Paper · 1995 · Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis

Response of rainfed bread and durum wheat to source, level, and timing of nitrogen fertilizer on two ethiopian vertisols. I. Yield and yield components

Tilahun Geleto; D.G. Tanner; Tekalign Mamo; et al.

10
claims
19
verbatim quotes
37
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract In trials conducted at two highland Vertisol sites in Ethiopia in 1990 and 1991, two locally popular spring bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and durum (T. durum Desf.) cultivars were supplied with nitrogen (N) fertilizer at 0, 60, and 120 kg N/ha in the form of large granular urea (LGU), standard urea prills, or ammonium sulfate. Nitrogen was applied all at sowing, all at mid‐tillering, or split‐applied between these two stages (1/3:2/3). Bread wheat exhibited the highest productivity and was the most responsive to applied N. Grain and biomass yields and most grain yield components were positively affected by increasing N rate and yield responses in each site‐season were economic up to the highest rate of N used in this study. Split application of N had a favorable effect on grain yield as did the use of LGU as the N source, particularly under conditions of severe water‐logging and at the high N rate. Split applications of N tended to nullify the positive effects of LGU, presumably by approximating the delayed release of N achieved with LGU. Grain yield was closely related to the number of grains/m2 and grains/spike.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bread wheat had the highest productivity among the wheat types tested.

Taxon
Bread wheatTriticum aestivume1
Outcome
productivitye1
Direction
higheste1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Bread wheat exhibited the highest productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 454–500 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bread wheat was the most responsive to applied N.

Taxon
Bread wheatTriticum aestivume1
Outcome
responsive to applied Ne2
Direction
most responsivee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Bread wheat exhibited the highest productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 454–500 · show in text ↑
e2

“was the most responsive to applied N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 505–541 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing N rate positively affected grain and biomass yields.

Treatment
increasing N ratee3
Outcome
Grain and biomass yieldse3
Direction
positivelye3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Grain and biomass yields and most grain yield components were positively affected by increasing N rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 543–645 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread and durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing N rate positively affected most grain yield components.

Treatment
increasing N ratee3
Outcome
grain yield componentse3
Direction
positivelye3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Grain and biomass yields and most grain yield components were positively affected by increasing N rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 543–645 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread and durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Split application of N had a favorable effect on grain yield.

Treatment
Split application of Ne4
Outcome
grain yielde4
Direction
favorable effecte4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Split application of N had a favorable effect on grain yield as did the use of LGU as the N source, particularly under conditions of severe water-logging and at the high N rate”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 748–924 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread and durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Use of LGU as the N source had a favorable effect on grain yield, particularly under severe water-logging and at the high N rate.

Treatment
use of LGU as the N sourcee4
Outcome
grain yielde4
Direction
favorable effecte4
Qualifier
particularly under conditions of severe water-logging and at the high N ratee4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Split application of N had a favorable effect on grain yield as did the use of LGU as the N source, particularly under conditions of severe water-logging and at the high N rate”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 748–924 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread and durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–41 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Split applications of N tended to nullify the positive effects of LGU.

Treatment
Split applications of Ne5
Outcome
positive effects of LGUe5
Direction
nullifye5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Split applications of N tended to nullify the positive effects of LGU, presumably by approximating the delayed release of N achieved with LGU”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–1067 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread and durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–41 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Split application approximates the delayed release of N achieved with LGU, presumably explaining the nullified LGU effect.

Treatment
Split applications of Ne5
Outcome
positive effects of LGUe5
Qualifier
approximating the delayed release of N achieved with LGUe5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Split applications of N tended to nullify the positive effects of LGU, presumably by approximating the delayed release of N achieved with LGU”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–1067 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread and durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–41 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield was closely related to the number of grains per square metre and grains per spike.

Treatment
number of grains/m2 and grains/spikee6
Outcome
Grain yielde6

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Grain yield was closely related to the number of grains/m2 and grains/spike”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1069–1144 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread and durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–41 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield responses were economic up to the highest N rate used in the study.

Outcome
yield responsese7
Qualifier
economic up to the highest rate of N used in this studye7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“yield responses in each site‐season were economic up to the highest rate of N used in this study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 650–746 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread and durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–41 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

1,736 papers in the same direction as this paper · 285 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
    Split N application increased 1000-kernel weight at two site-years.

    Timing and Level of Nitrogen Fertility Effects on Spring Wheat Yield in Eastern Canada · 1994 · compared with application of all the fertilizer N at seeding

    Same directionCited by this paper

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.