Paper · 2013 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

ROOT FERRIC CHELATE REDUCTASE IS REGULATED BY IRON AND COPPER IN STRAWBERRY PLANTS

Maribela Pestana; Pedro José Correia; Teresa Saavedra; et al.

9
claims
9
verbatim quotes
14
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In the present experiment, we studied the interaction between copper (Cu) and iron (Fe) in strawberry plants grown in nutrient solutions containing different concentrations of Fe. Plants grown in the absence of iron (Fe0) had the characteristic symptoms of Fe deficiency, with smaller chlorotic leaves, less biomass, acidification of the nutrient solution, and roots that were smaller and less ramified, while no symptoms of Fe deficiency were observed in plants grown with Fe. A greater amount of Cu was found in roots of chlorotic plants than in those grown with Fe, while plants grown with 20 μM of Fe (Fe20) in the nutrient solution had a greater amount of Fe compared with plants from the other treatments. Chlorotic plants (Fe0) and plants grown with the greatest level of Fe (Fe20) had a greater root ferric chelate reductase (FC-R; EC 1.16.1.17) activity compared with the other treatments with 5 or 10 μM Fe in the nutrient solution. The same pattern was obtained for relative FC-R mRNA concentration and for the sum of Fe and Cu contents in shoots (leaves plus crowns). The DNA obtained from amplification of the FC-R mRNA was cloned and several of the inserts analysed by single strand confirmation polymorphism (SSCP). Although there were different SSCP patterns in the Fe20 treatment, all the inserts that were sequenced were very similar, excluding the hypothesis of more than one FC-R mRNA species being present. The results suggest that Cu as well as Fe is involved in FC-R expression and activity, although the mechanism involved in this regulation is unknown so far. Both small contents of Fe and Cu in plants led to an over-expression of the FC-R gene and enhanced FC-R activity in strawberry roots.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Iron deprivation produced chlorotic leaves and reduced biomass and root development.

Taxon
PlantsViridiplantaee0
Treatment
absence of iron (Fe0)e0
Outcome
smaller chlorotic leaves, less biomasse0
Direction
smallere0
Comparator
plants grown with Fee0

Verbatim

e0

“Plants grown in the absence of iron (Fe0) had the characteristic symptoms of Fe deficiency, with smaller chlorotic leaves, less biomass, acidification of the nutrient solution, and roots that were smaller and less ramified, while no symptoms of Fe deficiency were observed in plants grown with Fe”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 180–476 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Iron deprivation acidified the nutrient solution.

Taxon
PlantsViridiplantaee0
Treatment
absence of iron (Fe0)e0
Outcome
acidification of the nutrient solutione0
Direction
acidificatione0
Comparator
plants grown with Fee0

Verbatim

e0

“Plants grown in the absence of iron (Fe0) had the characteristic symptoms of Fe deficiency, with smaller chlorotic leaves, less biomass, acidification of the nutrient solution, and roots that were smaller and less ramified, while no symptoms of Fe deficiency were observed in plants grown with Fe”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 180–476 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorotic roots contained more copper than roots grown with iron.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee0
Organ / stage
rootse0
Outcome
amount of Cue0
Direction
greatere0

Verbatim

e0

“A greater amount of Cu was found in roots of chlorotic plants than in those grown with Fe”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 478–567 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plants given 20 μM iron contained more iron than other treatments.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee0
Treatment
20 μM of Fe (Fe20)e0
Outcome
amount of Fee0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
plants from the other treatmentse0

Verbatim

e0

“plants grown with 20 μM of Fe (Fe20) in the nutrient solution had a greater amount of Fe compared with plants from the other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–710 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fe0 and Fe20 plants had greater root ferric chelate reductase activity than Fe5 or Fe10 plants.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee0
Treatment
Fe0e0
Outcome
root ferric chelate reductase (FC-R; EC 1.16.1.17) activitye0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
5 or 10 μM Fee0

Verbatim

e0

“Chlorotic plants (Fe0) and plants grown with the greatest level of Fe (Fe20) had a greater root ferric chelate reductase (FC-R; EC 1.16.1.17) activity compared with the other treatments with 5 or 10 μM Fe in the nutrient solution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 712–941 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative FC-R mRNA and shoot Fe plus Cu followed the same treatment pattern.

Taxon
shootse0
Outcome
relative FC-R mRNA concentration and for the sum of Fe and Cu contentse0
Direction
same patterne0

Verbatim

e0

“The same pattern was obtained for relative FC-R mRNA concentration and for the sum of Fe and Cu contents in shoots (leaves plus crowns)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 943–1078 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sequenced FC-R inserts were very similar despite different Fe20 SSCP patterns.

Taxon
Fe20e0
Outcome
inserts that were sequenced were very similare0

Verbatim

e0

“Although there were different SSCP patterns in the Fe20 treatment, all the inserts that were sequenced were very similar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1231–1351 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors infer copper and iron regulate FC-R expression and activity.

Taxon
Fee0
Gene
FC-Re0
Outcome
FC-R expression and activitye0
Qualifier
Cu as well as Fee0

Verbatim

e0

“Cu as well as Fe is involved in FC-R expression and activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1453–1513 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low iron and copper contents led to FC-R gene overexpression and increased activity.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Gene
FC-R genee0
Outcome
over-expression of the FC-R gene and enhanced FC-R activitye0
Qualifier
small contents of Fe and Cue0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both small contents of Fe and Cu in plants led to an over-expression of the FC-R gene and enhanced FC-R activity in strawberry roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1585–1717 · show in text ↑

iron atom · nutrient: content · Viridiplantae (plants)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
    Withholding Fe increased uptake of all ions except ammonium in ammonium-fed chickpea.

    Mineral nutrition of chickpea plants supplied with NO 3 or NH 4 N · 1990 · compared with NH4‐fed plants

    Opposite directionAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

  2. no effect
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

iron atom · growth · Viridiplantae (plants)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

This paper is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.

  1. negative
    Combined Fe and Mn omission gave better growth than Mn omission with Fe.

    Some problems in the study of simultaneous multiple nutrient deficiencies in plants · 1980 · compared with no Mn with Fe

    Opposite directionAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

  2. negative
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.