Paper · 2005 · Functional Plant Biology

A wheat genotype developed for rapid leaf growth copes well with the physical and biological constraints of unploughed soil

Michelle Watt; John A. Kirkegaard; Gregory J. Rebetzke

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
120
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Conventional wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars grow slowly in unploughed soil because of physical and biological constraints. Here a conventional cultivar (Janz) is compared with a novel experimental line (Vigour 18), bred for high leaf vigour, to explore the hypothesis that a vigorous wheat grows better in unploughed soil. Roots of both genotypes in unploughed soil were three times more distorted with 30% shorter apices and 60% shorter expansion zones than roots in ploughed soil, because of voids between blocky peds and packed sand particles that impeded root apices. More than half the root length contacted dead, remnant roots. Vigour 18 roots grew 39% faster, were thicker and distorted less than Janz roots in unploughed soil, but developed similarly in ploughed soil. Vigour 18 shoots grew 64% faster in unploughed soil, but 15% faster in ploughed soil. Fumigation of unploughed soil improved the growth of Janz only. We suggest that faster root growth, different exudates promoting a more beneficial rhizosphere microflora, or modified shoot responses are possible mechanisms to explain Vigour 18's superior growth. Vigorous genotypes may present a new opportunity for increased productivity with conservation farming.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Roots in unploughed soil were three times more distorted than roots in ploughed soil.

Treatment
unploughed soile1
Outcome
distortede1
Direction
three times moree1
Value
three timese1
Comparator
ploughed soile1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Conventional wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars grow slowly in unploughed soil because of physical and biological constraints”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–129 · show in text ↑
e1

“Roots of both genotypes in unploughed soil were three times more distorted with 30% shorter apices and 60% shorter expansion zones than roots in ploughed soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 331–489 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root apices in unploughed soil were 30% shorter than in ploughed soil.

Treatment
unploughed soile1
Outcome
apicese1
Direction
shortere1
Value
30%e1
Comparator
ploughed soile1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Conventional wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars grow slowly in unploughed soil because of physical and biological constraints”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–129 · show in text ↑
e1

“Roots of both genotypes in unploughed soil were three times more distorted with 30% shorter apices and 60% shorter expansion zones than roots in ploughed soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 331–489 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root expansion zones in unploughed soil were 60% shorter than in ploughed soil.

Treatment
unploughed soile1
Outcome
expansion zonese1
Direction
shortere1
Value
60%e1
Comparator
ploughed soile1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Conventional wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars grow slowly in unploughed soil because of physical and biological constraints”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–129 · show in text ↑
e1

“Roots of both genotypes in unploughed soil were three times more distorted with 30% shorter apices and 60% shorter expansion zones than roots in ploughed soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 331–489 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

More than half of the root length contacted dead, remnant roots.

Outcome
root lengthe2
Value
More than halfe2
Qualifier
contacted dead, remnant rootse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Conventional wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars grow slowly in unploughed soil because of physical and biological constraints”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–129 · show in text ↑
e2

“More than half the root length contacted dead, remnant roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–640 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vigour 18 roots grew 39% faster than Janz roots in unploughed soil.

Material
Vigour 18e3
Treatment
unploughed soile3
Outcome
roots grewe3
Direction
fastere3
Value
39%e3
Comparator
Janze3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Conventional wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars grow slowly in unploughed soil because of physical and biological constraints”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–129 · show in text ↑
e3

“Vigour 18 roots grew 39% faster, were thicker and distorted less than Janz roots in unploughed soil, but developed similarly in ploughed soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 642–783 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vigour 18 roots were thicker than Janz roots in unploughed soil.

Material
Vigour 18e3
Treatment
unploughed soile3
Outcome
rootse3
Direction
thickere3
Comparator
Janze3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Conventional wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars grow slowly in unploughed soil because of physical and biological constraints”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–129 · show in text ↑
e3

“Vigour 18 roots grew 39% faster, were thicker and distorted less than Janz roots in unploughed soil, but developed similarly in ploughed soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 642–783 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vigour 18 roots were distorted less than Janz roots in unploughed soil.

Material
Vigour 18e3
Treatment
unploughed soile3
Outcome
distortede3
Direction
lesse3
Comparator
Janze3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Conventional wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars grow slowly in unploughed soil because of physical and biological constraints”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–129 · show in text ↑
e3

“Vigour 18 roots grew 39% faster, were thicker and distorted less than Janz roots in unploughed soil, but developed similarly in ploughed soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 642–783 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vigour 18 roots developed similarly to Janz roots in ploughed soil.

Material
Vigour 18e3
Treatment
ploughed soile3
Outcome
developede3
Direction
no_changeinferrede3
Comparator
Janze3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Conventional wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars grow slowly in unploughed soil because of physical and biological constraints”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–129 · show in text ↑
e3

“Vigour 18 roots grew 39% faster, were thicker and distorted less than Janz roots in unploughed soil, but developed similarly in ploughed soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 642–783 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vigour 18 shoots grew 64% faster in unploughed soil.

Material
Vigour 18e4
Treatment
unploughed soile4
Outcome
shoots grewe4
Direction
fastere4
Value
64%e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Conventional wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars grow slowly in unploughed soil because of physical and biological constraints”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–129 · show in text ↑
e4

“Vigour 18 shoots grew 64% faster in unploughed soil, but 15% faster in ploughed soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–869 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vigour 18 shoots grew 15% faster in ploughed soil.

Material
Vigour 18e4
Treatment
ploughed soile4
Outcome
shoots grewe4
Direction
fastere4
Value
15%e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Conventional wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars grow slowly in unploughed soil because of physical and biological constraints”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–129 · show in text ↑
e4

“Vigour 18 shoots grew 64% faster in unploughed soil, but 15% faster in ploughed soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–869 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fumigation of unploughed soil improved the growth of Janz.

Material
Janze5
Treatment
Fumigation of unploughed soile5
Outcome
growthe5
Direction
improvede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Conventional wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars grow slowly in unploughed soil because of physical and biological constraints”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–129 · show in text ↑
e5

“Fumigation of unploughed soil improved the growth of Janz only”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 871–933 · show in text ↑

solarization · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 18 positive, 6 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.