Paper · 1995 · Agronomy Journal

Alfalfa Establishment with Barley and Oat Companion Crops Differing in Stature

Steve R. Simmons; Craig C. Sheaffer; Donald C. Rasmusson; et al.

8
claims
19
verbatim quotes
47
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Small‐grain companion crops are commonly used for establishing forage legumes in the north‐central USA. Semidwarf‐stature barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.) and oat ( Avena sativa L .) show promise as less competitive and more lodging‐resistant companion crops. This study compared forage production and agronomic characteristics of companion‐cropped semidwarf and conventional‐stature genotypes of barley and oat. Alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.) was seeded both with and without companion crops in experiments conducted at St. Paul, MN, from 1987 through 1989 on a Waukegan silt loam soil (fine‐silty over sandy or sandy‐skeletal, mixed, mesic Typic Hapludoll). Both semidwarf and conventional‐stature barley and oat genotypes were evaluated. Small‐grain and alfalfa forage harvests were made at the boot and soft dough stages of the small grain. Subsequent alfalfa harvests also were made later in the establishment season and at first flower in the following spring. Light penetration through the canopies of the various companion crops was monitored in all years. Weed biomass was measured in 1989, to estimate weed suppression by the companion crops. Light intensity at the level of the alfalfa within the semidwarf companion crop canopy was consistently higher than within the conventional‐stature companion crops. Averaged over all small‐grain genotypes, companion crop treatments produced from 202 to 2355 kg ha −1 more forage dry matter than direct‐seeded alfalfa (no companion crop). Alfalfa dry matter production during establishment was suppressed by all companion crops, especially those with conventional stature. Weeds were greatly suppressed by all companion crops. Companion crops increased mortality of alfalfa plants during establishment, but did not lower production of the alfalfa at subsequent harvests in the establishment season or in the following spring. Overall, semidwarf and conventional barley and oat were comparable in performance as companion crops in these studies, but semidwarf genotypes should prove particularly advantageous under conditions where lodging is likely to occur.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Light intensity at alfalfa level was consistently higher within semidwarf companion crop canopies than within conventional-stature ones.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
semidwarf companion crop canopye0
Outcome
Light intensity at the level of the alfalfae0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
conventionale1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Alfalfa Establishment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–21 · show in text ↑
e0

“Light intensity at the level of the alfalfa within the semidwarf companion crop canopy was consistently higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1267 · show in text ↑
e1

“within the conventional”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1273–1296 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Companion crop treatments produced 202 to 2355 kg per hectare more forage dry matter than direct-seeded alfalfa without a companion crop.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
companion crop treatmentse0
Outcome
forage dry mattere2
Direction
moree2
Value
202 to 2355 kg hae0
Comparator
no companion crope1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Alfalfa Establishment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–21 · show in text ↑
e0

“companion crop treatments produced from 202 to 2355 kg ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1363–1420 · show in text ↑
e1

“no companion crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1475–1492 · show in text ↑
e2

“more forage dry matter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1424–1446 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alfalfa dry matter production during establishment was suppressed by all companion crops, especially conventional-stature ones.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
all companion cropse0
Outcome
Alfalfa dry matter production during establishmente0
Direction
suppressede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Alfalfa Establishment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–21 · show in text ↑
e0

“Alfalfa dry matter production during establishment was suppressed by all companion crops, especially those with conventional stature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1495–1627 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weeds were greatly suppressed by all companion crops.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
all companion cropse0
Interactor
Weedse0weed
Outcome
Weedse0
Direction
greatly suppressede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Alfalfa Establishment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–21 · show in text ↑
e0

“Weeds were greatly suppressed by all companion crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1629–1681 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Companion crops increased mortality of alfalfa plants during establishment.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
Companion cropse0
Outcome
mortality of alfalfa plantse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Alfalfa Establishment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–21 · show in text ↑
e0

“Companion crops increased mortality of alfalfa plants during establishment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1683–1757 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Companion crops did not lower alfalfa production at later harvests in the establishment season or the following spring.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
Companion cropse0
Outcome
production of the alfalfa at subsequent harvestse0
Direction
did not lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Alfalfa Establishment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–21 · show in text ↑
e0

“Companion crops increased mortality of alfalfa plants during establishment, but did not lower production of the alfalfa at subsequent harvests in the establishment season or in the following spring”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1683–1880 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Semidwarf and conventional barley and oat were comparable in performance as companion crops.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativat0
Outcome
performance as companion cropse0
Qualifier
semidwarf and conventional barley and oate0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Alfalfa Establishment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–21 · show in text ↑
e0

“semidwarf and conventional barley and oat were comparable in performance as companion crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1891–1982 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Semidwarf companion genotypes should be particularly advantageous where lodging is likely.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativat0
Outcome
particularly advantageouse0
Qualifier
under conditions where lodging is likely to occure0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Alfalfa Establishment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–21 · show in text ↑
e0

“semidwarf genotypes should prove particularly advantageous under conditions where lodging is likely to occur”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2005–2113 · show in text ↑

intercropping · pest · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

intercropping · weed · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

intercropping · growth · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 13 positive, 7 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

intercropping · yield · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

35 papers: 29 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
    Companion cropping raised seeding-year total dry matter yield to 26.37 Mg ha −1.

    Alfalfa establishment with sorghum–sudangrass as a companion crop · 2020 · compared with non‐weeded control (NWC) and weeded control (WC) alfalfa monoculture seeding treatments

    Opposite directionCites this paper

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.