Paper · 2005 · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Interactive Responses of Gala Apple Fruit Volatile Production to Controlled Atmosphere Storage and Chemical Inhibition of Ethylene Action

James P. Mattheis; Xuetong Fan; Luiz C. Argenta

7
claims
8
verbatim quotes
107
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Gala apples exposed to the ethylene action inhibitor 1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP) for 12 h at 20 degrees C were stored at 1 degrees C in air or a controlled atmosphere (CA) maintained at 1 kPa O2 and 2 kPa CO2. Volatile compounds were measured after 4, 12, 20, and 28 weeks plus 1 or 7 days at 20 degrees C. Treatment with 1-MCP and then storage in air or CA or storage in CA without 1-MCP treatment reduced volatile production as compared to apples not treated with 1-MCP stored in air. The reduced production of esters, alcohols, aldehydes, acetic acid, and 1-methoxy-4-(2-propenyl)benzene was observed. Ester production by fruit stored in CA decreased throughout the storage period regardless of previous 1-MCP treatment. The production of esters, alcohols, aldehydes, acetic acid, and 1-methoxy-4-(2-propenyl)benzene by 1-MCP-treated fruit stored in air plus 7 days at 20 degrees C increased after 20 or 28 weeks of storage. Continuous exposure to 417 micromol m(-3) ethylene for 7 days at 20 degrees C after 12 or 28 weeks of storage stimulated production of many volatile compounds, primarily esters and alcohols, by fruit stored in CA or 1-MCP-treated apples stored in air. However, exposure to ethylene had no effect on the production of aldehydes or acetic acid.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1-MCP followed by air storage reduced Gala apple volatile production versus untreated air storage.

Treatment
Treatment with 1-MCP and then storage in aire0
Outcome
volatile productione0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
apples not treated with 1-MCP stored in aire0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment with 1-MCP and then storage in air or CA or storage in CA without 1-MCP treatment reduced volatile production as compared to apples not treated with 1-MCP stored in air”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 308–486 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1-MCP followed by CA storage reduced Gala apple volatile production versus untreated air storage.

Treatment
1-MCP and then storage in air or CAe0
Outcome
volatile productione0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
apples not treated with 1-MCP stored in aire0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment with 1-MCP and then storage in air or CA or storage in CA without 1-MCP treatment reduced volatile production as compared to apples not treated with 1-MCP stored in air”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 308–486 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CA storage without 1-MCP reduced Gala apple volatile production versus untreated air storage.

Treatment
storage in CA without 1-MCP treatmente0
Outcome
volatile productione0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
apples not treated with 1-MCP stored in aire0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“storage in CA without 1-MCP treatment reduced volatile production as compared to apples not treated with 1-MCP stored in air”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 362–486 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apple ester production decreased during CA storage regardless of prior 1-MCP treatment.

Taxon
fruite0
Outcome
Ester productione0
Direction
decreasede0
Setting
stored in CAe0

Verbatim

e0

“Ester production by fruit stored in CA decreased throughout the storage period regardless of previous 1-MCP treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 606–723 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Volatile production by 1-MCP-treated apples in air increased after 20 or 28 weeks plus seven days at 20 degrees C.

Taxon
fruite0
Treatment
1-MCP-treatede0
Outcome
production of esters, alcohols, aldehydes, acetic acid, and 1-methoxy-4-(2-propenyl)benzenee0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
after 20 or 28 weeks of storagee0
Setting
stored in air plus 7 days at 20 degrees Ce0

Verbatim

e0

“The production of esters, alcohols, aldehydes, acetic acid, and 1-methoxy-4-(2-propenyl)benzene by 1-MCP-treated fruit stored in air plus 7 days at 20 degrees C increased after 20 or 28 weeks of storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 725–927 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethylene exposure stimulated primarily ester and alcohol production after storage.

Treatment
Continuous exposure to 417 micromol m(-3) ethylene for 7 days at 20 degrees Ce0
Outcome
production of many volatile compounds, primarily esters and alcoholse0
Direction
stimulatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Continuous exposure to 417 micromol m(-3) ethylene for 7 days at 20 degrees C after 12 or 28 weeks of storage stimulated production of many volatile compounds, primarily esters and alcohols, by fruit stored in CA or 1-MCP-treated apples stored in air”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 929–1179 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethylene exposure did not affect apple aldehyde or acetic acid production.

Treatment
exposure to ethylenee0
Outcome
production of aldehydes or acetic acide0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, exposure to ethylene had no effect on the production of aldehydes or acetic acid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1270 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gala Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–35 · show in text ↑

1-methylcyclopropene · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

16 papers: 10 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

ethene · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

ethene · quality: phytochemicals · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

storage · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 9 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.