Paper · 1997 · Canadian Journal of Microbiology

A gnotobiotic bioassay for studying interactions between potatoes and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria

Kenneth L. Conn; George Lazarovits; Jerzy Nowak

11
claims
21
verbatim quotes
73
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A gnotobiotic bioassay, using potato plantlets derived from single-node explants and grown in test tubes containing potato nodal cutting medium (PNCM), was found to be highly useful for investigations of direct growth promotion by a nonfluorescent Pseudomonas sp. strain PsJN. Strain PsJN was used to optimize and evaluate this bioassay for purposes of screening other rhizosphere bacteria and identification of Tn5 mutants of strain PsJN deficient in growth-promoting properties. The selection of potato cultivar used in this bioassay was critical, as growth promotion of potatoes by strain PsJN was cultivar specific. Inoculated plantlets of cultivars Norchip, Kennebec, Shepody, and Chaleur showed, in root dry weight, a five- to eight-fold increase, two- to three-fold increase, no response, and a decrease of 50%, respectively. Haulm dry weight followed similar trends but was not as consistent an indicator of growth promotion. Bioassay results were not altered to any extent by minor changes in PNCM composition or by slight changes in temperature and light conditions. A rapid method for preparation of bacterial suspensions and inoculation of explants was developed. Inoculation of three explants taken from 6-week-old stock plantlets of cv. Kennebec for each Tn5 transconjugate of strain PsJN (total of 1500 transconjugates) enabled the elimination of 93% of those isolates that retained growth-promoting activity. The remaining 7% of isolates were retested and seven were confirmed to have lost growth-promoting ability. Bacteria from different genera were also screened with this bioassay. None of these bacteria increased the growth of potato plantlets, but several inhibited root and haulm growth.Key words: plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria, gnotobiotic, tissue culture, nonfluorescent pseudomonad, bacterium, potato.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The gnotobiotic potato bioassay was highly useful for testing growth promotion by PsJN.

Interactor
Pseudomonas sp. strain PsJNPseudomonas sp.e0other
Outcome
highly useful for investigations of direct growth promotione0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas sp.
Pseudomonas sp. · Interactor · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)CDC · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A gnotobiotic bioassay, using potato plantlets derived from single-node explants and grown in test tubes containing potato nodal cutting medium (PNCM), was found to be highly useful for investigations of direct growth promotion by a nonfluorescent Pseudomonas sp. strain PsJN.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–276 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PsJN increased root dry weight five- to eight-fold in Norchip.

Taxon
potatoesSolanum tuberosume1
Material
Norchipe0
Treatment
Inoculatede0
Interactor
strain PsJNe1other
Outcome
root dry weighte0
Direction
increasee0
Value
five- to eight-folde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculated plantlets of cultivars Norchip, Kennebec, Shepody, and Chaleur showed, in root dry weight, a five- to eight-fold increase, two- to three-fold increase, no response, and a decrease of 50%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–832 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth promotion of potatoes by strain PsJN was cultivar specific”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–618 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PsJN increased root dry weight two- to three-fold in Kennebec.

Taxon
potatoesSolanum tuberosume1
Material
Kennebece0
Treatment
Inoculatede0
Interactor
strain PsJNe1other
Outcome
root dry weighte0
Direction
increasee0
Value
two- to three-folde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculated plantlets of cultivars Norchip, Kennebec, Shepody, and Chaleur showed, in root dry weight, a five- to eight-fold increase, two- to three-fold increase, no response, and a decrease of 50%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–832 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth promotion of potatoes by strain PsJN was cultivar specific”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–618 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shepody root dry weight did not respond to PsJN inoculation.

Taxon
potatoesSolanum tuberosume1
Material
Shepodye0
Treatment
Inoculatede0
Interactor
strain PsJNe1other
Outcome
root dry weighte0
Direction
no responsee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculated plantlets of cultivars Norchip, Kennebec, Shepody, and Chaleur showed, in root dry weight, a five- to eight-fold increase, two- to three-fold increase, no response, and a decrease of 50%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–832 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth promotion of potatoes by strain PsJN was cultivar specific”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–618 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PsJN reduced Chaleur root dry weight by 50%.

Taxon
potatoesSolanum tuberosume1
Material
Chaleure0
Treatment
Inoculatede0
Interactor
strain PsJNe1other
Outcome
root dry weighte0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
50%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculated plantlets of cultivars Norchip, Kennebec, Shepody, and Chaleur showed, in root dry weight, a five- to eight-fold increase, two- to three-fold increase, no response, and a decrease of 50%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–832 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth promotion of potatoes by strain PsJN was cultivar specific”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–618 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Haulm dry weight followed root trends but was less consistent as an indicator.

Taxon
potatoesSolanum tuberosumt0
Outcome
Haulm dry weighte0
Comparator
growth promotione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Haulm dry weight followed similar trends but was not as consistent an indicator of growth promotion.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 833–933 · show in text ↑
t0

“potatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–65 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Minor medium, temperature and light changes did not materially change bioassay results.

Taxon
potatoesSolanum tuberosumt0
Outcome
Bioassay resultse0
Direction
not alterede0
Comparator
minor changes in PNCM compositione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bioassay results were not altered to any extent by minor changes in PNCM composition or by slight changes in temperature and light conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 934–1076 · show in text ↑
t0

“potatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–65 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Screening eliminated 93% of transconjugates retaining growth-promotion activity.

Taxon
potatoesSolanum tuberosumt0
Outcome
eliminatione0
Value
93%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“enabled the elimination of 93% of those isolates that retained growth-promoting activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1335–1423 · show in text ↑
t0

“potatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–65 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seven retested isolates were confirmed to have lost growth-promoting ability.

Taxon
potatoesSolanum tuberosumt0
Outcome
lost growth-promoting abilitye0
Value
sevene0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seven were confirmed to have lost growth-promoting ability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1472–1530 · show in text ↑
t0

“potatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Other bacterial genera did not increase potato plantlet growth.

Treatment
Bacteria from different generae1
Interactor
bacteriaBacteriae0other
Outcome
growth of potato plantletse0
Direction
None of these bacteria increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“None of these bacteria increased the growth of potato plantlets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1602–1665 · show in text ↑
e1

“Bacteria from different genera were also screened with this bioassay.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1532–1601 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Several other bacterial isolates inhibited potato root and haulm growth.

Treatment
Bacteria from different generae1
Interactor
bacteriaBacteriae0other
Outcome
root and haulm growthe0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“None of these bacteria increased the growth of potato plantlets, but several inhibited root and haulm growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1602–1711 · show in text ↑
e1

“Bacteria from different genera were also screened with this bioassay.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1532–1601 · show in text ↑

inoculation · Bacteria · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

inoculation · growth · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

104 papers: 82 positive, 22 negative or no effect

81 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

100 papers more in this group

See all 104 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.