Paper · 2015 · Idesia

Allelopathy of Crotalariajuncea L. aqueous extracts on germination and initial development of maize

Claudia Tatiana Araujo da Cruz-Silva; Ediane Becker Matiazzo; Fábio Palczewski Pacheco; et al.

8
claims
18
verbatim quotes
12
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the allelopathic potential of sunn hemp extracts on germination and initial development of maize. The trials were carried out in the laboratory and greenhouse with four concentrations (0; 7.5; 15 and 30%) of aqueous extracts obtained by grinding and leaching. In a germination chamber, more concentrated extracts (15% and 30%) inhibited maize germination, while shoot length (SL) was stimulated at 7.5% concentration. Ground extract stimulated root length (RL) at all tested concentrations. Root number (RN) was inhibited at higher concentrations of leached extract and stimulated for seeds exposed to sunn hemp ground extract. In the greenhouse, the longest root length (LRL) of maize was inhibited at the highest concentration (30%) of both extracts. The ground extract inhibited the LS in all concentrations and the 7.5% concentration stimulated the RN. It was concluded that sunn hemp extracts showed allelopathic effect on maize development, which varied according to how the extracts were obtained and concentrations used.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Extracts at 15% and 30% inhibited maize germination.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
more concentrated extracts (15% and 30%)e0
Outcome
maize germinatione0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–99 · show in text ↑
e0

“more concentrated extracts (15% and 30%) inhibited maize germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 330–398 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Extract at 7.5% stimulated maize shoot length.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
7.5% concentratione0
Outcome
shoot length (SL)e0
Direction
stimulatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–99 · show in text ↑
e0

“shoot length (SL) was stimulated at 7.5% concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 406–460 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ground extract stimulated maize root length at all tested concentrations.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Ground extracte0
Outcome
root length (RL)e0
Direction
stimulatede0
Qualifier
all tested concentrationse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–99 · show in text ↑
e0

“Ground extract stimulated root length (RL) at all tested concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 462–533 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher concentrations of leached extract inhibited maize root number.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
higher concentrations of leached extracte0
Outcome
Root number (RN)e0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–99 · show in text ↑
e0

“Root number (RN) was inhibited at higher concentrations of leached extract”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–609 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ground sunn hemp extract stimulated maize root number.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
sunn hemp ground extracte0
Outcome
Root number (RN)e1
Direction
stimulatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–99 · show in text ↑
e0

“stimulated for seeds exposed to sunn hemp ground extract”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 614–670 · show in text ↑
e1

“Root number (RN) was inhibited at higher concentrations of leached extract and stimulated for seeds exposed to sunn hemp ground extract”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–670 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 30%, both extracts inhibited longest maize root length in the greenhouse.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
both extractse0
Outcome
longest root length (LRL) of maizee0
Direction
inhibitede0
Qualifier
highest concentration (30%)e0
Setting
greenhousee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–99 · show in text ↑
e0

“In the greenhouse, the longest root length (LRL) of maize was inhibited at the highest concentration (30%) of both extracts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–795 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ground extract inhibited maize LS at all concentrations.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
ground extracte0
Outcome
LSe0
Direction
inhibitede0
Qualifier
all concentrationse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–99 · show in text ↑
e0

“The ground extract inhibited the LS in all concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 797–854 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ground extract at 7.5% stimulated maize root number in the greenhouse.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
ground extracte1
Outcome
RNe0
Direction
stimulatede0
Qualifier
7.5% concentratione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–99 · show in text ↑
e0

“the 7.5% concentration stimulated the RN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 859–899 · show in text ↑
e1

“The ground extract inhibited the LS in all concentrations and the 7.5% concentration stimulated the RN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 797–899 · show in text ↑

Crotalaria juncea · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 6 positive, 3 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

botanical · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

340 papers: 198 positive, 142 negative or no effect

197 papers in the same direction as this paper · 140 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

336 papers more in this group

See all 340 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.