Paper · 1990 · New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science

Fruit colour responses of ‘Granny Smith’ apple to variable light environments

P. M. Hirst; D. S. Tustin; I. J. Warrington

10
claims
22
verbatim quotes
24
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Abstract Fifteen sequences of sunlight exposure and exclusion were imposed on fruit of ‘Granny Smith’ apple ( Malus domestica Borkh.) by covering individual fruit with opaque paper bags. Fruit were harvested at commercial maturity and fruit background colour, blush, soluble solids concentration, flesh firmness, and starch pattern index were measured. The following year, seven of the same sequences were repeated and fruit colour was measured at 10‐day intervals beginning from fruit drop until commercial harvest. A strong linear relationship between fruit colour lightness and hue (visually perceived colour) was evident in both years. Fruit became lighter as greenness decreased while an increasing yellowness only slightly increased lightness. Longer durations of light exclusion resulted in lighter coloured fruit, but for a given duration of shading, fruit exposed 1 month before harvest were lighter than fruit which remained shaded until harvest. All fruit became lighter in colour with time, although the rate at which fruit became paler was increased by profound shading. The incidence and severity of blush was highest on fruit from which light had been excluded for more than 2 months and then re‐exposed 1 to 2 months before harvest. Exclusion of light depressed the soluble solids concentration slightly, although flesh firmness and starch index were unaffected.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Longer durations of light exclusion produced lighter coloured apple fruit.

Taxon
Malus domesticaMalus domesticae0
Treatment
light exclusione1
Outcome
coloured fruite1
Direction
lightere1
Qualifier
Longer durationse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Malus domestica Borkh.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 110–132 · show in text ↑
e1

“Longer durations of light exclusion resulted in lighter coloured fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 750–820 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit exposed one month before harvest was lighter than fruit that remained shaded until harvest.

Taxon
Malus domesticaMalus domesticae0
Treatment
fruit exposed 1 month before harveste2
Outcome
coloured fruite1
Direction
lightere2
Qualifier
for a given duration of shadinge2
Comparator
remained shaded until harveste2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Malus domestica Borkh.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 110–132 · show in text ↑
e1

“Longer durations of light exclusion resulted in lighter coloured fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 750–820 · show in text ↑
e2

“for a given duration of shading, fruit exposed 1 month before harvest were lighter than fruit which remained shaded until harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 826–955 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All apple fruit became lighter in colour with time.

Taxon
Malus domesticaMalus domesticae0
Outcome
coloure3
Direction
lightere3
Qualifier
with timee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Malus domestica Borkh.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 110–132 · show in text ↑
e3

“All fruit became lighter in colour with time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 957–1001 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Profound shading increased the rate at which apple fruit became paler.

Taxon
Malus domesticaMalus domesticae0
Treatment
profound shadinge4
Outcome
rate at which fruit became palere4
Direction
increasede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Malus domestica Borkh.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 110–132 · show in text ↑
e4

“although the rate at which fruit became paler was increased by profound shading”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1003–1082 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blush incidence and severity were highest on fruit shaded for more than 2 months and then re-exposed.

Taxon
Malus domesticaMalus domesticae0
Treatment
light had been excluded for more than 2 monthse5
Outcome
incidence and severity of blushe5
Direction
higheste5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Malus domestica Borkh.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 110–132 · show in text ↑
e5

“The incidence and severity of blush was highest on fruit from which light had been excluded for more than 2 months”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1084–1198 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Light exclusion slightly depressed soluble solids concentration in apple fruit.

Taxon
Malus domesticaMalus domesticae0
Treatment
Exclusion of lighte6
Outcome
soluble solids concentratione6
Direction
depressede6
Qualifier
slightlye6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Malus domestica Borkh.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 110–132 · show in text ↑
e6

“Exclusion of light depressed the soluble solids concentration slightly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1249–1319 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Light exclusion left flesh firmness and starch index of apple fruit unaffected.

Taxon
Malus domesticaMalus domesticae0
Treatment
Exclusion of lighte6
Outcome
flesh firmness and starch indexe7
Direction
unaffectede7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Malus domestica Borkh.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 110–132 · show in text ↑
e6

“Exclusion of light depressed the soluble solids concentration slightly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1249–1319 · show in text ↑
e7

“flesh firmness and starch index were unaffected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1330–1377 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit colour lightness and hue of apple fruit showed a strong linear relationship.

Taxon
Malus domesticaMalus domesticae0
Outcome
linear relationship between fruit colour lightness and huee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Malus domestica Borkh.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 110–132 · show in text ↑
e1

“A strong linear relationship between fruit colour lightness and hue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 517–584 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lightness of apple fruit increased with increasing yellowness.

Taxon
Malus domesticaMalus domesticae0
Outcome
lightnesse1
Direction
increasede1
Qualifier
increasing yellownesse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Malus domestica Borkh.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 110–132 · show in text ↑
e1

“an increasing yellowness only slightly increased lightness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 690–748 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apple fruit became lighter as greenness decreased.

Taxon
Malus domesticaMalus domesticae0
Outcome
Fruit became lightere1
Direction
lightere1
Qualifier
as greenness decreasede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Malus domestica Borkh.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 110–132 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fruit became lighter as greenness decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 640–683 · show in text ↑

light · quality: sugar starch · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.