Paper · 1991 · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY

Root Restriction as a Factor in Photosynthetic Acclimation of Cotton Seedlings Grown in Elevated Carbon Dioxide

Richard B. Thomas; Boyd R. Strain

13
claims
26
verbatim quotes
447
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Interactive effects of root restriction and atmospheric CO(2) enrichment on plant growth, photosynthetic capacity, and carbohydrate partitioning were studied in cotton seedlings (Gossypium hirsutum L.) grown for 28 days in three atmospheric CO(2) partial pressures (270, 350, and 650 microbars) and two pot sizes (0.38 and 1.75 liters). Some plants were transplanted from small pots into large pots after 20 days. Reduction of root biomass resulting from growth in small pots was accompanied by decreased shoot biomass and leaf area. When root growth was less restricted, plants exposed to higher CO(2) partial pressures produced more shoot and root biomass than plants exposed to lower levels of CO(2). In small pots, whole plant biomass and leaf area of plants grown in 270 and 350 microbars of CO(2) were not significantly different. Plants grown in small pots in 650 microbars of CO(2) produced greater total biomass than plants grown in 350 microbars, but the dry weight gain was found to be primarily an accumulation of leaf starch. Reduced photosynthetic capacity of plants grown at elevated levels of CO(2) was clearly associated with inadequate rooting volume. Reductions in net photosynthesis were not associated with decreased stomatal conductance. Reduced carboxylation efficiency in response to CO(2) enrichment occurred only when root growth was restricted suggesting that ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase activity may be responsive to plant source-sink balance rather than to CO(2) concentration as a single factor. When root-restricted plants were transplanted into large pots, carboxylation efficiency and ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate regeneration capacity increased indicating that acclimation of photosynthesis was reversible. Reductions in photosynthetic capacity as root growth was progressively restricted suggest sink-limited feedback inhibition as a possible mechanism for regulating net photosynthesis of plants grown in elevated CO(2).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth in small pots reduced root biomass of cotton seedlings.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutum L.Gossypium hirsutume0
Treatment
growth in small potse1
Outcome
root biomasse1
Direction
Reductione1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Gossypium hirsutum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 179–200 · show in text ↑
e1

“Reduction of root biomass resulting from growth in small pots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–475 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth in small pots, with its reduced root biomass, was accompanied by decreased shoot biomass and leaf area.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutum L.Gossypium hirsutume0
Treatment
growth in small potse1
Outcome
shoot biomass and leaf areae1
Direction
decreasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Gossypium hirsutum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 179–200 · show in text ↑
e1

“Reduction of root biomass resulting from growth in small pots was accompanied by decreased shoot biomass and leaf area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–532 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

When root growth was less restricted, plants at higher CO2 partial pressures produced more shoot and root biomass than plants at lower CO2.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutum L.Gossypium hirsutume0
Treatment
higher CO(2) partial pressurese1
Outcome
shoot and root biomasse1
Direction
moree1
Qualifier
When root growth was less restrictede1
Comparator
lower levels of CO(2)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Gossypium hirsutum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 179–200 · show in text ↑
e1

“When root growth was less restricted, plants exposed to higher CO(2) partial pressures produced more shoot and root biomass than plants exposed to lower levels of CO(2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 534–702 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In small pots, whole plant biomass and leaf area did not differ significantly between plants grown at 270 and 350 microbars of CO2.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutum L.Gossypium hirsutume0
Treatment
270 and 350 microbars of CO(2)e1
Outcome
whole plant biomass and leaf areae1
Direction
not significantly differente1
Setting
In small potse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Gossypium hirsutum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 179–200 · show in text ↑
e1

“In small pots, whole plant biomass and leaf area of plants grown in 270 and 350 microbars of CO(2) were not significantly different”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 704–835 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In small pots, plants grown at 650 microbars of CO2 produced greater total biomass than plants grown at 350 microbars.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutum L.Gossypium hirsutume0
Treatment
650 microbars of CO(2)e1
Outcome
total biomasse1
Direction
greatere1
Comparator
350 microbarse1
Setting
in small potse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Gossypium hirsutum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 179–200 · show in text ↑
e1

“Plants grown in small pots in 650 microbars of CO(2) produced greater total biomass than plants grown in 350 microbars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 837–955 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The extra dry weight gained at 650 microbars CO2 in small pots was primarily an accumulation of leaf starch.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutum L.Gossypium hirsutume0
Organ / stage
leafe1
Outcome
primarily an accumulation of leaf starche1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Gossypium hirsutum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 179–200 · show in text ↑
e1

“the dry weight gain was found to be primarily an accumulation of leaf starch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–1037 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced photosynthetic capacity of plants grown at elevated CO2 was clearly associated with inadequate rooting volume.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutum L.Gossypium hirsutume0
Treatment
elevated levels of CO(2)e1
Outcome
photosynthetic capacitye1
Direction
Reducede1
Qualifier
inadequate rooting volumee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Gossypium hirsutum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 179–200 · show in text ↑
e1

“Reduced photosynthetic capacity of plants grown at elevated levels of CO(2) was clearly associated with inadequate rooting volume”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1039–1168 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reductions in net photosynthesis were not associated with decreased stomatal conductance.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutum L.Gossypium hirsutume0
Outcome
net photosynthesise1
Direction
Reductionse1
Comparator
stomatal conductancee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Gossypium hirsutum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 179–200 · show in text ↑
e1

“Reductions in net photosynthesis were not associated with decreased stomatal conductance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1170–1258 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced carboxylation efficiency in response to CO2 enrichment occurred only when root growth was restricted.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutum L.Gossypium hirsutume0
Treatment
CO(2) enrichmente1
Outcome
carboxylation efficiencye1
Direction
Reducede1
Qualifier
only when root growth was restrictede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Gossypium hirsutum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 179–200 · show in text ↑
e1

“Reduced carboxylation efficiency in response to CO(2) enrichment occurred only when root growth was restricted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1260–1370 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest that ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase activity may respond to plant source-sink balance rather than to CO2 concentration as a single factor.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutum L.Gossypium hirsutume0
Gene
ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenasee1
Outcome
ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase activitye1
Qualifier
plant source-sink balancee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Gossypium hirsutum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 179–200 · show in text ↑
e1

“ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase activity may be responsive to plant source-sink balance rather than to CO(2) concentration as a single factor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1387–1544 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transplanting root-restricted plants into large pots increased carboxylation efficiency and ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate regeneration capacity.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutum L.Gossypium hirsutume0
Treatment
transplanted into large potse1
Outcome
carboxylation efficiency and ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate regeneration capacitye1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Gossypium hirsutum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 179–200 · show in text ↑
e1

“When root-restricted plants were transplanted into large pots, carboxylation efficiency and ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate regeneration capacity increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1546–1695 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acclimation of photosynthesis to elevated CO2 was reversible.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutum L.Gossypium hirsutume0
Outcome
acclimation of photosynthesis was reversiblee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Gossypium hirsutum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 179–200 · show in text ↑
e1

“indicating that acclimation of photosynthesis was reversible”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1696–1756 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reductions in photosynthetic capacity as root growth was progressively restricted suggest sink-limited feedback inhibition as a possible mechanism regulating net photosynthesis in elevated CO2.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutum L.Gossypium hirsutume0
Outcome
net photosynthesise1
Qualifier
sink-limited feedback inhibitione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Gossypium hirsutum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 179–200 · show in text ↑
e1

“Reductions in photosynthetic capacity as root growth was progressively restricted suggest sink-limited feedback inhibition as a possible mechanism for regulating net photosynthesis of plants grown in elevated CO(2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1758–1972 · show in text ↑

co2 · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

23 papers: 18 positive, 5 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

transplanting · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.