkh. cv. Cortland) leaves and peel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 56–115 · show in text ↑
e1

“Heat-induced K-step became less pronounced in leaves than in peel when exposed to 42 °C or higher temperature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–455 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apple leaves had negative L- and K-steps relative to the peel

Organ / stage
leavese1
Outcome
L-and K-stepse1
Direction
negativee1
Comparator
peele1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“apple (Malus domestica Borkh. cv. Cortland) leaves and peel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 56–115 · show in text ↑
e1

“Leaves had negative L-and K-steps relative to the peel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 457–511 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The heat-stress decrease of the oxygen-evolving complex was higher in apple peel than in leaves

Organ / stage
peele1
Treatment
heat stresse1
Outcome
decrease of oxygen-evolving complex (OEC)e1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
leavese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“apple (Malus domestica Borkh. cv. Cortland) leaves and peel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 56–115 · show in text ↑
e1

“The decrease of oxygen-evolving complex (OEC) by heat stress was higher in the peel than in the leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–615 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The OJIP transient of apple peel treated at 46 °C could not reach the maximum fluorescence (Fm)

Organ / stage
peele1
Treatment
46 °Ce1
Outcome
OJIP transiente1
Qualifier
could not reach the maximum fluorescence (Fm)e1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“apple (Malus domestica Borkh. cv. Cortland) leaves and peel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 56–115 · show in text ↑
e1

“OJIP transient from the 46 °C treated peel could not reach the maximum fluorescence (Fm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–705 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative variable fluorescence at 30 ms (VI) showed a big decrease, especially in apple leaves

Organ / stage
leavese1
Outcome
relative variable fluorescence at 30 ms (VI)e1
Direction
decreasee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“apple (Malus domestica Borkh. cv. Cortland) leaves and peel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 56–115 · show in text ↑
e1

“The striking thermoeffect was the big decrease in the relative variable fluorescence at 30 ms (VI), especially in the leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–831 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 44 °C, apple leaves had less decreased Fv/Fm, KP and Fm than peel

Organ / stage
leavese1
Treatment
exposed to 44 °Ce1
Outcome
maximum PS2 quantum efficiency (Fv/Fm), photochemical rate constant (KP), Fme1
Direction
less decreasede1
Comparator
peele1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“apple (Malus domestica Borkh. cv. Cortland) leaves and peel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 56–115 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared with the peel, the leaves had less decreased maximum PS2 quantum efficiency (Fv/Fm), photochemical rate constant (KP), Fm and performance index (PI) on absorption basis (PIabs) and less increased minimum fluorescence (F0) and non-photochemical rate constant (KN), but more increased reduction of end acceptors at PS1 electron acceptor side per cross section (RE0/CS0) and per reaction center (RE0/RC0), quantum yield of electron transport from QA - to the end acceptors (ϕ R0) and total PI (PIabs,total) when exposed to 44 °C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 833–1367 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 44 °C, apple leaves had less decreased PIabs than peel

Organ / stage
leavese1
Treatment
exposed to 44 °Ce1
Outcome
performance index (PI) on absorption basis (PIabs)e1
Direction
less decreasede1
Comparator
peele1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“apple (Malus domestica Borkh. cv. Cortland) leaves and peel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 56–115 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared with the peel, the leaves had less decreased maximum PS2 quantum efficiency (Fv/Fm), photochemical rate constant (KP), Fm and performance index (PI) on absorption basis (PIabs) and less increased minimum fluorescence (F0) and non-photochemical rate constant (KN), but more increased reduction of end acceptors at PS1 electron acceptor side per cross section (RE0/CS0) and per reaction center (RE0/RC0), quantum yield of electron transport from QA - to the end acceptors (ϕ R0) and total PI (PIabs,total) when exposed to 44 °C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 833–1367 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 44 °C, apple leaves had less increased F0 and KN than peel

Organ / stage
leavese1
Treatment
exposed to 44 °Ce1
Outcome
minimum fluorescence (F0) and non-photochemical rate constant (KN)e1
Direction
less increasede1
Comparator
peele1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“apple (Malus domestica Borkh. cv. Cortland) leaves and peel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 56–115 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared with the peel, the leaves had less decreased maximum PS2 quantum efficiency (Fv/Fm), photochemical rate constant (KP), Fm and performance index (PI) on absorption basis (PIabs) and less increased minimum fluorescence (F0) and non-photochemical rate constant (KN), but more increased reduction of end acceptors at PS1 electron acceptor side per cross section (RE0/CS0) and per reaction center (RE0/RC0), quantum yield of electron transport from QA - to the end acceptors (ϕ R0) and total PI (PIabs,total) when exposed to 44 °C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 833–1367 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 44 °C, apple leaves had more increased reduction of PS1 end acceptors per cross section and per reaction center than peel

Organ / stage
leavese1
Treatment
exposed to 44 °Ce1
Outcome
reduction of end acceptors at PS1 electron acceptor side per cross section (RE0/CS0) and per reaction center (RE0/RC0)e1
Direction
more increasede1
Comparator
peele1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“apple (Malus domestica Borkh. cv. Cortland) leaves and peel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 56–115 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared with the peel, the leaves had less decreased maximum PS2 quantum efficiency (Fv/Fm), photochemical rate constant (KP), Fm and performance index (PI) on absorption basis (PIabs) and less increased minimum fluorescence (F0) and non-photochemical rate constant (KN), but more increased reduction of end acceptors at PS1 electron acceptor side per cross section (RE0/CS0) and per reaction center (RE0/RC0), quantum yield of electron transport from QA - to the end acceptors (ϕ R0) and total PI (PIabs,total) when exposed to 44 °C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 833–1367 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 44 °C, apple leaves had more increased electron-transport quantum yield (φR0) than peel

Organ / stage
leavese1
Treatment
exposed to 44 °Ce1
Outcome
quantum yield of electron transport from QA - to the end acceptors (ϕ R0)e1
Direction
more increasede1
Comparator
peele1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“apple (Malus domestica Borkh. cv. Cortland) leaves and peel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 56–115 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared with the peel, the leaves had less decreased maximum PS2 quantum efficiency (Fv/Fm), photochemical rate constant (KP), Fm and performance index (PI) on absorption basis (PIabs) and less increased minimum fluorescence (F0) and non-photochemical rate constant (KN), but more increased reduction of end acceptors at PS1 electron acceptor side per cross section (RE0/CS0) and per reaction center (RE0/RC0), quantum yield of electron transport from QA - to the end acceptors (ϕ R0) and total PI (PIabs,total) when exposed to 44 °C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 833–1367 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 44 °C, apple leaves had more increased total PI (PIabs,total) than peel

Organ / stage
leavese1
Treatment
exposed to 44 °Ce1
Outcome
total PI (PIabs,total)e1
Direction
more increasede1
Comparator
peele1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“apple (Malus domestica Borkh. cv. Cortland) leaves and peel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 56–115 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared with the peel, the leaves had less decreased maximum PS2 quantum efficiency (Fv/Fm), photochemical rate constant (KP), Fm and performance index (PI) on absorption basis (PIabs) and less increased minimum fluorescence (F0) and non-photochemical rate constant (KN), but more increased reduction of end acceptors at PS1 electron acceptor side per cross section (RE0/CS0) and per reaction center (RE0/RC0), quantum yield of electron transport from QA - to the end acceptors (ϕ R0) and total PI (PIabs,total) when exposed to 44 °C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 833–1367 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PS2 is more thermally labile than PS1 in apple

Outcome
PS2 is more thermally labile than PS1e1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“apple (Malus domestica Borkh. cv. Cortland) leaves and peel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 56–115 · show in text ↑
e1

“In conclusion, PS2 is more thermally labile than PS1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1369–1421 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heat-stress reduction of PS2 activity in apple primarily results from inactivation of the oxygen-evolving complex

Outcome
The reduction of PS2 activity by heat stresse1
Qualifier
primarily results from an inactivation of OECe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“apple (Malus domestica Borkh. cv. Cortland) leaves and peel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 56–115 · show in text ↑
e1

“The reduction of PS2 activity by heat stress primarily results from an inactivation of OEC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1423–1513 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PS2 was more tolerant to high temperature in apple leaves than in peel

Organ / stage
leavese1
Treatment
high temperaturee1
Outcome
tolerant to high temperaturee1
Direction
more tolerante1
Comparator
peele1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“apple (Malus domestica Borkh. cv. Cortland) leaves and peel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 56–115 · show in text ↑
e1

“PS2 was more tolerant to high temperature in the leaves than in the peel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1515–1587 · show in text ↑

heat · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 21 positive, 9 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.