Paper · 2003 · The Journal of Agricultural Science

Effect of several germination conditions on total P, phytate P, phytase, acid phosphatase activities and inositol phosphate esters in spring and winter wheat

C. CENTENO; A. VIVEROS; A. BRENES; et al.

8
claims
8
verbatim quotes
11
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Changes in the wheat phosphatases (phytase-Phy and acid phosphatase-AcPh) and the degradation of their substrates (inositol phosphates esters) during seed germination have been examined in two studies. Germinated grains with high phytate degrading enzymes are of potential interest in the improvement of phosphorus availability in monogastric animals. In the first study, the seeds were soaked for 1 and 14 h and germinated for 3 and 5 days with and without the addition of gibberellic acid (GA3). In the second study, the seeds were soaked for 1 h and germinated for 1, 3 and 5 days with GA3. Phytase (up to 1800 and 1573 U/kg) and acid phosphatase (up to 13 115 and 10 154 U/g) activities and IP 6 (6·96 and 7·67 mg/g), IP 5 (0·40 and 0·60 mg/g) and IP 4 (0·04 and 0·04 mg/g) were detected in ungerminated spring and winter wheat, respectively. The germination process caused a significant increase of Phy and AcPh activities in spring (up to 275 and 235%) and winter wheat (up to 250 and 329%) and a reduction in the phytate phosphorus content (up to 35 and 64%, respectively). Phytate phosphorus content was affected in both spring and winter wheat by the soaking time. Finally, during the course of germination, IP 6 and IP 5 were more rapidly degraded in winter wheat (62 and 62%) than in spring wheat (32 and 29%), and IP 4 was only a short-living intermediate, which was increased during hydrolysis and degraded to IP 3 . In conclusion, the germination process caused a significant increase of Phy and AcPh in spring and winter wheat, which was accompanied with a significant reduction of phytate phosphorus content and an increase in the content of lower inositol phosphates.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Germination increased Phy activity in spring wheat up to 275%.

Taxon
springe0
Treatment
germination processe0
Outcome
Phye0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Verbatim

e0

“The germination process caused a significant increase of Phy and AcPh activities in spring (up to 275 and 235%) and winter wheat (up to 250 and 329%) and a reduction in the phytate phosphorus content (up to 35 and 64%, respectively).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–1080 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Germination increased AcPh activity in spring wheat up to 235%.

Taxon
springe0
Treatment
germination processe0
Outcome
AcPhe0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Verbatim

e0

“The germination process caused a significant increase of Phy and AcPh activities in spring (up to 275 and 235%) and winter wheat (up to 250 and 329%) and a reduction in the phytate phosphorus content (up to 35 and 64%, respectively).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–1080 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Germination increased Phy activity in winter wheat wheat up to 250%.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
germination processe0
Outcome
Phye0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The germination process caused a significant increase of Phy and AcPh activities in spring (up to 275 and 235%) and winter wheat (up to 250 and 329%) and a reduction in the phytate phosphorus content (up to 35 and 64%, respectively).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–1080 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Germination increased AcPh activity in winter wheat wheat up to 329%.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
germination processe0
Outcome
AcPhe0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The germination process caused a significant increase of Phy and AcPh activities in spring (up to 275 and 235%) and winter wheat (up to 250 and 329%) and a reduction in the phytate phosphorus content (up to 35 and 64%, respectively).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–1080 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Germination reduced phytate phosphorus content in spring and winter wheat.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
germination processe0
Outcome
phytate phosphorus contente0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The germination process caused a significant increase of Phy and AcPh activities in spring (up to 275 and 235%) and winter wheat (up to 250 and 329%) and a reduction in the phytate phosphorus content (up to 35 and 64%, respectively).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–1080 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soaking time affected phytate phosphorus content.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
soaking timee0
Outcome
Phytate phosphorus contente0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phytate phosphorus content was affected in both spring and winter wheat by the soaking time.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1081–1173 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IP 6 and IP 5 degraded more rapidly in winter than spring wheat.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Outcome
IP 6 and IP 5e0
Direction
more rapidly degradede0
Comparator
spring wheate0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“IP 6 and IP 5 were more rapidly degraded in winter wheat (62 and 62%) than in spring wheat (32 and 29%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1217–1320 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IP 4 rose during hydrolysis and then degraded to IP 3.

Outcome
IP 4e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“IP 4 was only a short-living intermediate, which was increased during hydrolysis and degraded to IP 3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1326–1427 · show in text ↑

processing · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 7 positive, 6 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.