Paper · 1979 · Agronomy Journal

Seed Size and Seeding Rate Effects upon Stand Density and Yield of Alfalfa1

C. S. Cooper; R. L. Ditterline; L. E. Welty

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
17
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Legume seedlings from seed of different sizes compete with one another in pure seedings, usually to the detriment of smaller seedlings. We seeded variable rates of sized‐seed at Bozeman, Mont., to determine if less competition would permit lowering the seeding rate of alfalfa. We screened alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.) seed to small, medium, and large sizes weighing 160, 210, and 256 mg/100 seed respectively, and also made up a composite of the three sizes. We planted seed of each size at seeding rates of 1.1, 2.2, 4.5, and 9.0 kg/ha into a Bozeman silt loam (Agric‐Pachic Cryoboroll) soil in the field and measured seedling emergence and survival and yield in the year following seeding. Number of seedlings that emerged and number of plants that survived the second year were closely related to seeding rate. Percentage of planted seeds, resulting in mature plants from two separate plantings, decreased with increased seeding rate due to more intraplant competition. More seedlings emerged from small seed, or from the seed composite of all sized‐seeds, than from medium or large seeds. Seed size did not affect yield in the year of seeding or the year following. A seeding rate as low as 1.1 kg/ha at one location and 2.2 kg/ha at a second location gave maximum yield in the year following seeding. Our data showed no advantage of sizing seed. Seedling density was as good or better with small or composited seed as with large seed at the same seeding rate.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seedling emergence and second-year survival were closely related to seeding rate.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
seeding ratee0
Outcome
Number of seedlings that emerged and number of plants that survived the second yeare0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Number of seedlings that emerged and number of plants that survived the second year were closely related to seeding rate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 703–824 · show in text ↑
t0

“Alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The percentage of planted seeds becoming mature plants decreased with higher seeding rate.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
increased seeding ratee0
Outcome
Percentage of planted seeds, resulting in mature plantse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Percentage of planted seeds, resulting in mature plants from two separate plantings, decreased with increased seeding rate due to more intraplant competition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–983 · show in text ↑
t0

“Alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

More seedlings emerged from small seeds than medium or large seeds.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
small seede0
Outcome
seedlings emergede0
Direction
Moree0
Comparator
medium or large seedse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“More seedlings emerged from small seed, or from the seed composite of all sized‐seeds, than from medium or large seeds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 984–1103 · show in text ↑
t0

“Alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

More seedlings emerged from composite seeds than medium or large seeds.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
seed composite of all sized‐seedse0
Outcome
seedlings emergede0
Direction
Moree0
Comparator
medium or large seedse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“More seedlings emerged from small seed, or from the seed composite of all sized‐seeds, than from medium or large seeds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 984–1103 · show in text ↑
t0

“Alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed size did not affect yield in the seeding year or following year.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
Seed sizee0
Outcome
yield in the year of seeding or the year followinge0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed size did not affect yield in the year of seeding or the year following.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1104–1180 · show in text ↑
t0

“Alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–74 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At one location 1.1 kg/ha produced maximum following-year yield.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
1.1 kg/hae0
Outcome
yield in the year following seedinge0
Direction
maximume0
Setting
one locatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A seeding rate as low as 1.1 kg/ha at one location and 2.2 kg/ha at a second location gave maximum yield in the year following seeding.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1316 · show in text ↑
t0

“Alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–74 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At a second location 2.2 kg/ha produced maximum following-year yield.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
2.2 kg/hae0
Outcome
yield in the year following seedinge0
Direction
maximume0
Setting
a second locatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A seeding rate as low as 1.1 kg/ha at one location and 2.2 kg/ha at a second location gave maximum yield in the year following seeding.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1316 · show in text ↑
t0

“Alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–74 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultno effectbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Sizing seed offered no advantage.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativat0
Outcome
no advantage of sizing seede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Our data showed no advantage of sizing seed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1317–1361 · show in text ↑
t0

“Alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Small seed produced seedling density as good as or better than large seed at the same rate.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
smalle0
Outcome
Seedling densitye0
Direction
as good or bettere0
Comparator
large seede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seedling density was as good or better with small or composited seed as with large seed at the same seeding rate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1362–1475 · show in text ↑
t0

“Alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Composite seed produced seedling density as good as or better than large seed at the same rate.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
composited seede0
Outcome
Seedling densitye0
Direction
as good or bettere0
Comparator
large seede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seedling density was as good or better with small or composited seed as with large seed at the same seeding rate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1362–1475 · show in text ↑
t0

“Alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–74 · show in text ↑

property · yield · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.