Paper · 2007 · Grassland Science

Ensilage of wilted whole crop rice (Oryza sativa L.) using a roll baler for chopped material: Silage quality in long‐term storage

Hidenori Kawamoto; Ryuji Otani; Akinori Oshibe; et al.

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract We examined the effects of long‐term storage on the fermentation quality, chemical composition, and digestibility of wilted whole crop rice silage prepared using a roll baler for chopped material (set chop length, 13 mm) and compared the results with those obtained by using a conventional roll baler. The roll balers were used for ensiling whole crop rice of three types: (i) dough‐ripe stage with light wilting (45% dry matter); (ii) dough‐ripe stage with heavy wilting (65% dry matter); and (iii) yellow‐ripe stage with light wilting (45% dry matter). The apparent dry matter density was higher in the ensiled roll bales composed of chopped whole crop rice (chopped bales) than in those composed of non‐chopped whole crop rice (conventional bales) (195–250 kg m −3 vs 156–218 kg m −3 , respectively). The formation of volatile fatty acids and ammonia‐nitrogen was low in all types of silage. Further, no marked differences in the chemical composition and apparent dry matter digestibility were observed between silage from the two types of bales. However, there were significant differences in their lactic acid and ethanol contents. The lactic acid production in the conventional silage was low (0.08–0.14% fresh matter), whereas that in the chopped silage was high (0.71–0.97% fresh matter). A lower pH value (pH 4.0–4.3) was retained in the chopped silage after 10 months of storage. High ethanol production (1.1–2.5% fresh matter) was observed in the conventional silage, whereas ethanol production decreased to less than 1% in the chopped silage. These results indicate that although the ethanol fermentation is readily enhanced in the ensilage of wilted whole crop rice performed by a conventional baler, the ensilage performed by a baler for chopped material encourages lactic acid fermentation and suppresses ethanol production over a wide moisture range throughout the long‐term storage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chopped rice bales had higher dry matter density than conventional bales.

Taxon
whole crop ricee0
Treatment
chopped balese0
Outcome
apparent dry matter densitye0
Direction
highere0
Value
195–250 kg m −3e0
Qualifier
156–218 kg m −3e0
Comparator
conventional balese0

Verbatim

e0

“The apparent dry matter density was higher in the ensiled roll bales composed of chopped whole crop rice (chopped bales) than in those composed of non‐chopped whole crop rice (conventional bales) (195–250 kg m −3 vs 156–218 kg m −3 , respectively).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 564–812 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Volatile fatty acid and ammonia nitrogen formation was low across silage types.

Taxon
whole crop ricet0
Outcome
formation of volatile fatty acids and ammonia‐nitrogene0
Direction
lowe0

Verbatim

e0

“The formation of volatile fatty acids and ammonia‐nitrogen was low in all types of silage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 813–903 · show in text ↑
t0

“whole crop rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chemical composition did not markedly differ between chopped and conventional silage.

Taxon
whole crop ricet0
Treatment
two types of balese0
Outcome
chemical compositione0
Direction
no marked differencese0
Comparator
silagee0

Verbatim

e0

“no marked differences in the chemical composition and apparent dry matter digestibility were observed between silage from the two types of bales.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–1058 · show in text ↑
t0

“whole crop rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apparent dry matter digestibility did not markedly differ between silage bale types.

Taxon
whole crop ricet0
Treatment
two types of balese0
Outcome
apparent dry matter digestibilitye0
Direction
no marked differencese0
Comparator
silagee0

Verbatim

e0

“no marked differences in the chemical composition and apparent dry matter digestibility were observed between silage from the two types of bales.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–1058 · show in text ↑
t0

“whole crop rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–52 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional silage had low lactic acid production.

Taxon
whole crop ricet0
Outcome
lactic acid productione0
Direction
lowe0
Value
0.08–0.14% fresh mattere0

Verbatim

e0

“The lactic acid production in the conventional silage was low (0.08–0.14% fresh matter)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1146–1233 · show in text ↑
t0

“whole crop rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chopped silage had high lactic acid production.

Taxon
whole crop ricet0
Treatment
chopped silagee0
Outcome
lactic acid productione0
Direction
highe0
Value
0.71–0.97% fresh mattere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The lactic acid production in the conventional silage was low (0.08–0.14% fresh matter), whereas that in the chopped silage was high (0.71–0.97% fresh matter).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1146–1305 · show in text ↑
t0

“whole crop rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–52 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chopped silage retained pH 4.0–4.3 after ten months.

Taxon
whole crop ricet0
Outcome
pH valuee0
Direction
lowere0
Value
pH 4.0–4.3e0
Qualifier
after 10 months of storagee0

Verbatim

e0

“A lower pH value (pH 4.0–4.3) was retained in the chopped silage after 10 months of storage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1306–1398 · show in text ↑
t0

“whole crop rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–52 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional silage showed high ethanol production.

Taxon
whole crop ricet0
Outcome
ethanol productione0
Direction
Highe0
Value
1.1–2.5% fresh mattere0

Verbatim

e0

“High ethanol production (1.1–2.5% fresh matter) was observed in the conventional silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1399–1486 · show in text ↑
t0

“whole crop rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chopping decreased ethanol production below one percent.

Taxon
whole crop ricet0
Treatment
chopped silagee0
Outcome
ethanol productione0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
less than 1%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“ethanol production decreased to less than 1% in the chopped silage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1496–1563 · show in text ↑
t0

“whole crop rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–52 · show in text ↑

processing · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

114 papers: 88 positive, 26 negative or no effect

87 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

110 papers more in this group

See all 114 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.