Paper · 2000 · Phytopathology

Host Diversity Can Reduce Potato Late Blight Severity for Focal and General Patterns of Primary Inoculum

K. A. Garrett; C. C. Mundt

5
claims
19
verbatim quotes
77
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT The use of host diversity as a tool for management of potato late blight has not been viewed as promising in the past. But the increasing importance of late blight internationally has brought new consideration to all potential management tools. We studied the effect of host diversity on epidemics of potato late blight in Oregon, where there was little outside inoculum. The experimental system consisted of susceptible potato cv. Red LaSoda and a highly resistant breeding selection, inoculated with local isolates of US-8 Phytophthora infestans. Potatoes were grown in single-genotype plots and also in a mixture of 10 susceptible and 26 resistant potato plants. Half of the plots received inoculation evenly throughout the plot (general inoculation) and half received an equal quantity of inoculum in only one corner of the plot (focal inoculation). The area under the disease progress curve (AUDPC) was greater in single genotype stands of susceptible cv. Red LaSoda inoculated throughout the plot than with stands inoculated in one focus. The host-diversity effect on foliar late blight was significant in both years of the investigation; the AUDPC was reduced by an average of 37% in 1997 and 36% in 1998, compared with the mean disease level for the potato genotypes grown separately. Though the evidence for influence of inoculum pattern on host-diversity effects was weak (P = 0.15), in both years there was a trend toward greater host-diversity effects for general inoculation. Statistical significance of host-diversity effects on tuber yield and blight were found only in one of the two years. In that year, tuber yield from both the resistant and susceptible cultivar was increased in mixtures compared with single genotype stands and tuber blight was decreased in mixtures for susceptible cv. Red LaSoda.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

A mixture of susceptible and resistant potato plants reduced AUDPC of late blight by 37% in 1997 and 36% in 1998 relative to genotypes grown separately.

Treatment
a mixture of 10 susceptible and 26 resistant potato plantse3
Interactor
Phytophthora infestansPhytophthora infestanse2pathogen
Outcome
AUDPCe6
Direction
reducede6
Value
37% in 1997 and 36% in 1998e6
Comparator
potato genotypes grown separatelye6
Setting
Oregone1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phytophthora infestans
Phytophthora infestans · InteractorHoward F. Schwartz, Colorado State University, United States · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Host Diversity Can Reduce Potato Late Blight Severity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–53 · show in text ↑
e1

“We studied the effect of host diversity on epidemics of potato late blight in Oregon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 254–338 · show in text ↑
e2

“inoculated with local isolates of US-8 Phytophthora infestans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–556 · show in text ↑
e3

“a mixture of 10 susceptible and 26 resistant potato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 615–673 · show in text ↑
e6

“The host-diversity effect on foliar late blight was significant in both years of the investigation; the AUDPC was reduced by an average of 37% in 1997 and 36% in 1998, compared with the mean disease level for the potato genotypes grown separately.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1054–1301 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

General inoculation gave a non-significant trend toward greater host-diversity effects than focal inoculation.

Treatment
general inoculatione7
Interactor
Phytophthora infestansPhytophthora infestanse2pathogen
Outcome
host-diversity effectse7
Direction
greatere7
Qualifier
weak (P = 0.15)e7
Comparator
focal inoculatione4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phytophthora infestans
Phytophthora infestans · InteractorHoward F. Schwartz, Colorado State University, United States · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Host Diversity Can Reduce Potato Late Blight Severity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–53 · show in text ↑
e2

“inoculated with local isolates of US-8 Phytophthora infestans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–556 · show in text ↑
e4

“in only one corner of the plot (focal inoculation)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–861 · show in text ↑
e7

“Though the evidence for influence of inoculum pattern on host-diversity effects was weak (P = 0.15), in both years there was a trend toward greater host-diversity effects for general inoculation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1302–1497 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In one of the two years, tuber yield of both cultivars was increased in mixtures compared with single genotype stands.

Material
resistant and susceptible cultivare1
Treatment
mixturese1
Outcome
tuber yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Qualifier
only in one of the two yearse0
Comparator
single genotype standse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Host Diversity Can Reduce Potato Late Blight Severity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–53 · show in text ↑
e0

“Statistical significance of host-diversity effects on tuber yield and blight were found only in one of the two years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1498–1614 · show in text ↑
e1

“In that year, tuber yield from both the resistant and susceptible cultivar was increased in mixtures compared with single genotype stands and tuber blight was decreased in mixtures for susceptible cv. Red LaSoda”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1616–1827 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In one of the two years, tuber blight of the susceptible cultivar was decreased in mixtures compared with single genotype stands.

Material
susceptible cv. Red LaSodae1
Treatment
mixturese1
Interactor
Phytophthora infestansPhytophthora infestanse2pathogen
Outcome
tuber blighte1
Direction
decreasede1
Qualifier
only in one of the two yearse0
Comparator
single genotype standse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phytophthora infestans
Phytophthora infestans · InteractorHoward F. Schwartz, Colorado State University, United States · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Host Diversity Can Reduce Potato Late Blight Severity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–53 · show in text ↑
e2

“inoculated with local isolates of US-8 Phytophthora infestans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–556 · show in text ↑
e0

“Statistical significance of host-diversity effects on tuber yield and blight were found only in one of the two years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1498–1614 · show in text ↑
e1

“In that year, tuber yield from both the resistant and susceptible cultivar was increased in mixtures compared with single genotype stands and tuber blight was decreased in mixtures for susceptible cv. Red LaSoda”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1616–1827 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AUDPC of late blight was greater in susceptible single-genotype stands inoculated throughout the plot than in stands inoculated in one focus.

Material
susceptible cv. Red LaSodae5
Treatment
inoculated throughout the plote5
Interactor
Phytophthora infestansPhytophthora infestanse2pathogen
Outcome
AUDPCe5
Direction
greatere5
Comparator
inoculated in one focuse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phytophthora infestans
Phytophthora infestans · InteractorHoward F. Schwartz, Colorado State University, United States · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Host Diversity Can Reduce Potato Late Blight Severity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–53 · show in text ↑
e2

“inoculated with local isolates of US-8 Phytophthora infestans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–556 · show in text ↑
e5

“The area under the disease progress curve (AUDPC) was greater in single genotype stands of susceptible cv. Red LaSoda inoculated throughout the plot than with stands inoculated in one focus.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 863–1053 · show in text ↑

inoculation · Phytophthora infestans · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 24 positive, 16 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.