Paper · 2015 · PLoS ONE

Evaluation of Wheat Chromosome Translocation Lines for High Temperature Stress Tolerance at Grain Filling Stage

Gautam Prasad Pradhan; P. V. Vara Prasad

13
claims
25
verbatim quotes
71
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

High temperature (HT, heat) stress is detrimental to wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) production. Wild relatives of bread wheat may offer sources of HT stress tolerance genes because they grow in stressed habitats. Wheat chromosome translocation lines, produced by introgressing small segments of chromosome from wild relatives to bread wheat, were evaluated for tolerance to HT stress during the grain filling stage. Sixteen translocation lines and four wheat cultivars were grown at optimum temperature (OT) of 22/14°C (day/night). Ten days after anthesis, half of the plants were exposed to HT stress of 34/26°C for 16 d, and other half remained at OT. Results showed that HT stress decreased grain yield by 43% compared with OT. Decrease in individual grain weight (by 44%) was the main reason for yield decline at HT. High temperature stress had adverse effects on leaf chlorophyll content and Fv/Fm; and a significant decrease in Fv/Fm was associated with a decline in individual grain weight. Based on the heat response (heat susceptibility indices, HSIs) of physiological and yield traits to each other and to yield HSI, TA5594, TA5617, and TA5088 were highly tolerant and TA5637 and TA5640 were highly susceptible to HT stress. Our results suggest that change in Fv/Fm is a highly useful trait in screening genotypes for HT stress tolerance. This study showed that there is genetic variability among wheat chromosome translocation lines for HT stress tolerance at the grain filling stage and we suggest further screening of a larger set of translocation lines.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heat stress decreased wheat grain yield by 43% relative to optimum temperature.

Treatment
HT stresse0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
43%e0
Comparator
OTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“HT stress decreased grain yield by 43% compared with OT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–727 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 53–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heat stress decreased individual wheat grain weight by 44%.

Treatment
HTe0
Outcome
individual grain weighte0
Direction
Decreasee0
Value
44%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Decrease in individual grain weight (by 44%) was the main reason for yield decline at HT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 729–817 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 53–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High temperature stress adversely affected wheat leaf chlorophyll content.

Treatment
High temperature stresse0
Outcome
leaf chlorophyll contente0
Direction
adverse effectse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“High temperature stress had adverse effects on leaf chlorophyll content and Fv/Fm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 819–900 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 53–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High temperature stress adversely affected wheat Fv/Fm.

Treatment
High temperature stresse0
Outcome
Fv/Fme0
Direction
adverse effectse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“High temperature stress had adverse effects on leaf chlorophyll content and Fv/Fm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 819–900 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 53–81 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

A significant decline in Fv/Fm was associated with reduced individual grain weight.

Outcome
individual grain weighte0
Direction
declinee0
Qualifier
significant decrease in Fv/Fme0
Comparator
Fv/Fme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a significant decrease in Fv/Fm was associated with a decline in individual grain weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 906–994 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 53–81 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TA5594 was highly tolerant to heat stress.

Material
TA5594e0
Outcome
highly tolerante0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“TA5594, TA5617, and TA5088 were highly tolerant and TA5637 and TA5640 were highly susceptible to HT stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1125–1231 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 53–81 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TA5617 was highly tolerant to heat stress.

Material
TA5617e0
Outcome
highly tolerante0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“TA5594, TA5617, and TA5088 were highly tolerant and TA5637 and TA5640 were highly susceptible to HT stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1125–1231 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 53–81 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TA5088 was highly tolerant to heat stress.

Material
TA5088e0
Outcome
highly tolerante0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“TA5594, TA5617, and TA5088 were highly tolerant and TA5637 and TA5640 were highly susceptible to HT stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1125–1231 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 53–81 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TA5637 was highly susceptible to heat stress.

Material
TA5637e0
Outcome
highly susceptiblee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“TA5594, TA5617, and TA5088 were highly tolerant and TA5637 and TA5640 were highly susceptible to HT stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1125–1231 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 53–81 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TA5640 was highly susceptible to heat stress.

Material
TA5640e0
Outcome
highly susceptiblee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“TA5594, TA5617, and TA5088 were highly tolerant and TA5637 and TA5640 were highly susceptible to HT stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1125–1231 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 53–81 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Change in Fv/Fm was judged useful for screening genotypes for heat stress tolerance.

Outcome
highly useful trait in screening genotypes for HT stress tolerancee0
Comparator
Fv/Fme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“change in Fv/Fm is a highly useful trait in screening genotypes for HT stress tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1258–1345 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 53–81 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat translocation lines showed genetic variability in heat tolerance at grain filling.

Material
wheat chromosome translocation linese0
Organ / stage
grain filling stagee0
Outcome
genetic variabilitye0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there is genetic variability among wheat chromosome translocation lines for HT stress tolerance at the grain filling stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1370–1492 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest screening a larger set of translocation lines.

Outcome
further screening of a larger set of translocation linese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“we suggest further screening of a larger set of translocation lines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1497–1564 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 53–81 · show in text ↑

heat · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

45 papers: 8 positive, 37 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

41 papers more in this group

See all 45 papers →

heat · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

90 papers: 17 positive, 73 negative or no effect

72 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

86 papers more in this group

See all 90 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.