Paper · 1987 · Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis

Fertigation of apples with nitrate or ammonium nitrogen under drip irrigation. I. tree performance

Isaac Klein; Gideon Spieler

8
claims
17
verbatim quotes
9
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The effect of fertigation with 128 kg/ha of N of various fertilizer sources, containing 0, 50 or 100% ammonium ions, on apple (cv. ‘Anna') performance was studied in a field experiment under drip irrigation. Growth, yield, leaf and fruit mineral analysis and fruit size and maturity were measured throughout the experiment, which lasted for 7 years. The fertilizer source containing nitrate only (0% NH4 +) increased yield by 15% and growth by 10–14% as compared with fertilizers containing 50 or 100% NH4 +. The effect of the N form on yield was thought to be mediated through enhanced growth by higher nitrate concentration in the soil, rather than via growth inhibition by the ammonium ions, since only traces of NH4 + could be detected in the soil solution. The N form or the phosphate carrier of the 100% NH4 + source fertilizer, had no consistent effect on the mineral composition of the leaf and fruit, or on acidity, total soluble solids (TSS) and pressure of the fruit.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrate-only fertilizer increased apple yield by 15% relative to fertilizers containing 50 or 100% ammonium.

Material
‘Anna'e1
Treatment
fertilizer source containing nitrate only (0% NH4 +)e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
15%e0
Comparator
fertilizers containing 50 or 100% NH4 +e0
Setting
field experimente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fertilizer source containing nitrate only (0% NH4 +) increased yield by 15% and growth by 10–14% as compared with fertilizers containing 50 or 100% NH4 +.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 359–517 · show in text ↑
e1

“apple (cv. ‘Anna')”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 129–147 · show in text ↑
e2

“a field experiment under drip irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 175–215 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrate-only fertilizer increased apple growth by 10–14% relative to fertilizers containing 50 or 100% ammonium.

Material
‘Anna'e1
Treatment
fertilizer source containing nitrate only (0% NH4 +)e0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
10–14%e0
Comparator
fertilizers containing 50 or 100% NH4 +e0
Setting
field experimente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fertilizer source containing nitrate only (0% NH4 +) increased yield by 15% and growth by 10–14% as compared with fertilizers containing 50 or 100% NH4 +.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 359–517 · show in text ↑
e1

“apple (cv. ‘Anna')”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 129–147 · show in text ↑
e2

“a field experiment under drip irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 175–215 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors attributed the nitrogen-form effect on apple yield to nitrate-enhanced growth rather than ammonium inhibition.

Compound
nitratee0
Outcome
yielde0
Qualifier
was thought to be mediated through enhanced growth by higher nitrate concentration in the soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of the N form on yield was thought to be mediated through enhanced growth by higher nitrate concentration in the soil, rather than via growth inhibition by the ammonium ions, since only traces of NH4 + could be detected in the soil solution.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 518–770 · show in text ↑
e1

“apple (cv. ‘Anna')”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 129–147 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Only traces of ammonium were detected in the soil solution.

Outcome
NH4 +e0
Value
tracese0
Qualifier
soil solutione0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“only traces of NH4 + could be detected in the soil solution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–769 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen form had no consistent effect on apple leaf and fruit mineral composition.

Treatment
N forme0
Outcome
mineral composition of the leaf and fruite0
Direction
no consistent effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The N form or the phosphate carrier of the 100% NH4 + source fertilizer, had no consistent effect on the mineral composition of the leaf and fruit, or on acidity, total soluble solids (TSS) and pressure of the fruit.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 771–987 · show in text ↑
e1

“apple (cv. ‘Anna')”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 129–147 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The phosphate carrier of the ammonium fertilizer had no consistent effect on apple leaf and fruit mineral composition.

Treatment
phosphate carrier of the 100% NH4 + source fertilizere0
Outcome
mineral composition of the leaf and fruite0
Direction
no consistent effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The N form or the phosphate carrier of the 100% NH4 + source fertilizer, had no consistent effect on the mineral composition of the leaf and fruit, or on acidity, total soluble solids (TSS) and pressure of the fruit.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 771–987 · show in text ↑
e1

“apple (cv. ‘Anna')”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 129–147 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen form had no consistent effect on apple fruit acidity, soluble solids or pressure.

Treatment
N forme0
Outcome
acidity, total soluble solids (TSS) and pressure of the fruite0
Direction
no consistent effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The N form or the phosphate carrier of the 100% NH4 + source fertilizer, had no consistent effect on the mineral composition of the leaf and fruit, or on acidity, total soluble solids (TSS) and pressure of the fruit.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 771–987 · show in text ↑
e1

“apple (cv. ‘Anna')”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 129–147 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The phosphate carrier of the ammonium fertilizer had no consistent effect on apple fruit acidity, soluble solids or pressure.

Treatment
phosphate carrier of the 100% NH4 + source fertilizere0
Outcome
acidity, total soluble solids (TSS) and pressure of the fruite0
Direction
no consistent effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The N form or the phosphate carrier of the 100% NH4 + source fertilizer, had no consistent effect on the mineral composition of the leaf and fruit, or on acidity, total soluble solids (TSS) and pressure of the fruit.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 771–987 · show in text ↑
e1

“apple (cv. ‘Anna')”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 129–147 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

67 papers: 52 positive, 15 negative or no effect

51 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

63 papers more in this group

See all 67 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

69 papers: 52 positive, 17 negative or no effect

51 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

65 papers more in this group

See all 69 papers →

fertilization · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

106 papers: 90 positive, 16 negative or no effect

89 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

102 papers more in this group

See all 106 papers →

fertilization · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

178 papers: 150 positive, 28 negative or no effect

149 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

174 papers more in this group

See all 178 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.