Paper · 1997 · Physiologia Plantarum

Heat treatment to decrease chilling injury in tomato fruit. Effects on lipids, pericarp lesions and fungal growth

Susan Lurie; Mostafa Laamim; Zoria Lapsker; et al.

8
claims
8
verbatim quotes
51
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Tomato fruits are sensitive to low temperature and develop chilling injury, while at nonchilling temperatures they ripen rapidly. Previously, a hot‐air treatment was found to reduce the sensitivity of the fruit to low temperatures. In the present study hot air was compared to hot water and their effects on reducing chilling injury and fungal decay were investigated. Tomatoes ( Lycopersicon esculentum cv. Daniella) at the breaker stage were subjected to hot air, 48 h at 38°C, or various hot water dips, 30 min at 40°C or 2 min at 46, 48 or 50°C, before holding at 2°C. The unheated tomatoes developed chilling injury and fungal infections at 2°C, but not at 12°C. All the heat treatments reduced chilling injury and decay in tomatoes held for 3 weeks at 2°C. The outer pericarp tissue of heated tomatoes had higher phospholipid and lower sterol contents than unheated tomatoes. Heated tomatoes also had less saturated fatty acids than unheated tomatoes held at 2°C, but not at 12°C. Scanning electron micrograph observations showed that all the fruits had microcracks in their surface, but the unheated chilled tomatoes had also fungal growth in the cracks, while those of the heated tomato fruit did not. In the areas of chilling injury collapsed cells were present under the peel and could also support pathogen development. It is suggested that the heat treatment institutes a response to high temperature stress in the fruit tissue that leads to strengthened membranes. This prevents the loss of function and cell collapse which was found in the chilling‐injured areas of affected fruit.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Unheated tomatoes developed chilling injury and fungal infections at 2°C but not 12°C.

Outcome
chilling injury and fungal infectionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The unheated tomatoes developed chilling injury and fungal infections at 2°C, but not at 12°C.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 573–667 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All heat treatments reduced chilling injury and decay after three weeks at 2°C.

Treatment
heat treatmentse0
Outcome
chilling injury and decaye0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All the heat treatments reduced chilling injury and decay in tomatoes held for 3 weeks at 2°C.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 668–762 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heated tomatoes had higher outer-pericarp phospholipid content than unheated tomatoes.

Treatment
heatede0
Compound
phospholipide0
Outcome
phospholipide0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
unheated tomatoese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The outer pericarp tissue of heated tomatoes had higher phospholipid and lower sterol contents than unheated tomatoes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 763–881 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heated tomatoes had lower outer-pericarp sterol content than unheated tomatoes.

Treatment
heatede0
Compound
sterole0
Outcome
sterol contentse0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
unheated tomatoese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The outer pericarp tissue of heated tomatoes had higher phospholipid and lower sterol contents than unheated tomatoes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 763–881 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heated tomatoes had fewer saturated fatty acids than unheated tomatoes at 2°C, but not at 12°C.

Treatment
Heatede0
Outcome
saturated fatty acidse0
Direction
lesse0
Comparator
unheated tomatoese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Heated tomatoes also had less saturated fatty acids than unheated tomatoes held at 2°C, but not at 12°C.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 882–986 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microcracks occurred on all tomato fruit surfaces.

Outcome
microcrackse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“all the fruits had microcracks in their surface”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1041–1088 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungal growth occurred in cracks of unheated chilled tomato fruit but not heated fruit.

Outcome
fungal growthe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the unheated chilled tomatoes had also fungal growth in the cracks, while those of the heated tomato fruit did not.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1094–1209 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Collapsed cells under the peel occurred in chilling-injured areas.

Outcome
collapsed cellse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“In the areas of chilling injury collapsed cells were present under the peel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1210–1285 · show in text ↑

heat · crop injury · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.