Paper · 1997 · Journal of the Japanese Society for Horticultural Science

Effects of Fertigation Scheduling on Water Relations of Tomato Plants Grown in Peat Bags and Rockwool Slabs.

Hui-lian Xu; Laurent Gauthier; Pierre-Andre Dube; et al.

13
claims
26
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Greenhouse tomato plants (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. cv. Capello) were grown in peat bags and rockwool slabs to examine the effects of varying the electrical conductivity (EC) of the nutrient solution and substrate matric water potential (Ψsub) on plant water rela- tions. EC of the nutrient solution delivered to peat bags varied between 1 to 4 dS•m-1 with Ψsub of either-5 kPa or-9 kPa as the setpoint for starting the irrigation. The EC variations were adjusted automatically by a computer system according to potential eva- potranspiration (PET), which was calculated from radiation and vapor pressure deficit. Plants in rockwool slabs were treated with three EC levels, 2.5, 4.0 and 5.5 dS•m-1. Plants in both peat bags and rockwool slabs were overwatered once a week to leach accumulated salts out of the substrates. Before plants were overwatered, leaf water potential (ΨL) was lower in the plants treated with high EC and low Ψsub, but turgor potential (P) was maintained close to the control value. This was attributed to the osmo- tic adjustment caused mainly by the active solute accumulation. After plants under high EC or low Ψsub were overwatered, ΨL recovered to the control level, and P became high- er because of the lower osmotic potential (π) than in the control plants. At a given ΨL, the plants under variable EC, high EC, and low Ψsub maintained higher leaf relative wa- ter content (ζ). These leaves had high turgid water content, high symplasmic (osmotically active) water content, low apoplasmic (osmotically inactive) watger content and low ζ at the point of zero turgor (incipient plasmolysis). EC variations in peat bags according to PET caused osmotic adjustment and turgor regulation although the extent was small. Maintenance of P after overwatering was directly proportional to stomatal conductance and photsynthetic rate. Our results suggested that tomato plants adjusted their internal water status and compartment of tissue water in symplasmic and apoplasmic fractions in response to high EC and low Ψsub and that varying EC together with overwatering plants once a week not only reduced salinity stress but also favored turgor maintenance.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Before overwatering, tomato plants treated with high EC and low substrate matric water potential had lower leaf water potential.

Treatment
high EC and low Ψsube0
Outcome
leaf water potential (ΨL)e0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–62 · show in text ↑
e0

“Before plants were overwatered, leaf water potential (ΨL) was lower in the plants treated with high EC and low Ψsub”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 826–941 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Before overwatering, turgor potential of tomato plants under high EC and low Ψsub was maintained close to the control value.

Treatment
high EC and low Ψsube0
Outcome
turgor potential (P)e0
Direction
maintained close toe0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–62 · show in text ↑
e0

“Before plants were overwatered, leaf water potential (ΨL) was lower in the plants treated with high EC and low Ψsub, but turgor potential (P) was maintained close to the control value”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 826–1009 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After overwatering, leaf water potential of tomato plants under high EC or low Ψsub recovered to the control level.

Treatment
high EC or low Ψsube0
Outcome
ΨLe0
Direction
recoverede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–62 · show in text ↑
e0

“After plants under high EC or low Ψsub were overwatered, ΨL recovered to the control level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1108–1198 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After overwatering, turgor potential of tomato plants under high EC or low Ψsub became higher than in control plants, because of a lower osmotic potential.

Treatment
high EC or low Ψsube0
Outcome
Pe0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Qualifier
lower osmotic potential (π)e0
Comparator
control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–62 · show in text ↑
e0

“After plants under high EC or low Ψsub were overwatered, ΨL recovered to the control level, and P became high- er because of the lower osmotic potential (π) than in the control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1108–1291 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The maintained turgor potential was attributed to osmotic adjustment caused mainly by active solute accumulation.

Outcome
osmo- tic adjustmente0
Qualifier
active solute accumulatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–62 · show in text ↑
e0

“This was attributed to the osmo- tic adjustment caused mainly by the active solute accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1011–1106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At a given leaf water potential, tomato plants under variable EC, high EC and low Ψsub maintained higher leaf relative water content.

Treatment
variable EC, high EC, and low Ψsube0
Outcome
leaf relative wa- ter content (ζ)e0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–62 · show in text ↑
e0

“At a given ΨL, the plants under variable EC, high EC, and low Ψsub maintained higher leaf relative wa- ter content (ζ)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1293–1411 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaves of these plants had high turgid water content and high symplasmic water content.

Outcome
turgid water content, high symplasmic (osmotically active) water contente0
Direction
highe0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–62 · show in text ↑
e0

“These leaves had high turgid water content, high symplasmic (osmotically active) water content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1413–1507 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaves of these plants had low apoplasmic water content and low relative water content at the point of zero turgor.

Outcome
apoplasmic (osmotically inactive) watger content and low ζ at the point of zero turgore0
Direction
lowe0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–62 · show in text ↑
e0

“low apoplasmic (osmotically inactive) watger content and low ζ at the point of zero turgor (incipient plasmolysis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1509–1623 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

EC variations in peat bags according to PET caused osmotic adjustment and turgor regulation in tomato, although the extent was small.

Treatment
EC variations in peat bags according to PETe0
Outcome
osmotic adjustment and turgor regulatione0
Qualifier
extent was smalle0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–62 · show in text ↑
e0

“EC variations in peat bags according to PET caused osmotic adjustment and turgor regulation although the extent was small”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1625–1746 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maintenance of turgor potential after overwatering was directly proportional to stomatal conductance and photosynthetic rate.

Treatment
overwateringe0
Outcome
Maintenance of Pe0
Direction
directly proportionale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–62 · show in text ↑
e0

“Maintenance of P after overwatering was directly proportional to stomatal conductance and photsynthetic rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1748–1856 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest tomato plants adjusted their internal water status and tissue water compartments in response to high EC and low Ψsub.

Treatment
high EC and low Ψsube0
Outcome
internal water statuse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–62 · show in text ↑
e0

“tomato plants adjusted their internal water status and compartment of tissue water in symplasmic and apoplasmic fractions in response to high EC and low Ψsub”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1885–2042 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Varying EC together with weekly overwatering reduced salinity stress in tomato.

Treatment
varying EC together with overwatering plants once a weeke0
Outcome
salinity stresse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–62 · show in text ↑
e0

“varying EC together with overwatering plants once a week not only reduced salinity stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2052–2141 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Varying EC together with weekly overwatering favored turgor maintenance in tomato.

Treatment
varying EC together with overwatering plants once a weeke0
Outcome
turgor maintenancee0
Direction
favorede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–62 · show in text ↑
e0

“varying EC together with overwatering plants once a week not only reduced salinity stress but also favored turgor maintenance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2052–2177 · show in text ↑

growing medium · physiology: water · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.