Paper · 1988 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

The effect of gypsum on copper nutrition of wheat grown in marginally deficient soil

W. K. Gardner; A. Flynn

3
claims
7
verbatim quotes
9
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract This study reports an interaction between copper nutrition of wheat and application of gypsum. A pot experiment and two years of field trials on a sandy duplex soil in the southern Wimmera, Australia showed that the efficacy of copper applied to the soil is increased by the application of gypsum. Severity of attack by the fungus Gaeumannomyces graminis (take‐all) was greatly reduced in the pot experiment by the addition of either copper or gypsum to the soil. In the second year of the field experiments, copper deficiency occurred only on areas which had been ripped. These results are discussed in relation to factors controlling the availability of copper in soil. Key words: Coppergypsumwheattake‐all

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gypsum increased the efficacy of soil-applied copper in wheat.

Treatment
application of gypsume0
Outcome
efficacy of copper applied to the soile0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
sandy duplex soile2
Setting
southern Wimmera, Australiae2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the efficacy of copper applied to the soil is increased by the application of gypsum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 221–305 · show in text ↑
e1

“copper nutrition of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 51–76 · show in text ↑
e2

“a sandy duplex soil in the southern Wimmera, Australia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 154–208 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding copper greatly reduced take-all attack severity in the pot experiment.

Treatment
addition of either copper or gypsum to the soile0
Interactor
Gaeumannomyces graminisGaeumannomyces graminise0pathogen
Outcome
Severity of attack by the fungus Gaeumannomyces graminis (take‐all)e0
Direction
greatly reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Gaeumannomyces graminis
Gaeumannomyces graminis · InteractorWilliam M. Brown Jr. · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–49 · show in text ↑
e0

“Severity of attack by the fungus Gaeumannomyces graminis (take‐all) was greatly reduced in the pot experiment by the addition of either copper or gypsum to the soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 307–472 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the second field year, copper deficiency occurred only in ripped areas.

Treatment
rippede0
Outcome
copper deficiencye0
Qualifier
second yeare0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–49 · show in text ↑
e0

“In the second year of the field experiments, copper deficiency occurred only on areas which had been ripped.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 473–581 · show in text ↑

copper atom · Gaeumannomyces graminis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

lime · Gaeumannomyces graminis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

lime · control · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.