Paper · 1982 · Agronomy Journal

Insect Control on Seedling Alfalfa by Cultivars and Soil and Foliar Insecticides1

W. R. Kehr; G. R. Manglitz; R. L. Ogden

10
claims
19
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Control of insects on seedling alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.) is often desirable for stand establishment and forage production. The objective of these studies was to determine the use of cultivars and soil and foliar insecticides in controlling insects on seedling alfalfa. Three field studies were conducted on the use of preplant soil application of carbofuran (2,3‐dihydro‐2,2‐dimethyl‐7‐benzofuranyl methylcarbamate) in spring seedings on a Typic Arguidoll soil. The studies also included foliar application of carbofuran alone and in combination with soil application, and cultivars that varied, in resistance to insect species. Insecticide was applied at 1.1 kg a.i./ha. Neither soil nor foliar insecticide application increased forage yield, protein and carotene concentration of seedling alfalfa. Potato leafhopper [ Empoasca fabae (Harris)], pea aphid [ Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris)], spotted alfalfa aphid [ Therioaphis maculata (Buckton)], and plant bugs [ Lygus lineolaris (Beauv.)] and [ Adelphocoris lineolatus (Goeze)] were controlled by carbofuran. The pea aphid resistance of ‘Arc,’ ‘Baker,’ and ‘Perry’ and spotted alfalfa aphid resistance of Baker were effective in controlling aphid populations. ‘Buffalo,’ susceptible to potato leafhopper, pea aphid, and spotted alfalfa aphid, was lower than Arc, Baker, and Perry in forage yield, protein and carotene concentrations. No residual effects of soil insecticide application prior to seeding were apparent on insect numbers in the second and third cuttings.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil and foliar insecticide did not increase alfalfa forage yield, protein or carotene concentration.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Organ / stage
seedlinge0
Treatment
soil nor foliar insecticide applicatione0
Outcome
forage yield, protein and carotene concentratione0
Direction
Neithere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Neither soil nor foliar insecticide application increased forage yield, protein and carotene concentration of seedling alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 685–811 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbofuran controlled potato leafhopper.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
carbofurane0
Interactor
Empoasca fabaeEmpoasca fabaee0pest
Outcome
Potato leafhoppere0
Direction
controllede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Empoasca fabae
Empoasca fabae · Interactorxpda · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–34 · show in text ↑
e0

“Potato leafhopper [ Empoasca fabae (Harris)], pea aphid [ Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris)], spotted alfalfa aphid [ Therioaphis maculata (Buckton)], and plant bugs [ Lygus lineolaris (Beauv.)] and [ Adelphocoris lineolatus (Goeze)] were controlled by carbofuran”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 813–1071 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbofuran controlled pea aphid.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
carbofurane0
Interactor
Acyrthosiphon pisumAcyrthosiphon pisume0pest
Outcome
pea aphide0
Direction
controllede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Acyrthosiphon pisum
Acyrthosiphon pisum · InteractorShipher Wu (photograph) and Gee-way Lin (aphid provision), National Taiwan University · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–34 · show in text ↑
e0

“pea aphid [ Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris)], spotted alfalfa aphid [ Therioaphis maculata (Buckton)], and plant bugs [ Lygus lineolaris (Beauv.)] and [ Adelphocoris lineolatus (Goeze)] were controlled by carbofuran”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 859–1071 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbofuran controlled spotted alfalfa aphid.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
carbofurane0
Interactor
Therioaphis maculataTherioaphis trifoliie0pest
Outcome
spotted alfalfa aphide0
Direction
controllede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Therioaphis trifolii
Therioaphis trifolii · InteractorJesse Rorabaugh · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–34 · show in text ↑
e0

“spotted alfalfa aphid [ Therioaphis maculata (Buckton)], and plant bugs [ Lygus lineolaris (Beauv.)] and [ Adelphocoris lineolatus (Goeze)] were controlled by carbofuran”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 902–1071 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbofuran controlled Lygus lineolaris plant bugs.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
carbofurane0
Interactor
Lygus lineolarisLygus lineolarise0pest
Outcome
plant bugse0
Direction
controllede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Lygus lineolaris
Lygus lineolaris · InteractorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–34 · show in text ↑
e0

“plant bugs [ Lygus lineolaris (Beauv.)] and [ Adelphocoris lineolatus (Goeze)] were controlled by carbofuran”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 963–1071 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbofuran controlled Adelphocoris lineolatus plant bugs.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
carbofurane0
Interactor
Adelphocoris lineolatusAdelphocoris lineolatuse0pest
Outcome
plant bugse0
Direction
controllede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Adelphocoris lineolatus
Adelphocoris lineolatus · InteractorDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–34 · show in text ↑
e0

“plant bugs [ Lygus lineolaris (Beauv.)] and [ Adelphocoris lineolatus (Goeze)] were controlled by carbofuran”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 963–1071 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Arc, Baker and Perry resistance controlled pea aphid populations.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativat0
Material
‘Arc,’ ‘Baker,’ and ‘Perry’e0
Interactor
pea aphidAcyrthosiphon pisume0pest
Outcome
pea aphide0
Direction
controllinge0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Acyrthosiphon pisum
Acyrthosiphon pisum · InteractorShipher Wu (photograph) and Gee-way Lin (aphid provision), National Taiwan University · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–34 · show in text ↑
e0

“The pea aphid resistance of ‘Arc,’ ‘Baker,’ and ‘Perry’ and spotted alfalfa aphid resistance of Baker were effective in controlling aphid populations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1073–1222 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Baker resistance controlled spotted alfalfa aphid populations.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativat0
Material
Bakere0
Interactor
spotted alfalfa aphide0pest
Outcome
aphid populationse0
Direction
controllinge0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–34 · show in text ↑
e0

“spotted alfalfa aphid resistance of Baker were effective in controlling aphid populations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1133–1222 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Buffalo had lower forage yield, protein and carotene than Arc, Baker and Perry.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativat0
Material
‘Buffalo,’e0
Outcome
forage yield, protein and carotene concentrationse0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
Arc, Baker, and Perrye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–34 · show in text ↑
e0

“‘Buffalo,’ susceptible to potato leafhopper, pea aphid, and spotted alfalfa aphid, was lower than Arc, Baker, and Perry in forage yield, protein and carotene concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1224–1396 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preseeding soil insecticide had no apparent residual effect on insect numbers in later cuttings.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
soil insecticide application prior to seedinge0
Outcome
insect numberse0
Direction
No residual effectse0
Qualifier
second and third cuttingse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–34 · show in text ↑
e0

“No residual effects of soil insecticide application prior to seeding were apparent on insect numbers in the second and third cuttings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1398–1531 · show in text ↑

carbofuran · Empoasca fabae · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

carbofuran · Acyrthosiphon pisum · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

insecticide · quality: protein · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Results differ

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

application · quality: protein · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 4 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

insecticide · pest · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 11 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.