Paper · 2009 · Journal of Agricultural Science

Utility of Dried Distillers Grain as a Fertilizer Source for Corn

Kelly A. Nelson; Peter P. Motavalli; Randall L. Smoot

6
claims
7
verbatim quotes
36
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Increased ethanol production may result in excessive dried distillers grains (DDGs) that could be utilized as a fertilizersource for corn (Zea mays L.). Research was conducted to evaluate the effects of 1) DDG rates on weed suppression,changes in soil properties, and differences in grain yield and quality and 2) DDGs, polymer-coated urea (PCU), andanhydrous ammonia (AA) fertilizer sources on grain yield and quality. DDGs had a total N-P-K composition of38.2-6.9-11.5 g kg-1, respectively. There was no corn injury, common cocklebur or jimsonweed control with DDG ratesup to 3600 kg ha-1. Corn grain yield increased 1.41 and 1.56 kg ha-1 for every kg ha-1 of DDGs applied in medium andhigh yield environments, respectively. Grain yield was ranked non-treated control < DDGs < AA = PCU whenfertilizers were applied at N equivalent rate of 140 kg ha-1 in medium and high yield environments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DDG rates up to 3600 kg ha-1 caused no corn injury.

Treatment
DDG ratesup to 3600 kg ha-1e0
Outcome
corn injurye0
Direction
noe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no corn injury, common cocklebur or jimsonweed control with DDG ratesup to 3600 kg ha-1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 493–591 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DDG rates up to 3600 kg ha-1 did not control common cocklebur.

Treatment
DDG ratesup to 3600 kg ha-1e0
Interactor
common cocklebure0weed
Outcome
common cocklebure0
Direction
noe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no corn injury, common cocklebur or jimsonweed control with DDG ratesup to 3600 kg ha-1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 493–591 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DDG rates up to 3600 kg ha-1 did not control jimsonweed.

Treatment
DDG ratesup to 3600 kg ha-1e0
Interactor
jimsonweedDatura stramoniume0weed
Outcome
jimsonweed controle0
Direction
noe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Datura stramonium
Datura stramonium · InteractorNo machine-readable author provided. Taka assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no corn injury, common cocklebur or jimsonweed control with DDG ratesup to 3600 kg ha-1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 493–591 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In medium yield environments, each DDG application unit increased corn grain yield by 1.41 kg ha-1.

Treatment
DDGs appliede0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
1.41e0
Qualifier
kg ha-1e0
Setting
mediume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Corn grain yield increased 1.41 and 1.56 kg ha-1 for every kg ha-1 of DDGs applied in medium andhigh yield environments, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 592–726 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In high yield environments, each DDG application unit increased corn grain yield by 1.56 kg ha-1.

Treatment
DDGs appliede0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
1.56 kg ha-1e0
Setting
high yield environmentse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Corn grain yield increased 1.41 and 1.56 kg ha-1 for every kg ha-1 of DDGs applied in medium andhigh yield environments, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 592–726 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At equivalent nitrogen rate, corn grain yield ranked control below DDGs below AA and PCU.

Treatment
DDGse0
Outcome
Grain yielde0
Direction
rankede0
Qualifier
N equivalent rate of 140 kg ha-1e0
Comparator
non-treated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield was ranked non-treated control < DDGs < AA = PCU whenfertilizers were applied at N equivalent rate of 140 kg ha-1 in medium and high yield environments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–891 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–65 · show in text ↑

processing · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

54 papers: 39 positive, 15 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

50 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.