Paper · 2008 · Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science

Chlorophyll Stability is an Indicator of Drought Tolerance in Peanut

A. Arunyanark; S. Jogloy; C. Akkasaeng; et al.

14
claims
28
verbatim quotes
203
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Chlorophyll stability during drought might be a promising criterion for selection for drought resistance in peanut. The study describes two field trials conducted at Khon Kaen University, Thailand which investigate genotype × drought interactions in a wide range of peanut germplasm in general and assess the relationship between chlorophyll stability and genotypic performance in particular, under drought. Two field experiments (during 2003/2004 and 2004/2005 dry seasons) were conducted in a split plot design with three water regimes [field capacity, 2/3 available water (AW) and 1/3 AW] as main, and 12 peanut genotypes as subtreatments, replicated four times. Observations on total dry matter (TDM), chlorophyll density (ChlD) (chlorophyll content per unit leaf area), chlorophyll content (chlorophyll content per plant) and SPAD chlorophyll meter readings (SCMR) were recorded at 30, 60 and 90 days after emergence. Transpiration (T) and transpiration efficiency (TE) were computed using the data on amount of water input and TDM. Drought stress significantly reduced TDM, T and chlorophyll content across genotypes but significantly increased TE and ChlD in peanut. However, there were significant differences among genotypes for TE and chlorophyll parameters. The genotype × drought interaction effects for chlorophyll characters (content and density) were not significant suggesting a strong genetic effect. The correlation coefficients between TDM and chlorophyll content (r = 0.51, P = 0.01 to r = 0.91, P = 0.01) and between TE and ChlD (r = 0.46, P = 0.05 to r = 0.77, P = 0.01) were positive and significant. These findings suggest that chlorophyll parameters are strongly linked with drought tolerance in peanut. There were highly significant and positive relationships between ChlD and SCMR (r = 0.67, P = 0.01 to r = 0.93, P = 0.01), between SCMR and TE (r = 0.41, P = 0.05 to r = 0.80, P = 0.01) suggesting that SCMR could be used as a tool for rapid assessment of relative chlorophyll status in peanut genotypes as well as for the indirect selection of drought tolerance in peanut.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought significantly reduced total dry matter in peanut.

Treatment
Drought stresse0
Outcome
TDMe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought stress significantly reduced TDM, T and chlorophyll content across genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1131 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought significantly reduced transpiration in peanut.

Treatment
Drought stresse0
Outcome
Transpiration (T)e1
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought stress significantly reduced TDM, T and chlorophyll content across genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1131 · show in text ↑
e1

“Transpiration (T)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–949 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought significantly reduced chlorophyll content in peanut.

Treatment
Drought stresse0
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought stress significantly reduced TDM, T and chlorophyll content across genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1131 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought significantly increased transpiration efficiency in peanut.

Treatment
Drought stresse0
Outcome
transpiration efficiency (TE)e1
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought stress significantly reduced TDM, T and chlorophyll content across genotypes but significantly increased TE and ChlD in peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1181 · show in text ↑
e1

“transpiration efficiency (TE)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 954–983 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought significantly increased chlorophyll density in peanut.

Treatment
Drought stresse0
Outcome
chlorophyll density (ChlD)e1
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought stress significantly reduced TDM, T and chlorophyll content across genotypes but significantly increased TE and ChlD in peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1181 · show in text ↑
e1

“chlorophyll density (ChlD)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 715–741 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Peanut genotypes differed significantly in transpiration efficiency and chlorophyll parameters.

Material
genotypese0
Outcome
TE and chlorophyll parameterse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there were significant differences among genotypes for TE and chlorophyll parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1192–1276 · show in text ↑
t0

“peanut”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 62–68 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotype by drought interactions for chlorophyll content and density were not significant.

Material
genotypee0
Treatment
droughte0
Outcome
chlorophyll characters (content and density)e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The genotype × drought interaction effects for chlorophyll characters (content and density) were not significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1278–1390 · show in text ↑
t0

“peanut”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 62–68 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Total dry matter and chlorophyll content correlated positively and significantly, with r values from 0.51 to 0.91.

Compound
chlorophylle0
Outcome
TDMe0
Direction
positivee0
Value
r = 0.51, P = 0.01 to r = 0.91, P = 0.01e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The correlation coefficients between TDM and chlorophyll content (r = 0.51, P = 0.01 to r = 0.91, P = 0.01) and between TE and ChlD (r = 0.46, P = 0.05 to r = 0.77, P = 0.01) were positive and significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1427–1631 · show in text ↑
t0

“peanut”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 62–68 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Transpiration efficiency and chlorophyll density correlated positively and significantly, with r values from 0.46 to 0.77.

Compound
chlorophyll density (ChlD)e1
Outcome
TEe0
Direction
positivee0
Value
r = 0.46, P = 0.05 to r = 0.77, P = 0.01e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“between TE and ChlD (r = 0.46, P = 0.05 to r = 0.77, P = 0.01) were positive and significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1539–1631 · show in text ↑
e1

“chlorophyll density (ChlD)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 715–741 · show in text ↑
t0

“peanut”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 62–68 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll density and SPAD readings were positively and significantly related, with r values from 0.67 to 0.93.

Compound
ChlDe0
Outcome
SCMRe0
Direction
positivee0
Value
r = 0.67, P = 0.01 to r = 0.93, P = 0.01e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“positive relationships between ChlD and SCMR (r = 0.67, P = 0.01 to r = 0.93, P = 0.01)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1772–1859 · show in text ↑
t0

“peanut”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 62–68 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SPAD readings and transpiration efficiency were positively and significantly related, with r values from 0.41 to 0.80.

Outcome
TEe0
Direction
positivee1
Value
r = 0.41, P = 0.05 to r = 0.80, P = 0.01e0
Comparator
SCMRe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“between SCMR and TE (r = 0.41, P = 0.05 to r = 0.80, P = 0.01)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1861–1923 · show in text ↑
e1

“highly significant and positive relationships”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1749–1794 · show in text ↑
t0

“peanut”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 62–68 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest chlorophyll parameters are linked with drought tolerance in peanut.

Compound
chlorophylle0
Outcome
drought tolerancee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chlorophyll parameters are strongly linked with drought tolerance in peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1661–1736 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest SPAD readings can rapidly assess relative chlorophyll status in peanut genotypes.

Outcome
relative chlorophyll statuse0
Qualifier
SCMRe0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SCMR could be used as a tool for rapid assessment of relative chlorophyll status in peanut genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1940–2040 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest SPAD readings can support indirect selection for drought tolerance in peanut.

Outcome
indirect selection of drought tolerancee0
Qualifier
SCMRe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SCMR could be used as a tool for rapid assessment of relative chlorophyll status in peanut genotypes as well as for the indirect selection of drought tolerance in peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1940–2109 · show in text ↑

drought · physiology: pigments · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ

13 papers: 5 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

drought · growth · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ

58 papers: 20 positive, 38 negative or no effect

37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

54 papers more in this group

See all 58 papers →

drought · physiology: gas exchange · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 1 positive, 8 negative or no effect

8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.