Paper · 2010 · Plant Disease

Effects of Silicon Applications on Soybean Rust Development Under Greenhouse and Field Conditions

E. M. Lemes; C. L. Mackowiak; A. Blount; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
66
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Soybean rust (SBR), caused by Phakopsora pachyrhizi, is one of the most destructive fungal diseases affecting soybean production. Silicon (Si) amendments were studied as an alternative strategy to control SBR because this element was reported to suppress a number of plant diseases in other host–pathogen systems. In greenhouse experiments, soybean cultivars inoculated with P. pachyrhizi received soil applications of wollastonite (CaSiO 3 ) (Si at 0, 0.96, and 1.92 t ha –1 ) or foliar applications of potassium silicate (K 2 SiO 3 ) (Si at 0, 500, 1,000, or 2,000 mg kg –1 ). Greenhouse experiment results demonstrated that Si treatments delayed disease onset by approximately 3 days. The area under disease progress curve (AUDPC) of plants receiving Si treatments also was significantly lower than the AUDPC of non-Si-treated plants. For field experiments, an average 3-day delay in disease onset was observed only for soil Si treatments. Reductions in AUDPC of up to 43 and 36% were also observed for soil and foliar Si treatments, respectively. Considering the natural delayed disease onset due to the inability of the pathogen to overwinter in the major soybean production areas of the United States, the delay in disease onset and the final reduction in AUDPC observed by the soil Si treatments used may lead to the development of SBR control practices that can benefit organic and conventional soybean production systems.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Greenhouse Si treatment delayed disease onset about three days.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
Si treatmentse0
Interactor
P. pachyrhiziPhakopsora pachyrhizie0pathogen
Outcome
disease onsete0
Direction
delayede0
Value
approximately 3 dayse0
Setting
greenhousee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In greenhouse experiments, soybean cultivars inoculated with P. pachyrhizi received soil applications of wollastonite (CaSiO 3 ) (Si at 0, 0.96, and 1.92 t ha –1 ) or foliar applications of potassium silicate (K 2 SiO 3 ) (Si at 0, 500, 1,000, or 2,000 mg kg –1 ). Greenhouse experiment results demonstrated that Si treatments delayed disease onset by approximately 3 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 314–686 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Greenhouse Si treatment significantly reduced disease progress relative to no Si.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
Si treatmentse0
Outcome
area under disease progress curve (AUDPC)e0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
non-Si-treated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The area under disease progress curve (AUDPC) of plants receiving Si treatments also was significantly lower than the AUDPC of non-Si-treated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–836 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field soil Si delayed disease onset by about three days.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
soil Si treatmentse0
Outcome
disease onsete0
Direction
delaye0
Value
3-daye0
Setting
field experimentse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For field experiments, an average 3-day delay in disease onset was observed only for soil Si treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–941 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field soil Si reduced disease progress by up to 43%.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
soile0
Outcome
AUDPCe0
Direction
Reductionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Reductions in AUDPC of up to 43 and 36% were also observed for soil and foliar Si treatments, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 943–1049 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field foliar Si reduced disease progress by up to 36%.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
foliar Si treatmentse0
Outcome
AUDPCe0
Direction
Reductionse0
Value
36%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Reductions in AUDPC of up to 43 and 36% were also observed for soil and foliar Si treatments, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 943–1049 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–42 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest soil Si may support soybean rust control practices.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Outcome
SBR control practicese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the soil Si treatments used may lead to the development of SBR control practices that can benefit organic and conventional soybean production systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1280–1429 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–42 · show in text ↑

silicon atom · Phakopsora pachyrhizi · Glycine max (soybean)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

silicon atom · disease · Glycine max (soybean)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

soil · disease · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

application · disease · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

54 papers: 46 positive, 8 negative or no effect

45 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
    Adding the inhibitor increased soybean leaf-tip necrosis.

    Phytotoxicity of foliar-applied urea · 1989 · compared with leaves fertilized with urea

    Opposite direction

  3. negative

50 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.