Paper · 2014 · Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca

Sensory Quality of ‘Cherry’ Tomatoes in Relation to 1-MCP Treatment and Storage Duration

Marek GAJEWSKI; Katarzyna MAZUR; Jadwiga RADZANOWSKA; et al.

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

1-MCP (1-methylcyclopropene), the ethylene receptors blocker, is used in horticultural practice for prolonging shelf-life of several species of fruits and vegetables. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of 1-MCP treatment on sensory characteristics of cherry type tomatoes (Solanum lycopersicum L. var. cerasiforme) after 4-week storage. In the experiment the fruits were harvested at pink and light-red fruit stages (3rd and 5th stage, according to USDA classification), and stored for 3 and 4 weeks at 12 oC, then moved to 20 sup>oC for 2 days to obtain marketable maturity. 1-MCP was applied after harvest in concentration of 1 ppm, for 12 hours at 18 oC. The plants belonging to the Dasher F1 cultivar were grown in a greenhouse in rockwool slabs and fruits were harvested in June. Sensory analysis was performed in expert panel with Quantitative Descriptive Analysis (QDA), using 12 sensory descriptors concerning smell, taste, flavour and texture of the fruits. Also semi-consumer test of liking was carried out. As the control freshly harvested red fruits at optimal consumer's maturity were used. The 1-MCP treated fruits harvested in the light-red stage were of better sensory quality than the untreated ones, similar to freshly harvested, but in the case of the pink fruits, the quality was rated lower. It can be concluded that 1-MCP treatment was effective in delaying ripening of the fruits by better keeping their firmness and colour, however in the case of fruits harvested in earlier stage, overall sensory quality and consumer acceptance was scored lower than for the freshly harvested ones, mainly due to more intensive sour taste and lower sweetness.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At light-red harvest, treated tomatoes had better sensory quality than untreated fruit, similar to fresh fruit.

Organ / stage
light-red stagee0
Treatment
1-MCPe0
Outcome
sensory qualitye0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
untreated onese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 1-MCP treated fruits harvested in the light-red stage were of better sensory quality than the untreated ones, similar to freshly harvested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1125–1267 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At pink harvest, treated fruit quality was rated lower.

Organ / stage
pink fruitse0
Treatment
1-MCP Treatmentt0
Outcome
qualitye0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but in the case of the pink fruits, the quality was rated lower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1269–1332 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomatoes in Relation to 1-MCP Treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1-MCP delayed fruit ripening by better preserving firmness and colour.

Treatment
1-MCP treatmente0
Outcome
ripening of the fruitse0
Direction
delayinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“1-MCP treatment was effective in delaying ripening of the fruits by better keeping their firmness and colour”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1359–1467 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

For earlier-harvested fruit, overall sensory quality and consumer acceptance were lower than for freshly harvested fruit.

Organ / stage
earlier stagee0
Treatment
1-MCP Treatmentt0
Outcome
overall sensory quality and consumer acceptancee0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
freshly harvested onese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruits harvested in earlier stage, overall sensory quality and consumer acceptance was scored lower than for the freshly harvested ones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1492–1627 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomatoes in Relation to 1-MCP Treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–67 · show in text ↑

1-methylcyclopropene · quality: general · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

1-methylcyclopropene · quality: postharvest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

53 papers: 53 positive, 0 negative or no effect

52 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.