Abstract
Olive trees grown in containers received outdoor winter chilling until February 27, 1969, then were moved to a greenhouse where several growth regulators were applied by dipping shoots into test solutions. Flowering was promoted by a growth retardant, B-9 (Alar-85) at 100 ppm, and was inhibited by either GA3 at 25 or 50 ppm or ABA at 10 or 50 ppm; in addition, ABA at 10 ppm stimulated lateral buds-normally flower buds-to grow vegetatively NAA at 50 ppm caused total inhibition of bud development. Cytokinin (6-benzylamino purine) at 50 or 250 ppm had no effect. Under noninductive conditions (trees held in a heated greenhouse throughout the winter months), repeated applications (twice a week for 10 weeks) of IAA, GA3, IAA + GA3, a mixture of GA4 and GA7, or ABA failed to substitute for the low-temperature requirement for flower induction, although GA3 strongly stimulated shoot growth.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 12
Claim · model-written summary
B-9 at 100 ppm promoted olive flowering.
- Taxon
- Olive
Olea europaeat0 - Treatment
- B-9 (Alar-85) at 100 ppme0
- Outcome
- Floweringe0
- Direction
- promotede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Olive (Olea Europaea L.)”
e0“Flowering was promoted by a growth retardant, B-9 (Alar-85) at 100 ppm”
Claim · model-written summary
GA3 at 25 or 50 ppm inhibited olive flowering.
- Taxon
- Olive
Olea europaeat0 - Treatment
- GA3 at 25 or 50 ppme0
- Outcome
- Floweringt0
- Direction
- inhibitede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Flowering Response of the Olive (Olea Europaea L.)”
e0“was inhibited by either GA3 at 25 or 50 ppm or ABA at 10 or 50 ppm”
Claim · model-written summary
ABA at 10 or 50 ppm inhibited olive flowering.
- Taxon
- Olive
Olea europaeat0 - Treatment
- ABA at 10 or 50 ppme0
- Outcome
- Floweringt0
- Direction
- inhibitede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Flowering Response of the Olive (Olea Europaea L.)”
e0“was inhibited by either GA3 at 25 or 50 ppm or ABA at 10 or 50 ppm”
Claim · model-written summary
ABA at 10 ppm stimulated lateral buds to grow vegetatively.
- Taxon
- Olive
Olea europaeat0 - Treatment
- ABA at 10 ppme0
- Outcome
- lateral budse0
- Direction
- stimulatede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Olive (Olea Europaea L.)”
e0“ABA at 10 ppm stimulated lateral buds-normally flower buds-to grow vegetatively”
Claim · model-written summary
NAA at 50 ppm completely inhibited olive bud development.
- Taxon
- Olive
Olea europaeat0 - Treatment
- NAA at 50 ppme0
- Outcome
- bud developmente0
- Direction
- total inhibitione0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Olive (Olea Europaea L.)”
e0“NAA at 50 ppm caused total inhibition of bud development.”
Claim · model-written summary
Cytokinin at 50 or 250 ppm had no effect on olive flowering or bud development.
- Taxon
- Olive
Olea europaeat0 - Treatment
- Cytokinin (6-benzylamino purine) at 50 or 250 ppme0
- Direction
- no effecte0
Not reportedComparatorOutcome
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Olive (Olea Europaea L.)”
e0“Cytokinin (6-benzylamino purine) at 50 or 250 ppm had no effect.”
Claim · model-written summary
Repeated IAA applications did not substitute for winter chilling in flower induction.
- Taxon
- Olive
Olea europaeat0 - Treatment
- IAAe0
- Outcome
- flower inductione0
- Direction
- failed to substitutee0
- Comparator
- low-temperature requiremente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Olive (Olea Europaea L.)”
e0“Under noninductive conditions (trees held in a heated greenhouse throughout the winter months), repeated applications (twice a week for 10 weeks) of IAA, GA3, IAA + GA3, a mixture of GA4 and GA7, or ABA failed to substitute for the low-temperature requirement for flower induction”
Claim · model-written summary
Repeated GA3 applications did not substitute for chilling in flower induction.
- Taxon
- Olive
Olea europaeat0 - Treatment
- GA3e0
- Outcome
- flower inductione0
- Direction
- failed to substitutee0
- Comparator
- low-temperature requiremente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Olive (Olea Europaea L.)”
e0“repeated applications (twice a week for 10 weeks) of IAA, GA3, IAA + GA3, a mixture of GA4 and GA7, or ABA failed to substitute for the low-temperature requirement for flower induction”
Claim · model-written summary
Repeated IAA plus GA3 did not substitute for chilling in flower induction.
- Taxon
- Olive
Olea europaeat0 - Treatment
- IAA + GA3e0
- Outcome
- flower inductione0
- Direction
- failed to substitutee0
- Comparator
- low-temperature requiremente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Olive (Olea Europaea L.)”
e0“repeated applications (twice a week for 10 weeks) of IAA, GA3, IAA + GA3, a mixture of GA4 and GA7, or ABA failed to substitute for the low-temperature requirement for flower induction”
Claim · model-written summary
Repeated GA4 and GA7 did not substitute for chilling in flower induction.
- Taxon
- Olive
Olea europaeat0 - Treatment
- a mixture of GA4 and GA7e0
- Outcome
- flower inductione0
- Direction
- failed to substitutee0
- Comparator
- low-temperature requiremente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Olive (Olea Europaea L.)”
e0“repeated applications (twice a week for 10 weeks) of IAA, GA3, IAA + GA3, a mixture of GA4 and GA7, or ABA failed to substitute for the low-temperature requirement for flower induction”
Claim · model-written summary
Repeated ABA did not substitute for chilling in flower induction.
- Taxon
- Olive
Olea europaeat0 - Treatment
- ABAe0
- Outcome
- flower inductione0
- Direction
- failed to substitutee0
- Comparator
- low-temperature requiremente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Olive (Olea Europaea L.)”
e0“repeated applications (twice a week for 10 weeks) of IAA, GA3, IAA + GA3, a mixture of GA4 and GA7, or ABA failed to substitute for the low-temperature requirement for flower induction”
Claim · model-written summary
GA3 strongly stimulated olive shoot growth under noninductive conditions.
- Taxon
- Olive
Olea europaeat0 - Treatment
- GA3e0
- Outcome
- shoot growthe0
- Direction
- strongly stimulatede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Olive (Olea Europaea L.)”
e0“although GA3 strongly stimulated shoot growth.”
The same questions in other papers
1-naphthaleneacetic acid · growth · Olea europaea (common olive)Positive and negative results
9 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →Gibberellic acid · phenology · Olea europaea (common olive)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- negative
Daminozide · phenology · Olea europaea (common olive)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
(+)-abscisic acid · phenology · Olea europaea (common olive)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- negative
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.