Paper · 2013 · American Journal of Plant Sciences

Glyphosate-Resistant Giant Ragweed (Ambrosia trifida L.): 2,4-D Dose Response and Control with Postemergence Herbicides in Soybean

Joanna Follings; Nader Soltani; Darren E. Robinson; et al.

5
claims
11
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Glyphosate resistant giant ragweed is an increasing problem in glyphosate resistant cropping systems in southwestern Ontario. The postemergence herbicides registered for use in soybean in Ontario do not provide consistent control of glyphosate resistant giant ragweed. There is limited research on the lowest effective rate of 2,4-D for the control of glyphosate resistant giant ragweed. Consequently, the objectives of this study were a) to determine the efficacy of herbicides applied postemergence for the control of glyphosate resistant giant ragweed in glyphosate resistant soybean, and b) to determine the lowest effective rate of 2,4-D for the control of glyphosate-resistant giant ragweed. Ten postemergence herbicide combinations and seven rates of 2,4-D were evaluated in field studies conducted in 2011 and 2012 at six locations confirmed with glyphosate-resistant giant ragweed. The post emergence herbicides evaluated did not provide acceptable/consistent control. Of the herbicides evaluated, glyphosate plus cloransulam-methyl provided 26% to 70% control 8 WAA of glyphosate resistant giant ragweed, which was the best of the herbicides combinations evaluated. The doses of 2,4-D required to reduce giant ragweed shoot dry weight by 50, 80 and 95% were 142, 310 and 1048 g a.e. ha-1, respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Evaluated postemergence herbicides did not provide acceptable consistent ragweed control.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Interactor
giant ragweedAmbrosia trifidae2weed
Outcome
acceptable/consistent controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ambrosia trifida
Ambrosia trifida · InteractorLe.Loup.Gris · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The post emergence herbicides evaluated did not provide acceptable/consistent control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–976 · show in text ↑
e1

“in soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–184 · show in text ↑
e2

“glyphosate resistant giant ragweed in glyphosate resistant soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 520–586 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate plus cloransulam-methyl was the best evaluated combination, providing 26% to 70% ragweed control at 8 WAA.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Treatment
glyphosate plus cloransulam-methyle0
Interactor
giant ragweedAmbrosia trifidae0weed
Outcome
control 8 WAA of glyphosate resistant giant ragweede0
Direction
beste0
Value
26% to 70%e0
Comparator
herbicides combinations evaluatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ambrosia trifida
Ambrosia trifida · InteractorLe.Loup.Gris · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“glyphosate plus cloransulam-methyl provided 26% to 70% control 8 WAA of glyphosate resistant giant ragweed, which was the best of the herbicides combinations evaluated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1174 · show in text ↑
e1

“in soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–184 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 2,4-D dose of 142 g a.e. ha-1 reduced ragweed shoot dry weight by 50%.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Treatment
2,4-De0
Interactor
giant ragweedAmbrosia trifidae0weed
Outcome
giant ragweed shoot dry weighte0
Direction
reducee0
Value
142e0
Qualifier
by 50e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ambrosia trifida
Ambrosia trifida · InteractorLe.Loup.Gris · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The doses of 2,4-D required to reduce giant ragweed shoot dry weight by 50, 80 and 95% were 142, 310 and 1048 g a.e. ha-1, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1176–1311 · show in text ↑
e1

“in soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–184 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 2,4-D dose of 310 g a.e. ha-1 reduced ragweed shoot dry weight by 80%.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Treatment
2,4-De0
Interactor
giant ragweedAmbrosia trifidae0weed
Outcome
giant ragweed shoot dry weighte0
Direction
reducee0
Value
310e0
Qualifier
80e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ambrosia trifida
Ambrosia trifida · InteractorLe.Loup.Gris · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The doses of 2,4-D required to reduce giant ragweed shoot dry weight by 50, 80 and 95% were 142, 310 and 1048 g a.e. ha-1, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1176–1311 · show in text ↑
e1

“in soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–184 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 2,4-D dose of 1048 g a.e. ha-1 reduced ragweed shoot dry weight by 95%.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Treatment
2,4-De0
Interactor
giant ragweedAmbrosia trifidae0weed
Outcome
giant ragweed shoot dry weighte0
Direction
reducee0
Value
1048 g a.e. ha-1e0
Qualifier
95%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ambrosia trifida
Ambrosia trifida · InteractorLe.Loup.Gris · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The doses of 2,4-D required to reduce giant ragweed shoot dry weight by 50, 80 and 95% were 142, 310 and 1048 g a.e. ha-1, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1176–1311 · show in text ↑
e1

“in soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–184 · show in text ↑

glyphosate · Ambrosia trifida · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

cloransulam-methyl · Ambrosia trifida · Glycine max (soybean)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

2,4-D · Ambrosia trifida · Glycine max (soybean)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.