Paper · 2013 · Agricultural Sciences

Rootstocks effect on plant nutrition concentration in different organ of grafted watermelon

Halit Yetisir; A. Erhan Özdemir; Veysel Aras; et al.

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
17
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

In this study carried out in 2009 and 2010 growing seasons, effect of rootstocks on plant nutrition partitioning in grafted watermelon onto four gourd rootstocks was investigated. Ferro, RS841 (Cucurbita maxima x C. moschata) and Argentario and Macis (Lagenaria hybrid) were used as rootstocks. Crimson Tide and Crisby watermelon cultivars were used as scion. Grafted and ungrafted seedlings were produced by a commercial seedling company. Plants were grafted by one cotyledon grafting techniques. Experiment was conducted in Alata Horticultural Research Station inMersin. The grafted plants were planted under low tunnel in early spring and regular cultural practices for watermelon were applied. Plant nutrition concentrations were determined in leaf, fruit rind, fruit flesh and seeds. Leaf sample was taken at flowering stage, rind, flesh and seed sample were taken from fully mature fruit. Nitrogen concentration was determined by modified Kjheldahl methods. Phosphorous concentration was determined by vanadomolybdophosphoric acid method. K, Ca, Mg, Fe, Mn, Zn and Cu concentration of samples were determined by atomic absorption spectrophotometry. Plant nutrient concentration in leaf, rind, flesh and seed were significantly affected by rootstocks. Increase in concentration of N, P, K, Ca and Mg in leaves was not observed in grafted plant. Ungrafted plant had higher concentration of Fe, Mn, Zn and Cu in their leaves. Ca concentration in rind of fruits from grafted watermelon was higher than ungrafted control plant except Crimson Tide/Macis and Crimson Tide/Argentario graft combinations. Plant nutrition content of fruit flesh was significantly affected by rootstocks and scion. Magnesium, Fe, Zn and Mn concentration of seed was not significantly influenced by rootstocks and scion while other plant nutrient content was significantly affected rootstocks and scion.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rootstocks significantly affected nutrient concentration in leaf, rind, flesh and seed.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
rootstockse0
Outcome
Plant nutrient concentration in leaf, rind, flesh and seede0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plant nutrient concentration in leaf, rind, flesh and seed were significantly affected by rootstocks.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1155–1256 · show in text ↑
t0

“watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafting did not increase leaf N, P, K, Ca or Mg concentrations.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
grafted plante0
Outcome
concentration of N, P, K, Ca and Mg in leavese0
Direction
not observede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increase in concentration of N, P, K, Ca and Mg in leaves was not observed in grafted plant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1257–1349 · show in text ↑
t0

“watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ungrafted plants had higher leaf Fe, Mn and Zn concentrations.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
Ungrafted plante0
Outcome
concentration of Fe, Mn, Zne0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ungrafted plant had higher concentration of Fe, Mn, Zn and Cu in their leaves.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1350–1428 · show in text ↑
t0

“watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ungrafted plants had higher leaf Cu concentration.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
Ungrafted plante0
Outcome
Cu in their leavese0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ungrafted plant had higher concentration of Fe, Mn, Zn and Cu in their leaves.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1350–1428 · show in text ↑
t0

“watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafting increased fruit rind Ca concentration except in Crimson Tide/Macis and Crimson Tide/Argentario combinations.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatuse0
Treatment
grafted watermelone0
Outcome
Ca concentration in rind of fruitse0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
except Crimson Tide/Macis and Crimson Tide/Argentario graft combinationse0
Comparator
ungrafted control plante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ca concentration in rind of fruits from grafted watermelon was higher than ungrafted control plant except Crimson Tide/Macis and Crimson Tide/Argentario graft combinations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1429–1601 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rootstocks and scions significantly affected fruit flesh nutrient content.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
rootstocks and scione0
Outcome
Plant nutrition content of fruit fleshe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plant nutrition content of fruit flesh was significantly affected by rootstocks and scion.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1602–1692 · show in text ↑
t0

“watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rootstock and scion did not significantly influence seed Mg, Fe and Zn concentrations.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
rootstocks and scione0
Outcome
Magnesium, Fe, Zne0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Magnesium, Fe, Zn and Mn concentration of seed was not significantly influenced by rootstocks and scion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1693–1796 · show in text ↑
t0

“watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rootstock and scion did not significantly influence seed Mn concentration.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
rootstocks and scione0
Outcome
Mn concentration of seede0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Magnesium, Fe, Zn and Mn concentration of seed was not significantly influenced by rootstocks and scion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1693–1796 · show in text ↑
t0

“watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Other seed nutrient contents were significantly affected by rootstock and scion.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
rootstocks and scione0
Outcome
other plant nutrient contente0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“other plant nutrient content was significantly affected rootstocks and scion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1803–1879 · show in text ↑
t0

“watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–91 · show in text ↑

grafting · nutrient: content · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 8 positive, 3 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. no effect

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.