Paper · 2006 · Compost Science & Utilization

Evaluation of Pine Bark or Pine Bark with Goat Manure or Sewage Sludge Cocomposts As Growing Media for Vegetable Seedlings

L.T. Mupondi; P. N. S. Mnkeni; M.O. Brutsch

6
claims
18
verbatim quotes
21
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The suitability as growing media of composts made from pine bark or pine bark cocomposted with goat manure or sewage sludge and either inoculated or not inoculated with effective microorganisms, was evaluated under greenhouse conditions with and without fertilization using cabbage as the test crop. The treatments were replicated three times and arranged in a randomized complete block design in a fibre glass covered greenhouse. Cabbage seedlings were grown in cavity trays for five weeks, after which plants were harvested and fresh and dry weights determined. Samples were also analyzed for N, P, K and selected heavy metal concentrations. Results revealed that pine bark-goat manure cocomposts supported good seedling growth and could thus be good substitutes for pine bark alone as a growing medium where goat manure or similar manures are available. The results also showed that despite the superior nutritional value of these alternative growing media, nutrient supplementation may still be necessary where seedlings are kept in the nursery for extended periods due to nutrient exhaustion through plant uptake and leaching. Pine bark-sewage sludge compost also had positive effects on seedling growth but could only be recommended as a growing medium for nonfood plants because its composting did not reach the thermophillic temperatures necessary for adequate pathogen kill. Inoculation with effective microorganisms improved seedling growth in sewage sludge and goat manure based composts but the mechanisms involved remain to be established.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pine bark-goat manure cocompost supported good cabbage seedling growth.

Treatment
pine bark-goat manure cocompostse0
Outcome
seedling growthe0
Direction
goode0
Comparator
pine bark alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pine bark-goat manure cocomposts supported good seedling growth and could thus be good substitutes for pine bark alone as a growing medium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 666–804 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vegetable Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–122 · show in text ↑
e1

“using cabbage as the test crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 268–298 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pine bark-sewage sludge compost had positive effects on cabbage seedling growth.

Treatment
Pine bark-sewage sludge composte0
Outcome
seedling growthe0
Direction
positive effectse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pine bark-sewage sludge compost also had positive effects on seedling growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1132–1208 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vegetable Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–122 · show in text ↑
e1

“using cabbage as the test crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 268–298 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Effective microorganism inoculation improved seedling growth in sewage sludge compost.

Treatment
Inoculation with effective microorganismse0
Interactor
effective microorganismse0symbiont
Outcome
seedling growthe0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
sewage sludgee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation with effective microorganisms improved seedling growth in sewage sludge and goat manure based composts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1384–1498 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vegetable Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–122 · show in text ↑
e1

“using cabbage as the test crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 268–298 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Effective microorganism inoculation improved seedling growth in goat manure compost.

Treatment
Inoculation with effective microorganismse0
Interactor
effective microorganismse0symbiont
Outcome
seedling growthe0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
goat manuree0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation with effective microorganisms improved seedling growth in sewage sludge and goat manure based composts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1384–1498 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vegetable Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–122 · show in text ↑
e1

“using cabbage as the test crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 268–298 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Nutrient supplementation may be needed for seedlings kept longer in the nursery.

Outcome
nutrient supplementation may still be necessarye0
Qualifier
extended periodse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nutrient supplementation may still be necessary where seedlings are kept in the nursery for extended periods due to nutrient exhaustion through plant uptake and leaching”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–1130 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vegetable Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–122 · show in text ↑
e1

“using cabbage as the test crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 268–298 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Sewage sludge compost was recommended only for nonfood plants because composting did not reach pathogen-killing temperatures.

Outcome
growing medium for nonfood plantse0
Qualifier
did not reach the thermophillic temperatures necessary for adequate pathogen kille0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“could only be recommended as a growing medium for nonfood plants because its composting did not reach the thermophillic temperatures necessary for adequate pathogen kill”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1213–1382 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vegetable Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–122 · show in text ↑
e1

“using cabbage as the test crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 268–298 · show in text ↑

organic · growth · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 9 positive, 2 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

inoculation · growth · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

58 papers: 49 positive, 9 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

54 papers more in this group

See all 58 papers →

fertilization · growth · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

264 papers: 240 positive, 24 negative or no effect

239 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

260 papers more in this group

See all 264 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.