Paper · 2010 · Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis

Effects of Nitrogen and Phosphorus Application from Swine Manure on Winter Wheat Growth and Nutrient Utilization

Danielle M. Sholly; Brian T. Richert; Alan L. Sutton; et al.

7
claims
7
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Two trials were conducted to determine the effect of swine manure application on wheat growth and nutrient uptake. Manure was added to soil on a nitrogen (N) basis at 325 kg plant-available nitrogen (PAN) ha−1 (experiment 1) and on a phosphorus (P) basis at 50 kg P ha−1, while maintaining a rate of 325 kg PAN ha−1 through ammonium sulfate addition (experiment 2). Manure treatments increased overall wheat growth by 29% (P < 0.005) compared to the negative control (NC) and increased plant tissue N mass 48% (P < 0.001) and P mass 61% (P < 0.002) (experiment 1). Fertilizer control tended to increase (P < 0.10) wheat growth and increased total vegetative tissue N mass by 23% (P < 0.006) and potassium mass by 20% (P < 0.002) compared to manure treatments. Manure treatments increased wheat growth by 23% (P < 0.03) compared to the NC at the first harvest (experiment 2).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Manure treatments increased overall wheat growth by 29% compared to the negative control (experiment 1).

Treatment
Manure treatmentse1
Outcome
overall wheat growthe1
Direction
increasede1
Value
29%e1
Qualifier
experiment 1e1
Comparator
negative control (NC)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Manure treatments increased overall wheat growth by 29% (P < 0.005) compared to the negative control (NC) and increased plant tissue N mass 48% (P < 0.001) and P mass 61% (P < 0.002) (experiment 1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 366–563 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Manure treatments increased plant tissue N mass by 48% compared to the negative control (experiment 1).

Treatment
Manure treatmentse1
Outcome
plant tissue N masse1
Direction
increasede1
Value
48%e1
Qualifier
experiment 1e1
Comparator
negative control (NC)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Manure treatments increased overall wheat growth by 29% (P < 0.005) compared to the negative control (NC) and increased plant tissue N mass 48% (P < 0.001) and P mass 61% (P < 0.002) (experiment 1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 366–563 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Manure treatments increased plant tissue P mass by 61% compared to the negative control (experiment 1).

Treatment
Manure treatmentse1
Outcome
P masse1
Direction
increasede1
Value
61%e1
Qualifier
experiment 1e1
Comparator
negative control (NC)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Manure treatments increased overall wheat growth by 29% (P < 0.005) compared to the negative control (NC) and increased plant tissue N mass 48% (P < 0.001) and P mass 61% (P < 0.002) (experiment 1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 366–563 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fertilizer control tended to increase wheat growth compared to manure treatments.

Treatment
Fertilizer controle2
Outcome
wheat growthe2
Direction
increasee2
Qualifier
P < 0.10e2
Comparator
manure treatmentse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Fertilizer control tended to increase (P < 0.10) wheat growth and increased total vegetative tissue N mass by 23% (P < 0.006) and potassium mass by 20% (P < 0.002) compared to manure treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 565–758 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The fertilizer control increased total vegetative tissue N mass by 23% compared to manure treatments.

Treatment
Fertilizer controle2
Outcome
total vegetative tissue N masse2
Direction
increasede2
Value
23%e2
Comparator
manure treatmentse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Fertilizer control tended to increase (P < 0.10) wheat growth and increased total vegetative tissue N mass by 23% (P < 0.006) and potassium mass by 20% (P < 0.002) compared to manure treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 565–758 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The fertilizer control increased potassium mass by 20% compared to manure treatments.

Treatment
Fertilizer controle2
Outcome
potassium masse2
Direction
increasede2
Value
20%e2
Comparator
manure treatmentse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Fertilizer control tended to increase (P < 0.10) wheat growth and increased total vegetative tissue N mass by 23% (P < 0.006) and potassium mass by 20% (P < 0.002) compared to manure treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 565–758 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Manure treatments increased wheat growth by 23% compared to the NC at the first harvest (experiment 2).

Treatment
Manure treatmentse3
Outcome
wheat growthe3
Direction
increasede3
Value
23%e3
Qualifier
first harveste3
Comparator
NCe3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Manure treatments increased wheat growth by 23% (P < 0.03) compared to the NC at the first harvest (experiment 2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–873 · show in text ↑

fertilization · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

755 papers: 663 positive, 92 negative or no effect

662 papers in the same direction as this paper · 89 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. no effect

751 papers more in this group

See all 755 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.