Paper · 2004 · Journal of Food Processing and Preservation

HIGH HYDROSTATIC PRESSURE PROCESSING OF PEACH PUREE WITH AND WITHOUT ANTIBROWNING AGENTS

JOSÉ A. GUERRERO-BELTRÁN; GUSTAVO V. BARBOSA-CÁNOVAS; BARRY G. SWANSON

6
claims
7
verbatim quotes
57
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

High hydrostatic pressure (HHP) (103 to 517 MPa) was applied for selected times (5 to 25 min) on peach puree with and without the addition of antibrowning agents (1000 ppm ascorbic acid or 300 ppm cysteine). Polyphenoloxidase (PPO) activity was assessed before and after HHP processing. Peach purees were stored at 3C for 13 days and then at 22C for 15 additional days. A zp value of 224 MPa, in a range from 207 to 517 MPa of pressure, was obtained for peach puree without the addition of antibrowning agents. PPO activation at 103, 207 and 310 MPa or inhibition at 414 and 517 MPa was observed in peach purees containing added ascorbic acid. More than 50% inactivation of PPO was observed after adding cysteine to the peach puree and 99% inhibition was observed after 517 MPa of pressure at the experimental times. The higher the pressure treatment and the longer the treatment time for inactivating PPO, the less the discoloration of the peach puree with and without antibrowning agents during storage at low temperatures.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A pressure sensitivity value of 224 MPa was obtained for peach puree without antibrowning agents.

Outcome
zp valuee0
Value
224 MPae0
Qualifier
without the addition of antibrowning agentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A zp value of 224 MPa, in a range from 207 to 517 MPa of pressure, was obtained for peach puree without the addition of antibrowning agents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 370–509 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With ascorbic acid, PPO was activated at 103, 207 and 310 MPa.

Treatment
103, 207 and 310 MPae0
Outcome
PPO activatione0
Direction
activatione0
Qualifier
added ascorbic acide0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PPO activation at 103, 207 and 310 MPa or inhibition at 414 and 517 MPa was observed in peach purees containing added ascorbic acid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 511–642 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With ascorbic acid, PPO was inhibited at 414 and 517 MPa.

Treatment
414 and 517 MPae0
Outcome
PPOe0
Direction
inhibitione0
Qualifier
added ascorbic acide0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PPO activation at 103, 207 and 310 MPa or inhibition at 414 and 517 MPa was observed in peach purees containing added ascorbic acid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 511–642 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding cysteine inactivated more than 50% of PPO.

Treatment
adding cysteinee0
Outcome
PPOe0
Direction
inactivatione0
Value
More than 50%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“More than 50% inactivation of PPO was observed after adding cysteine to the peach puree”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 644–731 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 517 MPa after cysteine addition, PPO inhibition reached 99%.

Treatment
517 MPa of pressuree0
Outcome
inhibitione0
Direction
inhibitione0
Value
99%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“99% inhibition was observed after 517 MPa of pressure at the experimental times”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–815 · show in text ↑
e1

“cysteine to the peach puree”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 704–731 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher pressure and longer treatment reduced discoloration during cool storage.

Treatment
pressure treatmente0
Outcome
discoloration of the peach pureee0
Direction
lesse0
Setting
storage at low temperaturese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The higher the pressure treatment and the longer the treatment time for inactivating PPO, the less the discoloration of the peach puree with and without antibrowning agents during storage at low temperatures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 817–1024 · show in text ↑

cysteine · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.