Paper · 1993 · Crop Science

Intraspecific Variation in Sensitivity to UV‐B Radiation in Rice

Paul W. Barnes; Sharon Maggard; Steven R. Holman; et al.

8
claims
17
verbatim quotes
108
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Twenty‐two cultivars of rice ( Oryza sativa L.) from diverse origins were grown under greenhouse conditions and exposed to ultraviolet‐B radiation (UV‐B; 280‐320 nm) simulating a 5% reduction in stratospheric ozone in spring for the Philippines (14° N lat.) to evaluate growth and morphological responses to UV‐B. In comparison to controls that received no UV‐B, plants exposed to UV‐B exhibited significantly reduced dry matter production (total plant and shoot), shoot height, leaf blade length and total leaf area, increased number of tillers, and greater weight fractions in leaf blades and roots. For most cultivars, the relative effects of UV‐B on shoot morphology were greater than the effects on biomass production. The direction of the UV‐B effects were generally similar for all cultivars, however, there were significant differences among cultivars in the magnitude of the UV‐Binduced changes. Upland cultivars (IRAT104 and OS4) and two lowland cultivars commonly planted in the USA (Star Bonnet and Lemont) were found to be least affected by the UV‐B, whereas modern, high yielding, lowland cultivars developed in the Philippines (IR52, IR35546‐17‐33, and IR58) were found to be among the most sensitive to UV‐B. Our results indicate that in rice, as in other grasses, shoot morphology may be more responsive to solar UV‐B change than plant productivity. Intraspecific variation in morphological responses to UVB could contribute to differences among cultivars in susceptibility to UV‐B‐induced changes in competitive balance between rice and associated weeds of the rice agroecosystem.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-B reduced total plant and shoot dry matter, shoot height, and leaf blade length.

Treatment
exposed to UV‐Be0
Outcome
dry matter production (total plant and shoot), shoot height, leaf blade lengthe0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
controls that received no UV‐Be0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In comparison to controls that received no UV‐B, plants exposed to UV‐B exhibited significantly reduced dry matter production (total plant and shoot), shoot height, leaf blade length and total leaf area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 314–516 · show in text ↑
e1

“cultivars of rice ( Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 11–47 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-B reduced total leaf area.

Treatment
exposed to UV‐Be0
Outcome
total leaf areae0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
controls that received no UV‐Be0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In comparison to controls that received no UV‐B, plants exposed to UV‐B exhibited significantly reduced dry matter production (total plant and shoot), shoot height, leaf blade length and total leaf area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 314–516 · show in text ↑
e1

“cultivars of rice ( Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 11–47 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-B increased tiller number and leaf blade and root weight fractions.

Treatment
exposed to UV‐Be1
Outcome
number of tillers, and greater weight fractions in leaf blades and rootse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
controls that received no UV‐Be1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased number of tillers, and greater weight fractions in leaf blades and roots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 518–601 · show in text ↑
e1

“In comparison to controls that received no UV‐B, plants exposed to UV‐B”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 314–385 · show in text ↑
e2

“cultivars of rice ( Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 11–47 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

For most cultivars, UV-B effects on shoot morphology exceeded effects on biomass.

Treatment
UV‐Be0
Outcome
relative effects of UV‐B on shoot morphologye0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
effects on biomass productione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For most cultivars, the relative effects of UV‐B on shoot morphology were greater than the effects on biomass production.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 602–723 · show in text ↑
e1

“cultivars of rice ( Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 11–47 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivars differed significantly in the magnitude of UV-B responses.

Outcome
differences among cultivars in the magnitude of the UV‐Binduced changese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there were significant differences among cultivars in the magnitude of the UV‐Binduced changes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–904 · show in text ↑
e1

“cultivars of rice ( Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 11–47 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IRAT104 and OS4 were among the least affected cultivars.

Material
IRAT104 and OS4e0
Outcome
least affected by the UV‐Be0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Upland cultivars (IRAT104 and OS4) and two lowland cultivars commonly planted in the USA (Star Bonnet and Lemont) were found to be least affected by the UV‐B”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–1062 · show in text ↑
e1

“cultivars of rice ( Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 11–47 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Star Bonnet and Lemont were among the least affected cultivars.

Material
Star Bonnet and Lemonte0
Outcome
least affected by the UV‐Be0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Upland cultivars (IRAT104 and OS4) and two lowland cultivars commonly planted in the USA (Star Bonnet and Lemont) were found to be least affected by the UV‐B”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–1062 · show in text ↑
e1

“cultivars of rice ( Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 11–47 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IR52, IR35546‐17‐33, and IR58 were among the most UV-B sensitive cultivars.

Material
IR52, IR35546‐17‐33, and IR58e0
Outcome
most sensitive to UV‐Be0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“IR52, IR35546‐17‐33, and IR58) were found to be among the most sensitive to UV‐B.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1143–1224 · show in text ↑
e1

“cultivars of rice ( Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 11–47 · show in text ↑

uv · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

15 papers: 2 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

uv · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

27 papers: 6 positive, 21 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.