Paper · 1996 · Biologia Plantarum

Chlorophyll fluorescence and anthocyanin content in chilled maize plants after return to a non- chilling temperature under various irradiances

T. Janda; G. Szalai; E. Páldi

2
claims
6
verbatim quotes
24
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The effect of irradiance on the ratio of variable to maximum fluorescence (Fv/Fm) and on the anthocyanin content of chilled (0.5 °C) young maize plants was investigated after returning the plants to a non-chilling temperature (25 °C). Compared to control plants grown throughout at 25 °C in the light, the Fv/Fm hardly changed during chilling or when returned to a non-chilling temperature in the dark, but there was a decrease in this parameter if the plants were shifted to the light after the cold treatment. Similarly, compared to the control plants there was no change in the anthocyanin content either at low temperature or after transfer to 25 °C in the dark. However, there was a sudden increase in the anthocyanin level after returning the plants from dark cold conditions to a non-chilling temperature in the light.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fv/Fm of chilled maize plants decreased when plants were shifted to the light after the cold treatment, compared with controls grown at 25 degrees; it hardly changed in the dark.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
shifted to the light after the cold treatmente2
Outcome
Fv/Fme3
Direction
decreasee2
Comparator
control plantse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chilled maize plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–72 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared to control plants grown throughout at 25”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 235–284 · show in text ↑
e2

“there was a decrease in this parameter if the plants were shifted to the light after the cold treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 407–510 · show in text ↑
e3

“the Fv/Fm hardly changed during chilling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 302–342 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Anthocyanin level in maize suddenly increased after plants were returned from dark cold conditions to a non-chilling temperature in the light.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
returning the plants from dark cold conditions to a non-chilling temperature in the lighte1
Outcome
anthocyanin levele1
Direction
increasee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chilled maize plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–72 · show in text ↑
e1

“there was a sudden increase in the anthocyanin level after returning the plants from dark cold conditions to a non-chilling temperature in the light”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–824 · show in text ↑

cold · physiology: photosynthesis · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

36 papers: 5 positive, 31 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

light · physiology: photosynthesis · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 13 positive, 15 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.