Paper · 1970 · Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Research

Quality of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) as influenced by boron and zinc under different levels of NPK fertilizers

MA Salam; MA Siddique; MA Rahim; et al.

9
claims
27
verbatim quotes
24
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The study was conducted at the vegetable research farm of the Horticulture Research Centre, Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute, Joydebpur, Gazipur during the period 2006-2007 to investigate the effects of boron and zinc in presence of different levels of NPK fertilizers on quality of tomato. There were twelve treatment combinations which comprised four levels of boron and zinc viz., i) B0Zn0= 0 kg B + 0 kg Zn/ha, ii) B1.5Zn2.0= 1.5 kg B + 2.0 kg Zn/ha, iii) B2.0Zn4.0 = 2.0 kg B + 4.0 kg Zn/ha, iv) B2.5Zn6.0, 2.5 kg B + 6.0 kg Zn/ha and three levels of NPK fertilizers viz., i) 50% less than the recommended NPK fertilizer dose (50% <RD), ii) Recommended NPK fertilizer dose (RD), iii) 50% more than the recommended NPK fertilizer dose (50% >RD). The highest pulp weight (88.14%), dry matter content (5.34%), TSS (4.50%), acidity (0.47%), ascorbic acid (10.95 mg/100g), lycopene content (112.00 μg/100g), chlorophyll-a (41.00μg/100g), chlorophyll-b (56.00 μg/100g), marketable fruits at 30 days after storage (67.48%) and shelf life (16 days) were recorded with the combination of 2.5 kg B+ 6 kg Zn/ha and recommended dose of NPK fertilizers (N= 253, P= 90, and K= 125 kg/ha). Keywords: Quality of tomato; boron and zinc; NPK fertilizer. DOI: 10.3329/bjar.v35i3.6454Bangladesh J. Agril. Res. 35(3) : 475-488

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pulp weight of tomato fruit was highest (88.14%) with 2.5 kg B + 6 kg Zn/ha and the recommended NPK dose.

Treatment
combination of 2.5 kg B+ 6 kg Zn/ha and recommended dose of NPK fertilizerse2
Outcome
pulp weighte1
Direction
higheste1
Value
88.14%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The highest pulp weight (88.14%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–792 · show in text ↑
e2

“combination of 2.5 kg B+ 6 kg Zn/ha and recommended dose of NPK fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1154 · show in text ↑
e3

“on quality of tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 279–299 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry matter content of tomato fruit was highest (5.34%) with 2.5 kg B + 6 kg Zn/ha and the recommended NPK dose.

Treatment
combination of 2.5 kg B+ 6 kg Zn/ha and recommended dose of NPK fertilizerse2
Outcome
dry matter contente1
Direction
higheste1
Value
5.34%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The highest pulp weight (88.14%), dry matter content (5.34%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–820 · show in text ↑
e2

“combination of 2.5 kg B+ 6 kg Zn/ha and recommended dose of NPK fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1154 · show in text ↑
e3

“on quality of tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 279–299 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total soluble solids (TSS) of tomato fruit was highest (4.50%) with 2.5 kg B + 6 kg Zn/ha and the recommended NPK dose.

Treatment
combination of 2.5 kg B+ 6 kg Zn/ha and recommended dose of NPK fertilizerse2
Outcome
TSSe1
Direction
higheste1
Value
4.50%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The highest pulp weight (88.14%), dry matter content (5.34%), TSS (4.50%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–833 · show in text ↑
e2

“combination of 2.5 kg B+ 6 kg Zn/ha and recommended dose of NPK fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1154 · show in text ↑
e3

“on quality of tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 279–299 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acidity of tomato fruit was highest (0.47%) with 2.5 kg B + 6 kg Zn/ha and the recommended NPK dose.

Treatment
combination of 2.5 kg B+ 6 kg Zn/ha and recommended dose of NPK fertilizerse2
Outcome
aciditye1
Direction
higheste1
Value
0.47%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The highest pulp weight (88.14%), dry matter content (5.34%), TSS (4.50%), acidity (0.47%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–850 · show in text ↑
e2

“combination of 2.5 kg B+ 6 kg Zn/ha and recommended dose of NPK fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1154 · show in text ↑
e3

“on quality of tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 279–299 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ascorbic acid of tomato fruit was highest (10.95 mg/100g) with 2.5 kg B + 6 kg Zn/ha and the recommended NPK dose.

Treatment
combination of 2.5 kg B+ 6 kg Zn/ha and recommended dose of NPK fertilizerse2
Outcome
ascorbic acide1
Direction
higheste1
Value
10.95 mg/100ge1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The highest pulp weight (88.14%), dry matter content (5.34%), TSS (4.50%), acidity (0.47%), ascorbic acid (10.95 mg/100g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–881 · show in text ↑
e2

“combination of 2.5 kg B+ 6 kg Zn/ha and recommended dose of NPK fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1154 · show in text ↑
e3

“on quality of tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 279–299 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lycopene content of tomato fruit was highest (112.00 μg/100g) with 2.5 kg B + 6 kg Zn/ha and the recommended NPK dose.

Treatment
combination of 2.5 kg B+ 6 kg Zn/ha and recommended dose of NPK fertilizerse2
Outcome
lycopene contente1
Direction
higheste1
Value
112.00 μg/100ge1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The highest pulp weight (88.14%), dry matter content (5.34%), TSS (4.50%), acidity (0.47%), ascorbic acid (10.95 mg/100g), lycopene content (112.00 μg/100g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–916 · show in text ↑
e2

“combination of 2.5 kg B+ 6 kg Zn/ha and recommended dose of NPK fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1154 · show in text ↑
e3

“on quality of tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 279–299 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll-a of tomato fruit was highest (41.00μg/100g) with 2.5 kg B + 6 kg Zn/ha and the recommended NPK dose.

Treatment
combination of 2.5 kg B+ 6 kg Zn/ha and recommended dose of NPK fertilizerse2
Outcome
chlorophyll-ae1
Direction
higheste1
Value
41.00μg/100ge1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The highest pulp weight (88.14%), dry matter content (5.34%), TSS (4.50%), acidity (0.47%), ascorbic acid (10.95 mg/100g), lycopene content (112.00 μg/100g), chlorophyll-a (41.00μg/100g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–946 · show in text ↑
e2

“combination of 2.5 kg B+ 6 kg Zn/ha and recommended dose of NPK fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1154 · show in text ↑
e3

“on quality of tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 279–299 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll-b of tomato fruit was highest (56.00 μg/100g) with 2.5 kg B + 6 kg Zn/ha and the recommended NPK dose.

Treatment
combination of 2.5 kg B+ 6 kg Zn/ha and recommended dose of NPK fertilizerse2
Outcome
chlorophyll-be1
Direction
higheste1
Value
56.00 μg/100ge1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The highest pulp weight (88.14%), dry matter content (5.34%), TSS (4.50%), acidity (0.47%), ascorbic acid (10.95 mg/100g), lycopene content (112.00 μg/100g), chlorophyll-a (41.00μg/100g), chlorophyll-b (56.00 μg/100g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–977 · show in text ↑
e2

“combination of 2.5 kg B+ 6 kg Zn/ha and recommended dose of NPK fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1154 · show in text ↑
e3

“on quality of tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 279–299 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Marketable fruits at 30 days after storage were highest (67.48%) with 2.5 kg B + 6 kg Zn/ha and the recommended NPK dose.

Treatment
combination of 2.5 kg B+ 6 kg Zn/ha and recommended dose of NPK fertilizerse2
Outcome
marketable fruits at 30 days after storagee1
Direction
higheste1
Value
67.48%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The highest pulp weight (88.14%), dry matter content (5.34%), TSS (4.50%), acidity (0.47%), ascorbic acid (10.95 mg/100g), lycopene content (112.00 μg/100g), chlorophyll-a (41.00μg/100g), chlorophyll-b (56.00 μg/100g), marketable fruits at 30 days after storage (67.48%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–1030 · show in text ↑
e2

“combination of 2.5 kg B+ 6 kg Zn/ha and recommended dose of NPK fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1154 · show in text ↑
e3

“on quality of tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 279–299 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · quality: grain · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

zinc atom · quality: postharvest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

zinc atom · quality: sugar starch · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

zinc atom · quality: phytochemicals · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 16 positive, 2 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

zinc atom · physiology: pigments · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 6 positive, 12 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

fertilization · quality: grain · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

53 papers: 40 positive, 13 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

fertilization · physiology: pigments · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

105 papers: 84 positive, 21 negative or no effect

83 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

101 papers more in this group

See all 105 papers →

fertilization · quality: postharvest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

111 papers: 90 positive, 21 negative or no effect

89 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

107 papers more in this group

See all 111 papers →

8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.