Paper · 1990 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Response of greenhouse cucumber to mineral fertilizers on a high phosphorus and potassium soil

Ibrahim G. Rubeiz

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
6
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The response of greenhouse cucumber (Cucumis sativus L. cv. Lolita) to nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) fertilizers on a soil high in available P and K was studied during 1986. The greenhouses were located in the Beqa Valley, central Lebanon, and their soil chemical properties before planting were: NO3‐N = 52 ppm, P(NaHCO3 ext.) = 100 ppm, K (ammonium acetate ext.) = 650 ppm, ECe = 1.6 dS/m, pH = 7.5. Nitrogen at 200 kg/ha, P at 85 kg/ha and K at 150 kg/ha were applied in the following combinations: N, N+K, N+P+K and an unfertilized control. The rates were split into four equal weekly applications starting on the fourth week after transplanting the seedlings to the greenhouse. The treatments were applied through the drip irrigation system of the greenhouses. Fruit yield over the two months of harvest was highest in plants receiving N alone, which yielded 57 ton/ha. Yields of the plots receiving N+K, N+P+K and the control were 55.0, 54.0 and 39.5 ton/ha, respectively. Yield during the first month of harvest was comparable in all fertilized treatments and was substantially higher than the control.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N alone produced the highest fruit yield, 57 ton/ha.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
N alonee0
Outcome
Fruit yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
57 ton/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruit yield over the two months of harvest was highest in plants receiving N alone, which yielded 57 ton/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–899 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–31 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N+K yielded 55.0 ton/ha.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
N+Ke0
Outcome
Yieldse0
Value
55.0e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yields of the plots receiving N+K, N+P+K and the control were 55.0, 54.0 and 39.5 ton/ha, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–1003 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–31 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N+P+K yielded 54.0 ton/ha.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
N+P+Ke0
Outcome
Yieldse0
Value
54.0e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yields of the plots receiving N+K, N+P+K and the control were 55.0, 54.0 and 39.5 ton/ha, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–1003 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–31 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The unfertilized control yielded 39.5 ton/ha.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
the controle0
Outcome
Yieldse0
Value
39.5 ton/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yields of the plots receiving N+K, N+P+K and the control were 55.0, 54.0 and 39.5 ton/ha, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–1003 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–31 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

First-month yield was comparable among fertilized treatments.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Outcome
Yielde0
Direction
comparablee0
Qualifier
first month of harveste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield during the first month of harvest was comparable in all fertilized treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1088 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

First-month yield in fertilized treatments was substantially higher than control.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
all fertilized treatmentse0
Outcome
Yielde0
Direction
substantially highere0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield during the first month of harvest was comparable in all fertilized treatments and was substantially higher than the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1134 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–31 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

288 papers: 263 positive, 25 negative or no effect

262 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

284 papers more in this group

See all 288 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.