Paper · 2002 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

WHEAT RESPONSE TO NITROGEN SOURCE UNDER SALINE CONDITIONS

M. Irshad; T. Honna; A. E. Eneji; et al.

14
claims
27
verbatim quotes
54
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT The influence of nitrogen (N) sources on biomass yield and nutrient uptake of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under saline conditions was studied in a greenhouse experiment. Six different forms of N {nitrate-N as Ca(NO3)2, urea-N [CO(NH2)2], ammonium-N as (NH4)2SO4, nitrate-N+urea-N, nitrate-N+ammonium-N and a control (no N fertilizer)} were factorially combined with three levels of salinity to give a total of 18 treatments that were replicated three times. Each of the five levels of applied N was at the rate of 100 kg ha−1. The salinity levels (ECe) were 6.2 and 12.1 dSm−1, denoted as S 1 and S 2 and untreated soil (S 0), respectively. A basal dose of phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) was also applied. Five wheat plants were grown in each pot for six weeks. Data were collected for shoot and root biomass and shoot samples were analyzed for N, P, K, calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg), sodium (Na), chloride (Cl), and micronutrients contents. Plant growth and nutrient uptake were influenced by both salinity and source of N. As expected, increasing salinity decreased dry matter production of shoot and root, whereas N application increased plant growth across all levels of salinity. The total dry biomass (shoot and root) of wheat was significantly higher in combined N treatments than in single sources. Irrespective of N forms most of the nutrient concentrations in the shoot was increased with increasing level of salinity. Among the fertilizers the concentration of cation was higher in nitrate-treated plants than in other forms of N. Ammonium-N and urea-N tended to inhibit the uptake of cations compared to nitrate-N under saline conditions. The trend for P and Cl concentration was almost opposite to that of cations concentration in the shoot. The uptake of nutrients seemed to be influenced by cation–anion balance in soil-plant system. Nitrogen concentration of shoot was greatly enhanced by all forms of N in the following order: Ni>NiAm>Am>NiUr>Ur>control. The interactive effect of salinity and fertilizer on iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), and zinc (Zn) contents was not consistent. Among the fertilizers the concentration of trace elements in the shoot was also not significantly different. It was concluded that the plant growth and nutrient concentration of shoot could depend upon N source and level of salinity. The mixed application of both ammoniacal and nitrate forms of N could possibly be conducive to plant growth in salt affected soils.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing salinity decreased shoot dry matter.

Treatment
increasing salinitye0
Outcome
dry matter production of shoote0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increasing salinity decreased dry matter production of shoot and root”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1118 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing salinity decreased root dry matter.

Treatment
increasing salinitye0
Outcome
dry matter production of shoot and roote0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increasing salinity decreased dry matter production of shoot and root”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1118 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N application increased growth at all salinity levels.

Treatment
N applicatione0
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N application increased plant growth across all levels of salinity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1128–1195 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined nitrogen sources yielded more total dry biomass than single sources.

Treatment
combined N treatmentse0
Outcome
total dry biomass (shoot and root)e0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
single sourcese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The total dry biomass (shoot and root) of wheat was significantly higher in combined N treatments than in single sources.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1196–1317 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot nutrient concentrations generally increased with salinity.

Treatment
increasing level of salinitye0
Outcome
nutrient concentrations in the shoote0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrespective of N forms most of the nutrient concentrations in the shoot was increased with increasing level of salinity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1318–1439 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrate treatment gave higher cation concentration than other nitrogen forms.

Treatment
nitrate-treatede0
Outcome
concentration of catione0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other forms of Ne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the concentration of cation was higher in nitrate-treated plants than in other forms of N.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1462–1552 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium nitrogen inhibited cation uptake relative to nitrate under salinity.

Treatment
Ammonium-Ne0
Outcome
uptake of cationse0
Direction
inhibite0
Comparator
nitrate-Ne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ammonium-N and urea-N tended to inhibit the uptake of cations compared to nitrate-N under saline conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1553–1661 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea nitrogen inhibited cation uptake relative to nitrate under salinity.

Treatment
urea-Ne0
Outcome
uptake of cationse0
Direction
inhibite0
Comparator
nitrate-Ne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ammonium-N and urea-N tended to inhibit the uptake of cations compared to nitrate-N under saline conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1553–1661 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot phosphorus and chloride concentration followed a trend opposite cations.

Outcome
P and Cl concentratione0
Qualifier
almost opposite to that of cations concentratione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The trend for P and Cl concentration was almost opposite to that of cations concentration in the shoot.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1662–1765 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N uptake appeared influenced by soil–plant cation–anion balance.

Outcome
uptake of nutrientse0
Qualifier
cation–anion balance in soil-plant systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The uptake of nutrients seemed to be influenced by cation–anion balance in soil-plant system.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1766–1859 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All forms of N enhanced shoot N concentration in the stated rank order.

Treatment
all forms of Ne0
Outcome
Nitrogen concentration of shoote0
Direction
enhancede0
Qualifier
Ni>NiAm>Am>NiUr>Ur>controle0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen concentration of shoot was greatly enhanced by all forms of N in the following order: Ni>NiAm>Am>NiUr>Ur>control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1860–1982 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity–fertilizer interactions on Fe, Mn and Zn were inconsistent.

Outcome
iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), and zinc (Zn) contentse0
Qualifier
not consistente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The interactive effect of salinity and fertilizer on iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), and zinc (Zn) contents was not consistent.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1983–2105 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer treatments did not significantly differ in shoot trace element concentration.

Treatment
fertilizerse0
Outcome
concentration of trace elements in the shoote0
Direction
not significantly differente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among the fertilizers the concentration of trace elements in the shoot was also not significantly different.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2106–2214 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors suggest mixed ammoniacal and nitrate N could favor growth in saline soils.

Outcome
mixed application of both ammoniacal and nitrate forms of N could possibly be conducive to plant growthe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The mixed application of both ammoniacal and nitrate forms of N could possibly be conducive to plant growth in salt affected soils.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2340–2471 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑

salinity · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

227 papers: 30 positive, 197 negative or no effect

196 papers in the same direction as this paper · 30 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

223 papers more in this group

See all 227 papers →

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

288 papers: 232 positive, 56 negative or no effect

55 papers in the same direction as this paper · 232 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

284 papers more in this group

See all 288 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

479 papers: 410 positive, 69 negative or no effect

68 papers in the same direction as this paper · 410 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

475 papers more in this group

See all 479 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

551 papers: 426 positive, 125 negative or no effect

425 papers in the same direction as this paper · 116 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

547 papers more in this group

See all 551 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.