Paper · 2011 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

CHICKPEA RESPONSE TO TILLAGE SYSTEM AND PHOSPHORUS MANAGEMENT UNDER DRYLAND CONDITIONS

Amanullah Jan; Amanullah; Habib Akbar; et al.

5
claims
13
verbatim quotes
5
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field study was conducted at the Research Farm of NWFP, Agricultural University, Pakistan. Chickpea (Cicer aeritinum L.) cultivar, ‘Hassan-2000’, was sown as a winter crop under conventional tillage (CT) or no-tillage (NT) dryland systems in a randomized complete block design with split plot arrangement using four replications. Three levels of phosphorus (P; 0, 80 and 120 kg P2O5 ha−1) were broadcast applied at the time of last plowing and were thoroughly mixed in subplot size of 1.8 × 5 m. About 20% less weed biomass and 2% higher grain yield was recorded under CT than in NT. Plots supplied with P2O5 had higher value of the all the parameters under study except number of plant m−2 when compared with control (no P applied). However, the grain yield response to P beyond 80 kg ha−1 was not positive. CT + 80 kg P2O5 ha−1 was identified as the optimum level for maximum chickpea production under the existing dryland condition where application of herbicides in NT is not possible. Further experiments to study the optimization of P in chickpea production under dryland conditions are required.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage gave about 20% less weed biomass than no-tillage in chickpea under dryland conditions.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinume0
Material
Hassan-2000e0
Treatment
conventional tillage (CT)e0
Outcome
weed biomasse2
Direction
lesse2
Value
20%e2
Comparator
no-tillage (NT)e0
Setting
Research Farm of NWFP, Agricultural University, Pakistane1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chickpea (Cicer aeritinum L.) cultivar, ‘Hassan-2000’, was sown as a winter crop under conventional tillage (CT) or no-tillage (NT) dryland systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 93–240 · show in text ↑
e1

“A field study was conducted at the Research Farm of NWFP, Agricultural University, Pakistan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–91 · show in text ↑
e2

“About 20% less weed biomass and 2% higher grain yield was recorded under CT than in NT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 498–584 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage gave about 2% higher chickpea grain yield than no-tillage.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinume0
Material
Hassan-2000e0
Treatment
conventional tillage (CT)e0
Outcome
grain yielde2
Direction
highere2
Value
2%e2
Comparator
no-tillage (NT)e0
Setting
Research Farm of NWFP, Agricultural University, Pakistane1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chickpea (Cicer aeritinum L.) cultivar, ‘Hassan-2000’, was sown as a winter crop under conventional tillage (CT) or no-tillage (NT) dryland systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 93–240 · show in text ↑
e1

“A field study was conducted at the Research Farm of NWFP, Agricultural University, Pakistan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–91 · show in text ↑
e2

“About 20% less weed biomass and 2% higher grain yield was recorded under CT than in NT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 498–584 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus supply raised the parameters studied, except plant number per m2, relative to the no-P control in chickpea.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinume0
Material
Hassan-2000e0
Treatment
P2O5e3
Outcome
parameters under studye3
Direction
highere3
Qualifier
except number of plant m−2e3
Comparator
control (no P applied)e3
Setting
Research Farm of NWFP, Agricultural University, Pakistane1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chickpea (Cicer aeritinum L.) cultivar, ‘Hassan-2000’, was sown as a winter crop under conventional tillage (CT) or no-tillage (NT) dryland systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 93–240 · show in text ↑
e1

“A field study was conducted at the Research Farm of NWFP, Agricultural University, Pakistan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–91 · show in text ↑
e3

“Plots supplied with P2O5 had higher value of the all the parameters under study except number of plant m−2 when compared with control (no P applied)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 586–734 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage with 80 kg P2O5 ha−1 was identified as the optimum level for maximum chickpea production under existing dryland conditions.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
CT + 80 kg P2O5 ha−1e4
Outcome
optimum level for maximum chickpea productione4
Setting
existing dryland conditione4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chickpea (Cicer aeritinum L.) cultivar, ‘Hassan-2000’, was sown as a winter crop under conventional tillage (CT) or no-tillage (NT) dryland systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 93–240 · show in text ↑
e4

“CT + 80 kg P2O5 ha−1 was identified as the optimum level for maximum chickpea production under the existing dryland condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–936 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The chickpea grain yield response to phosphorus beyond 80 kg ha−1 was not positive.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
P beyond 80 kg ha−1e5
Outcome
grain yield response to Pe5
Direction
not positivee5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chickpea (Cicer aeritinum L.) cultivar, ‘Hassan-2000’, was sown as a winter crop under conventional tillage (CT) or no-tillage (NT) dryland systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 93–240 · show in text ↑
e5

“the grain yield response to P beyond 80 kg ha−1 was not positive”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–809 · show in text ↑

tillage · weed · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

tillage · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

97 papers: 79 positive, 18 negative or no effect

78 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

93 papers more in this group

See all 97 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.