Paper · 1971 · Crop Science

Heterosis and Combining Ability Estimates in F2 Flax Populations as Influenced by Plant Density1

A. H. Shehata; V. E. Comstock

10
claims
19
verbatim quotes
12
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Seed yield, its three components (bolls per unit area, seed size, and seeds per boll), oil content, and iodine value were studied in F 2 populations of a diallel cross among nine cultivars of flax ( Linum usitatissimum L.) at two locations and three plant densities. Average heterosis for yield in F 2 was 6% relative to the midparent values. Four F 2 populations exceeded in yield the high‐yielding parent by 15 to 19%. One F 2 population, ‘Russian’ ✕ C.I. 1664, exceeded by 5.5% the yield of ‘Marine’, the highest yielding cultivar. Varying plant density did not affect the magnitude of heterosis, mean oil percentage, iodine value, nor the estimates of combining ability. Plant density did have a significant effect on mean yields and on the yield components, and showed a significant interaction with genotypes for yield and bolls per unit area. In spite of the latter interaction, seven of the 36 F 2 populations were among the highest 25% in yield in all three densities. The interactions of locations with genotypes were significant for most characters, which suggests that more than one test location should be used to evaluate hybrid flax populations. General combining ability effects were significant and much larger for all characters than were specific combining ability effects at all densities.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Average F2 yield heterosis was 6% over midparent values.

Outcome
heterosis for yielde0
Value
6%e0
Comparator
midparent valuese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Average heterosis for yield in F 2 was 6% relative to the midparent values.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 267–342 · show in text ↑
t0

“Flax”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–52 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four F2 populations yielded 15 to 19% above the high yielding parent.

Outcome
yielde0
Direction
exceedede0
Value
15 to 19%e0
Comparator
high‐yielding parente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Four F 2 populations exceeded in yield the high‐yielding parent by 15 to 19%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 343–420 · show in text ↑
t0

“Flax”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–52 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Russian × C.I. 1664 yielded 5.5% more than Marine.

Material
‘Russian’ ✕ C.I. 1664e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
exceedede0
Value
5.5%e0
Comparator
‘Marine’e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“One F 2 population, ‘Russian’ ✕ C.I. 1664, exceeded by 5.5% the yield of ‘Marine’, the highest yielding cultivar.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 421–534 · show in text ↑
t0

“Flax”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant density did not alter heterosis, oil percentage, iodine value or combining ability estimates.

Treatment
Varying plant densitye0
Outcome
magnitude of heterosis, mean oil percentage, iodine value, nor the estimates of combining abilitye0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Varying plant density did not affect the magnitude of heterosis, mean oil percentage, iodine value, nor the estimates of combining ability.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–674 · show in text ↑
t0

“Flax”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant density significantly affected mean yield and yield components.

Treatment
Plant densitye0
Outcome
mean yields and on the yield componentse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plant density did have a significant effect on mean yields and on the yield components”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–761 · show in text ↑
t0

“Flax”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–52 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant density interacted significantly with genotype for yield and bolls per unit area.

Material
genotypese0
Outcome
yield and bolls per unit areae0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“showed a significant interaction with genotypes for yield and bolls per unit area.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 767–849 · show in text ↑
t0

“Flax”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–52 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seven of 36 F2 populations ranked in the highest yield quartile at all densities.

Outcome
highest 25% in yielde0
Value
seven of the 36 F 2 populationse0
Qualifier
all three densitiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seven of the 36 F 2 populations were among the highest 25% in yield in all three densities.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 886–977 · show in text ↑
t0

“Flax”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–52 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Location by genotype interactions were significant for most characters.

Material
genotypese0
Outcome
most characterse0
Setting
locationse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The interactions of locations with genotypes were significant for most characters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1059 · show in text ↑
t0

“Flax”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–52 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend multiple locations for evaluating hybrid flax populations.

Outcome
more than one test location should be used to evaluate hybrid flax populationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“more than one test location should be used to evaluate hybrid flax populations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1081–1160 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

General combining ability effects were significant and larger than specific combining ability for all characters at all densities.

Outcome
General combining ability effectse0
Direction
much largere0
Qualifier
all characters than were specific combining ability effects at all densitiese0
Comparator
specific combining ability effectse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“General combining ability effects were significant and much larger for all characters than were specific combining ability effects at all densities.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1161–1309 · show in text ↑
t0

“Flax”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–52 · show in text ↑

density · quality: oil · Linum usitatissimum (flax)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 4 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.