Paper · 2007 · Plant Biology

CASIROZ: Root Parameters and Types of Ectomycorrhiza of Young Beech Plants Exposed to Different Ozone and Light Regimes

P. Železnik; M. Hrenko; C. Then; et al.

16
claims
34
verbatim quotes
36
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Tropospheric ozone (O(3)) triggers physiological changes in leaves that affect carbon source strength leading to decreased carbon allocation below-ground, thus affecting roots and root symbionts. The effects of O(3) depend on the maturity-related physiological state of the plant, therefore adult and young forest trees might react differently. To test the applicability of young beech plants for studying the effects of O(3) on forest trees and forest stands, beech seedlings were planted in containers and exposed for two years in the Kranzberg forest FACOS experiment (Free-Air Canopy O(3) Exposure System, http://www.casiroz.de ) to enhanced ozone concentration regime (ambient [control] and double ambient concentration, not exceeding 150 ppb) under different light conditions (sun and shade). After two growing seasons the biomass of the above- and below-ground parts, beech roots (using WinRhizo programme), anatomical and molecular (ITS-RFLP and sequencing) identification of ectomycorrhizal types and nutrient concentrations were assessed. The mycorrhization of beech seedlings was very low ( CA. 5 % in shade, 10 % in sun-grown plants), no trends were observed in mycorrhization (%) due to ozone treatment. The number of Cenococcum geophilum type of ectomycorrhiza, as an indicator of stress in the forest stands, was not significantly different under different ozone treatments. It was predominantly occurring in sun-exposed plants, while its majority share was replaced by Genea hispidula in shade-grown plants. Different light regimes significantly influenced all parameters except shoot/root ratio and number of ectomycorrhizal types. In the ozone fumigated plants the number of types, number of root tips per length of 1 to 2 mm root diameter, root length density per volume of soil and concentration of Mg were significantly lower than in control plants. Trends to a decrease were found in root, shoot, leaf, and total dry weights, total number of root tips, number of vital mycorrhizal root tips, fine root (mass) density, root tip density per surface, root area index, concentration of Zn, and Ca/Al ratio. Due to the general reduction in root growth indices and nutrient cycling in ozone-fumigated plants, alterations in soil carbon pools could be predicted.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Beech seedling mycorrhization was about 5% in shade.

Taxon
beeche0
Outcome
mycorrhizatione0
Direction
very lowe0
Value
5 %e0
Qualifier
in shadee0

Verbatim

e0

“The mycorrhization of beech seedlings was very low ( CA. 5 % in shade, 10 % in sun-grown plants)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1145 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Beech seedling mycorrhization was 10% in sun-grown plants.

Taxon
beeche0
Outcome
mycorrhizatione0
Direction
very lowe0
Value
10 %e0
Qualifier
sun-grown plantse0

Verbatim

e0

“The mycorrhization of beech seedlings was very low ( CA. 5 % in shade, 10 % in sun-grown plants)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1145 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No ozone-related trends were observed in beech mycorrhization percentage.

Taxon
Beecht0
Treatment
ozone treatmente0
Outcome
mycorrhization (%)e0
Direction
no trendse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“no trends were observed in mycorrhization (%) due to ozone treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1147–1215 · show in text ↑
t0

“Beech”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cenococcum geophilum ectomycorrhiza numbers did not differ significantly among ozone treatments.

Taxon
Cenococcum geophilumCenococcum geophilume0
Treatment
different ozone treatmentse0
Outcome
number of Cenococcum geophilum type of ectomycorrhizae0
Direction
not significantly differente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenococcum geophilum
Cenococcum geophilum · TaxonCwfernandez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The number of Cenococcum geophilum type of ectomycorrhiza, as an indicator of stress in the forest stands, was not significantly different under different ozone treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1217–1389 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cenococcum geophilum predominated in sun-exposed beech plants.

Taxon
Cenococcum geophilumCenococcum geophilume0
Interactor
Beecht0host
Outcome
predominantly occurringe1
Qualifier
sun-exposed plantse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenococcum geophilum
Cenococcum geophilum · TaxonCwfernandez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cenococcum geophilum type of ectomycorrhiza”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1231–1274 · show in text ↑
e1

“It was predominantly occurring in sun-exposed plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1390–1442 · show in text ↑
t0

“Beech”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–67 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genea hispidula replaced the majority share of Cenococcum in shade-grown beech.

Taxon
Genea hispidulaGenea hispidulae0
Interactor
Beecht0host
Outcome
majority share was replaced by Genea hispidulae0
Qualifier
shade-grown plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Genea hispidula
Genea hispidula · TaxonGerhard Koller (Gerhard) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“while its majority share was replaced by Genea hispidula in shade-grown plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1444–1522 · show in text ↑
t0

“Beech”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Light regimes significantly influenced all assessed parameters except shoot/root ratio and ectomycorrhizal type number.

Taxon
Beecht0
Treatment
Different light regimese0
Outcome
all parameterse0
Qualifier
except shoot/root ratio and number of ectomycorrhizal typese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Different light regimes significantly influenced all parameters except shoot/root ratio and number of ectomycorrhizal types.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1524–1648 · show in text ↑
t0

“Beech”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ozone fumigation significantly lowered ectomycorrhizal type number relative to controls.

Taxon
Beecht0
Treatment
ozone fumigatede0
Outcome
number of typese0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
control plantse0

Verbatim

e0

“In the ozone fumigated plants the number of types, number of root tips per length of 1 to 2 mm root diameter, root length density per volume of soil and concentration of Mg were significantly lower than in control plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1649–1870 · show in text ↑
t0

“Beech”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ozone significantly lowered root tip numbers per length of 1 to 2 mm root diameter and root length density per soil volume.

Taxon
Beecht0
Treatment
ozone fumigatede0
Outcome
number of root tips per length of 1 to 2 mm root diameter, root length density per volume of soile0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
control plantse0

Verbatim

e0

“In the ozone fumigated plants the number of types, number of root tips per length of 1 to 2 mm root diameter, root length density per volume of soil and concentration of Mg were significantly lower than in control plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1649–1870 · show in text ↑
t0

“Beech”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ozone significantly lowered Mg concentration relative to controls.

Taxon
Beecht0
Treatment
ozone fumigatede0
Outcome
concentration of Mge0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
control plantse0

Verbatim

e0

“In the ozone fumigated plants the number of types, number of root tips per length of 1 to 2 mm root diameter, root length density per volume of soil and concentration of Mg were significantly lower than in control plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1649–1870 · show in text ↑
t0

“Beech”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root, shoot and leaf dry weights tended to decrease under ozone.

Taxon
Beecht0
Treatment
ozone-fumigatede1
Outcome
root, shoot, leaf, and total dry weightse0
Direction
decreasee0
Qualifier
Trendse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Trends to a decrease were found in root, shoot, leaf, and total dry weights”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1871–1946 · show in text ↑
e1

“ozone-fumigated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2201–2223 · show in text ↑
t0

“Beech”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total dry weight tended to decrease under ozone.

Taxon
Beecht0
Treatment
ozone-fumigatede1
Outcome
total dry weightse0
Direction
decreasee0
Qualifier
Trendse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Trends to a decrease were found in root, shoot, leaf, and total dry weights”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1871–1946 · show in text ↑
e1

“ozone-fumigated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2201–2223 · show in text ↑
t0

“Beech”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total root tip number, vital mycorrhizal root tip number and fine root mass density tended to decrease under ozone.

Taxon
Beecht0
Treatment
ozone-fumigatede1
Outcome
total number of root tips, number of vital mycorrhizal root tips, fine root (mass) densitye0
Direction
decreasee0
Qualifier
Trendse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Trends to a decrease were found in root, shoot, leaf, and total dry weights, total number of root tips, number of vital mycorrhizal root tips, fine root (mass) density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1871–2038 · show in text ↑
e1

“ozone-fumigated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2201–2223 · show in text ↑
t0

“Beech”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root tip density per surface and root area index tended to decrease under ozone.

Taxon
Beecht0
Treatment
ozone-fumigatede1
Outcome
root tip density per surface, root area indexe0
Direction
decreasee0
Qualifier
Trendse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Trends to a decrease were found in root, shoot, leaf, and total dry weights, total number of root tips, number of vital mycorrhizal root tips, fine root (mass) density, root tip density per surface, root area index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1871–2085 · show in text ↑
e1

“ozone-fumigated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2201–2223 · show in text ↑
t0

“Beech”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zn concentration and Ca/Al ratio tended to decrease under ozone.

Taxon
Beecht0
Treatment
ozone-fumigatede1
Outcome
concentration of Zn, and Ca/Al ratioe0
Direction
decreasee0
Qualifier
Trendse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Trends to a decrease were found in root, shoot, leaf, and total dry weights, total number of root tips, number of vital mycorrhizal root tips, fine root (mass) density, root tip density per surface, root area index, concentration of Zn, and Ca/Al ratio.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1871–2124 · show in text ↑
e1

“ozone-fumigated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2201–2223 · show in text ↑
t0

“Beech”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–67 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced root growth and nutrient cycling in ozone-fumigated plants could alter soil carbon pools.

Outcome
alterations in soil carbon poolse0
Qualifier
general reduction in root growth indices and nutrient cycling in ozone-fumigated plantse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Due to the general reduction in root growth indices and nutrient cycling in ozone-fumigated plants, alterations in soil carbon pools could be predicted.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2125–2277 · show in text ↑