Paper · 2010 · Photosynthetica

Physiological response of non-Bt and Bt cotton to short-term drought stress

P. Parimala; K. Muthuchelian

4
claims
4
verbatim quotes
38
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Drought stress triggered the accumulation of malondialdehyde (MDA) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) both in non-Bt and Bt cotton with simultaneous production of antioxidant enzymes. And there was no significant difference between non-Bt and Bt cotton under drought stress. In contrast to this, we observed a significant reduction of Bt toxin proteins under 72 h of drought stress in Bt cotton.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stress increased malondialdehyde and hydrogen peroxide accumulation in both non-Bt and Bt cotton.

Taxon
non-Bt and Bt cottone0
Treatment
Drought stresse0
Outcome
accumulation of malondialdehyde (MDA) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2)e0
Direction
increaseinferrede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Drought stress triggered the accumulation of malondialdehyde (MDA) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) both in non-Bt and Bt cotton with simultaneous production of antioxidant enzymes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–176 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stress increased antioxidant enzyme production in both non-Bt and Bt cotton.

Taxon
non-Bt and Bt cottone0
Treatment
Drought stresse0
Outcome
production of antioxidant enzymese0
Direction
increaseinferrede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Drought stress triggered the accumulation of malondialdehyde (MDA) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) both in non-Bt and Bt cotton with simultaneous production of antioxidant enzymes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–176 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bt cotton showed no significant difference from non-Bt cotton under drought stress.

Taxon
Bt cottone1
Treatment
drought stresse1
Outcome
difference between non-Bt and Bt cottone1
Direction
no significant differencee1
Comparator
non-Bte1

Verbatim

e1

“And there was no significant difference between non-Bt and Bt cotton under drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 178–267 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bt toxin proteins were significantly reduced in Bt cotton after 72 h of drought stress.

Taxon
Bt cottone2
Treatment
72 h of drought stresse2
Outcome
Bt toxin proteinse2
Direction
reductione2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e2

“we observed a significant reduction of Bt toxin proteins under 72 h of drought stress in Bt cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 290–388 · show in text ↑

drought · organism · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

5 papers: 0 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.