Paper · 1981 · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY

Water Relations of Cotton Plants under Nitrogen Deficiency

John W. Radin; Robert C. Ackerson

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
189
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Nitrogen nutrition exerted a strong effect on stomatal sensitivity to water stress in cotton. In well-watered plants grown with 0.31 millimolar N in the nutrient solution, stomata closed at a water potential of -9 bars even though the wilting point was below -15 bars. For each doubling of nutrient N level, the water potential for stomatal closure decreased by about 2 bars. Elevated intercellular CO(2) concentrations caused only slight stomatal closure regardless of N nutrition. Exogenous abscisic acid (ABA) greatly increased stomatal sensitivity to elevated CO(2) concentrations.PLANTS SUBJECTED TO WATER STRESS GAVE THE FOLLOWING RESPONSES: (a) decreased stomatal conductance at ambient external CO(2) concentration; (b) increased stomatal sensitivity to elevated CO(2) concentrations; (c) decreased mesophyll conductance to CO(2); and (d) increased endogenous ABA content. All of these responses to stress occurred at a higher water potential in N-deficient plants than in normal plants. The results show that N nutrition and water stress interact to control ABA accumulation and the events regulated by that accumulation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 0.31 millimolar N, well-watered cotton stomata closed at -9 bars while wilting occurred below -15 bars.

Treatment
0.31 millimolar Ne0
Outcome
stomata closed at a water potentiale0
Value
-9 barse0
Qualifier
wilting point was below -15 barse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In well-watered plants grown with 0.31 millimolar N in the nutrient solution, stomata closed at a water potential of -9 bars even though the wilting point was below -15 bars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 94–267 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Each doubling of nutrient N lowered the water potential for stomatal closure by about 2 bars.

Treatment
doubling of nutrient N levele0
Outcome
water potential for stomatal closuree0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
about 2 barse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For each doubling of nutrient N level, the water potential for stomatal closure decreased by about 2 bars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 269–374 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated intercellular CO2 caused slight stomatal closure regardless of N nutrition.

Treatment
Elevated intercellular CO(2) concentrationse0
Outcome
stomatal closuree0
Direction
slighte0
Qualifier
regardless of N nutritione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Elevated intercellular CO(2) concentrations caused only slight stomatal closure regardless of N nutrition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 376–481 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Exogenous ABA greatly increased stomatal sensitivity to elevated CO2.

Treatment
Exogenous abscisic acid (ABA)e0
Outcome
stomatal sensitivity to elevated CO(2) concentrationse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Exogenous abscisic acid (ABA) greatly increased stomatal sensitivity to elevated CO(2) concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 483–584 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress decreased stomatal conductance at ambient external CO2.

Treatment
WATER STRESSe0
Outcome
stomatal conductancee0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
ambient external CO(2) concentratione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PLANTS SUBJECTED TO WATER STRESS GAVE THE FOLLOWING RESPONSES: (a) decreased stomatal conductance at ambient external CO(2) concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–722 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress increased stomatal sensitivity to elevated CO2.

Treatment
WATER STRESSe0
Outcome
stomatal sensitivity to elevated CO(2) concentrationse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PLANTS SUBJECTED TO WATER STRESS GAVE THE FOLLOWING RESPONSES: (a) decreased stomatal conductance at ambient external CO(2) concentration; (b) increased stomatal sensitivity to elevated CO(2) concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–791 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress decreased mesophyll conductance to CO2.

Treatment
WATER STRESSe0
Outcome
mesophyll conductance to CO(2)e0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PLANTS SUBJECTED TO WATER STRESS GAVE THE FOLLOWING RESPONSES: (a) decreased stomatal conductance at ambient external CO(2) concentration; (b) increased stomatal sensitivity to elevated CO(2) concentrations; (c) decreased mesophyll conductance to CO(2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–837 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress increased endogenous ABA content.

Treatment
WATER STRESSe0
Outcome
endogenous ABA contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PLANTS SUBJECTED TO WATER STRESS GAVE THE FOLLOWING RESPONSES: (a) decreased stomatal conductance at ambient external CO(2) concentration; (b) increased stomatal sensitivity to elevated CO(2) concentrations; (c) decreased mesophyll conductance to CO(2); and (d) increased endogenous ABA content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–879 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–32 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress responses occurred at higher water potential in N-deficient cotton than normal plants.

Material
N-deficient plantse0
Outcome
water potentiale0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
normal plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All of these responses to stress occurred at a higher water potential in N-deficient plants than in normal plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 881–994 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–32 · show in text ↑

drought · physiology: gas exchange · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 3 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.