Paper · 1977 · Soil Science Society of America Journal

The Critical Zn 2+ Concentration for Corn and the Nonabsorption of Chelated Zinc

A. D. Halvorson; W. L. Lindsay

7
claims
12
verbatim quotes
95
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Corn ( Zea mays ) was grown in nutrient solutions of pH 5.2 and 7.5 with EDTA (ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid) and DTPA (diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid) as chelating agents. At pH 5.2, corn plants were healthy and fully green, but at pH 7.5, the nutrient solutions with DTPA produced severely stunted, Zn‐deficient plants. Spraying the foliage with Zn or increasing the level of ZnSO 4 added to the nutrient solution prevented Zn deficiency. A concentration of 10 −10.6 M Zn 2+ was sufficient to prevent Zn deficiency with corn. Even at 10 5 times this concentration, chelated Zn was not absorbed by the roots. Equilibrium relationships of chelating agents in hydroponic solutions were extremely helpful in interpreting the results of this study. The findings reported herein support the hypothesis that Zn 2+ is the form of Zn absorbed by plant roots. Furthermore, plants can obtain adequate Zn from a nutrient media when Zn 2+ is maintained at approximately 10 −10.6 M . This concentration is nearly 4,000 times lower than the 10 −7 M reported by Carroll and Loneragan. The hypothesis proposed herein is that chelation aids in the transport and movement of metal ions to plant roots, but only Zn 2+ is absorbed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At pH 5.2, corn plants were healthy and green.

Outcome
healthy and fully greene0
Qualifier
pH 5.2e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At pH 5.2, corn plants were healthy and fully green”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 188–239 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At pH 7.5, DTPA solutions produced stunted zinc-deficient corn plants.

Treatment
nutrient solutions with DTPAe0
Outcome
severely stunted, Zn‐deficient plantse0
Qualifier
pH 7.5e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at pH 7.5, the nutrient solutions with DTPA produced severely stunted, Zn‐deficient plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–335 · show in text ↑
e1

“Corn ( Zea mays )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–26 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar zinc prevented zinc deficiency in corn.

Treatment
Spraying the foliage with Zne0
Outcome
Zn deficiencye0
Direction
preventede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spraying the foliage with Zn or increasing the level of ZnSO 4 added to the nutrient solution prevented Zn deficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 337–454 · show in text ↑
e1

“Corn ( Zea mays )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–26 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing ZnSO 4 in nutrient solution prevented zinc deficiency in corn.

Treatment
increasing the level of ZnSO 4 added to the nutrient solutione0
Outcome
Zn deficiencye0
Direction
preventede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spraying the foliage with Zn or increasing the level of ZnSO 4 added to the nutrient solution prevented Zn deficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 337–454 · show in text ↑
e1

“Corn ( Zea mays )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–26 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A Zn 2+ concentration of 10 −10.6 M prevented corn zinc deficiency.

Outcome
Zn deficiencye0
Direction
prevente0
Value
10 −10.6 Me0
Qualifier
sufficiente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A concentration of 10 −10.6 M Zn 2+ was sufficient to prevent Zn deficiency with corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 456–541 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn roots did not absorb chelated zinc even at 10 5 times the sufficient concentration.

Outcome
chelated Zn was not absorbed by the rootse0
Value
10 5 times this concentratione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Even at 10 5 times this concentration, chelated Zn was not absorbed by the roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 543–623 · show in text ↑
e1

“Corn ( Zea mays )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–26 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The findings support Zn 2+ as the zinc form absorbed by corn roots.

Compound
Zn 2+e0
Outcome
form of Zn absorbed by plant rootse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Zn 2+ is the form of Zn absorbed by plant roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–865 · show in text ↑
e1

“Corn ( Zea mays )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–26 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

235 papers: 199 positive, 36 negative or no effect

198 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

231 papers more in this group

See all 235 papers →

zinc sulfate · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

46 papers: 41 positive, 5 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

161 papers: 151 positive, 10 negative or no effect

150 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

157 papers more in this group

See all 161 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,164 papers: 1,026 positive, 138 negative or no effect

1,025 papers in the same direction as this paper · 127 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

1,160 papers more in this group

See all 1,164 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.