Paper · 1973 · Agronomy Journal

Quantitative Soil Moisture Use in Corn Grown Under Conventional and No‐tillage Methods1

Jerry D. Hill; R. L. Blevins

4
claims
9
verbatim quotes
21
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Experiments conducted at the University of Kentucky during 1969, 1970, and 1971 compared corn ( Zea mays L.) production under conventional and no‐tillage systems. The presence of a killed‐sod mulch in the no‐tillage plots almost eliminated the loss of moisture by direct evaporation from the soil surface during the early growing period, but after a full crop canopy had developed, losses from both production methods were about equal. Water loss from the soil during the full‐canopy period was compared with open pan evaporation to determine the rate of loss under varying levels of soil moisture deficiency. The average soil moisture deficiency during the period from about 3 weeks before to 6 weeks after silking was related to final grain yield, and a simple linear relationship indicated that each additional cm of water available to the plant increased yields by about 559 kg/ha. The relationship was tested on regional yield data for the years 1954 to 1968. Soil moisture status was simulated from precipitation and temperature data observed during the growing season by using the Palmer Crop Moisture Index method. The variation in predicted and observed yield follow each other very well, with a linear correlation coefficient of 0.81.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In corn, the killed-sod mulch in no-tillage plots almost eliminated direct evaporation loss of moisture from the soil surface during the early growing period compared with conventional tillage.

Treatment
killed‐sod mulch in the no‐tillage plotse0
Outcome
loss of moisture by direct evaporation from the soil surfacee0
Direction
almost eliminatede0
Qualifier
during the early growing periode0
Comparator
conventionale1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The presence of a killed‐sod mulch in the no‐tillage plots almost eliminated the loss of moisture by direct evaporation from the soil surface during the early growing period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 172–345 · show in text ↑
e1

“conventional and no‐tillage systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–170 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After a full crop canopy had developed, soil moisture losses from the conventional and no-tillage production methods in corn were about equal.

Treatment
no‐tillagee1
Outcome
lossese0
Direction
about equale0
Qualifier
after a full crop canopy had developede0
Comparator
conventionale1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but after a full crop canopy had developed, losses from both production methods were about equal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 347–443 · show in text ↑
e1

“conventional and no‐tillage systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–170 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–38 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In corn, each additional cm of water available to the plant (lower soil moisture deficiency from about 3 weeks before to 6 weeks after silking) increased grain yield by about 559 kg/ha in a simple linear relationship.

Treatment
additional cm of water available to the plante0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
559 kg/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“each additional cm of water available to the plant increased yields by about 559 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–893 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–38 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Corn yield predicted from Palmer Crop Moisture Index simulated soil moisture and observed regional yield data (1954 to 1968) followed each other closely, with a linear correlation coefficient of 0.81.

Outcome
linear correlation coefficiente0
Value
0.81e0
Comparator
observed yielde0

Verbatim

e0

“The variation in predicted and observed yield follow each other very well, with a linear correlation coefficient of 0.81”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1132–1252 · show in text ↑

mulching · soil: physics · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

112 papers: 97 positive, 15 negative or no effect

96 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

108 papers more in this group

See all 112 papers →

tillage · soil: physics · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

152 papers: 124 positive, 28 negative or no effect

123 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

148 papers more in this group

See all 152 papers →

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

286 papers in the same direction as this paper · 812 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.