Paper · 2005 · Photosynthetica

Photosynthetic responses of radish (Raphanus sativus var. longipinnatus) plants to infection by turnip mosaic virus

Y. P. Guo; D. P. Guo; Y. Peng; et al.

15
claims
15
verbatim quotes
17
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Plant growth, chlorophyll (Chl) content, photosynthetic gas exchange, ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase (RuBPCO) enzyme activity, and Chl fluorescence in radish (Raphanus sativus var. longipinnatus) plants were examined after turnip mosaic virus (TuMV) infection. Plant fresh mass, dry mass, Chl content, net photosynthetic rate (PN), transpiration rate (E), stomatal conductance (gs), and RuBPCO activity were significantly lower in infected plants after 5 weeks of virus infection as compared to healthy plants. The 5-week virus infection did not induce significant differences in intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci, photochemical efficiency of photosystem 2, PS2 (Fv/Fm), excitation capture efficiency of open PS2 reaction centres (Fv'/Fm'), effective quantum efficiency of photosystem 2 (ΔF/Fm'), and photochemical quenching (qP), but non-photochemical quenching (qN) and alternative electron sink (AES) were significantly enhanced. Thus the decreased plant biomass of TuMV-infected plants might be associated with the decreased photosynthetic activity mainly due to reduced RuBPCO activity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant fresh mass was significantly lower in virus-infected radish after five weeks.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee0
Treatment
virus infectione0
Interactor
viruse0pathogen
Outcome
Plant fresh masse0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
healthy plantse0

Verbatim

e0

“Plant fresh mass, dry mass, Chl content, net photosynthetic rate (PN), transpiration rate (E), stomatal conductance (gs), and RuBPCO activity were significantly lower in infected plants after 5 weeks of virus infection as compared to healthy plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 268–516 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

dry mass was significantly lower in virus-infected radish after five weeks.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee0
Treatment
virus infectione0
Interactor
viruse0pathogen
Outcome
dry masse0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
healthy plantse0

Verbatim

e0

“Plant fresh mass, dry mass, Chl content, net photosynthetic rate (PN), transpiration rate (E), stomatal conductance (gs), and RuBPCO activity were significantly lower in infected plants after 5 weeks of virus infection as compared to healthy plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 268–516 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chl content was significantly lower in virus-infected radish after five weeks.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee0
Treatment
virus infectione0
Interactor
viruse0pathogen
Outcome
Chl contente0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
healthy plantse0

Verbatim

e0

“Plant fresh mass, dry mass, Chl content, net photosynthetic rate (PN), transpiration rate (E), stomatal conductance (gs), and RuBPCO activity were significantly lower in infected plants after 5 weeks of virus infection as compared to healthy plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 268–516 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

net photosynthetic rate (PN) was significantly lower in virus-infected radish after five weeks.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee0
Treatment
virus infectione0
Interactor
viruse0pathogen
Outcome
net photosynthetic rate (PN)e0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
healthy plantse0

Verbatim

e0

“Plant fresh mass, dry mass, Chl content, net photosynthetic rate (PN), transpiration rate (E), stomatal conductance (gs), and RuBPCO activity were significantly lower in infected plants after 5 weeks of virus infection as compared to healthy plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 268–516 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

transpiration rate (E) was significantly lower in virus-infected radish after five weeks.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee0
Treatment
virus infectione0
Interactor
viruse0pathogen
Outcome
transpiration rate (E)e0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
healthy plantse0

Verbatim

e0

“Plant fresh mass, dry mass, Chl content, net photosynthetic rate (PN), transpiration rate (E), stomatal conductance (gs), and RuBPCO activity were significantly lower in infected plants after 5 weeks of virus infection as compared to healthy plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 268–516 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

stomatal conductance (gs) was significantly lower in virus-infected radish after five weeks.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee0
Treatment
virus infectione0
Interactor
viruse0pathogen
Outcome
stomatal conductance (gs)e0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
healthy plantse0

Verbatim

e0

“Plant fresh mass, dry mass, Chl content, net photosynthetic rate (PN), transpiration rate (E), stomatal conductance (gs), and RuBPCO activity were significantly lower in infected plants after 5 weeks of virus infection as compared to healthy plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 268–516 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

RuBPCO activity was significantly lower in virus-infected radish after five weeks.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee0
Treatment
virus infectione0
Interactor
viruse0pathogen
Outcome
RuBPCO activitye0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
healthy plantse0

Verbatim

e0

“Plant fresh mass, dry mass, Chl content, net photosynthetic rate (PN), transpiration rate (E), stomatal conductance (gs), and RuBPCO activity were significantly lower in infected plants after 5 weeks of virus infection as compared to healthy plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 268–516 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci did not differ significantly after five weeks of virus infection.

Treatment
virus infectione0
Interactor
viruse0pathogen
Outcome
intercellular CO2 concentration (Cie0
Direction
did not induce significant differencese0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The 5-week virus infection did not induce significant differences in intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci, photochemical efficiency of photosystem 2, PS2 (Fv/Fm), excitation capture efficiency of open PS2 reaction centres (Fv'/Fm'), effective quantum efficiency of photosystem 2 (ΔF/Fm'), and photochemical quenching (qP)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 518–838 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

photochemical efficiency of photosystem 2 did not differ significantly after five weeks of virus infection.

Treatment
virus infectione0
Interactor
viruse0pathogen
Outcome
photochemical efficiency of photosystem 2e0
Direction
did not induce significant differencese0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The 5-week virus infection did not induce significant differences in intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci, photochemical efficiency of photosystem 2, PS2 (Fv/Fm), excitation capture efficiency of open PS2 reaction centres (Fv'/Fm'), effective quantum efficiency of photosystem 2 (ΔF/Fm'), and photochemical quenching (qP)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 518–838 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

excitation capture efficiency of open PS2 reaction centres did not differ significantly after five weeks of virus infection.

Treatment
virus infectione0
Interactor
viruse0pathogen
Outcome
excitation capture efficiency of open PS2 reaction centrese0
Direction
did not induce significant differencese0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The 5-week virus infection did not induce significant differences in intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci, photochemical efficiency of photosystem 2, PS2 (Fv/Fm), excitation capture efficiency of open PS2 reaction centres (Fv'/Fm'), effective quantum efficiency of photosystem 2 (ΔF/Fm'), and photochemical quenching (qP)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 518–838 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

effective quantum efficiency of photosystem 2 did not differ significantly after five weeks of virus infection.

Treatment
virus infectione0
Interactor
viruse0pathogen
Outcome
effective quantum efficiency of photosystem 2e0
Direction
did not induce significant differencese0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The 5-week virus infection did not induce significant differences in intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci, photochemical efficiency of photosystem 2, PS2 (Fv/Fm), excitation capture efficiency of open PS2 reaction centres (Fv'/Fm'), effective quantum efficiency of photosystem 2 (ΔF/Fm'), and photochemical quenching (qP)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 518–838 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

photochemical quenching (qP) did not differ significantly after five weeks of virus infection.

Treatment
virus infectione0
Interactor
viruse0pathogen
Outcome
photochemical quenching (qP)e0
Direction
did not induce significant differencese0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The 5-week virus infection did not induce significant differences in intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci, photochemical efficiency of photosystem 2, PS2 (Fv/Fm), excitation capture efficiency of open PS2 reaction centres (Fv'/Fm'), effective quantum efficiency of photosystem 2 (ΔF/Fm'), and photochemical quenching (qP)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 518–838 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

non-photochemical quenching (qN) was significantly enhanced by virus infection.

Outcome
non-photochemical quenching (qN)e0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“non-photochemical quenching (qN) and alternative electron sink (AES) were significantly enhanced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 844–940 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

alternative electron sink (AES) was significantly enhanced by virus infection.

Outcome
alternative electron sink (AES)e0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“non-photochemical quenching (qN) and alternative electron sink (AES) were significantly enhanced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 844–940 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced RuBPCO activity may explain decreased photosynthetic activity and biomass in TuMV-infected plants.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee0
Interactor
TuMVTurnip mosaic viruse0pathogen
Gene
RuBPCOe0
Outcome
decreased plant biomasse0
Qualifier
decreased photosynthetic activitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Turnip mosaic virus
Turnip mosaic virus · InteractorDavid B. Langston, University of Georgia, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the decreased plant biomass of TuMV-infected plants might be associated with the decreased photosynthetic activity mainly due to reduced RuBPCO activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 947–1099 · show in text ↑

infection · molecular: metabolites · Viridiplantae (plants)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

infection · growth · Viridiplantae (plants)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

infection · physiology: photosynthesis · Viridiplantae (plants)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.