Paper · 2006 · Pest Management Science

Use of crop residues for the control of Meloidogyne incognita under laboratory conditions

Ana PiedraBuena; Avelino García‐Álvarez; Miguel Á Díez‐Rojo; et al.

7
claims
7
verbatim quotes
25
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This laboratory study evaluates the biofumigant effect of different organic materials with the aim of developing non-chemical alternatives for the management of Meloidogyne incognita (Kofoid & White) Chitwood populations. Sources of organic material from the production system were selected with the aim of reducing agricultural residue accumulation problems as well as decreasing the costs due to the use of chemical fertilizers and pesticides. The selected materials were residues from pepper, strawberry, tomato and cucumber crops, orange juice industry residues, commercial manure and sheep manure, applied at different dosages. Two biofumigation assays were performed under laboratory conditions, using alkaline soils from the Torreblanca area (Murcia, Spain) and acidic soils from the Villa del Prado area (Madrid, Spain). The assays evaluated the effect of the treatments on M. incognita juveniles and other soil organisms, the nematode galling index on tomato roots (susceptible cv. Marmande) grown in the biofumigated soil and soil fertility parameters. The results showed that all biofumigant materials significantly decreased M. incognita populations and galling indices in tomato cv. Marmande. A greater effect was observed on galling indices when applying crop residues together with manure than with the residues alone. Biofumigation had a general beneficial effect on soil fertility, generally increasing nitrogen, organic carbon, pH and potassium levels, and also calcium levels when crop residues of pepper and strawberry were applied. There were no important variations in the number of saprophagous nematodes, dorylaimids and enchytraeids.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All biofumigant materials significantly decreased Meloidogyne incognita populations in the laboratory soil assays.

Treatment
biofumigant materialse0
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pest
Outcome
M. incognita populationse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all biofumigant materials significantly decreased M. incognita populations and galling indices in tomato cv. Marmande”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1204 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All biofumigant materials significantly decreased nematode galling indices on tomato cv. Marmande.

Material
cv. Marmandee1
Treatment
biofumigant materialse1
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae1pest
Outcome
galling indicese1
Direction
decreasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“all biofumigant materials significantly decreased M. incognita populations and galling indices in tomato cv. Marmande”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1204 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A greater effect on galling indices was observed when crop residues were applied together with manure than with the residues alone.

Treatment
crop residues together with manuree2
Outcome
galling indicese2
Direction
greater effecte2
Comparator
the residues alonee2

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e2

“A greater effect was observed on galling indices when applying crop residues together with manure than with the residues alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1206–1332 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofumigation generally increased soil nitrogen, organic carbon and pH.

Treatment
Biofumigatione3
Outcome
nitrogen, organic carbon, pHe3
Direction
increasinge3

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e3

“Biofumigation had a general beneficial effect on soil fertility, generally increasing nitrogen, organic carbon, pH and potassium levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1334–1469 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofumigation generally increased soil potassium levels.

Treatment
Biofumigatione4
Outcome
potassium levelse4
Direction
increasinge4

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e4

“Biofumigation had a general beneficial effect on soil fertility, generally increasing nitrogen, organic carbon, pH and potassium levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1334–1469 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil calcium levels also increased when crop residues of pepper and strawberry were applied.

Treatment
crop residues of pepper and strawberrye5
Outcome
calcium levelse5

Not reportedTaxonComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e5

“also calcium levels when crop residues of pepper and strawberry were applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1475–1551 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

There were no important variations in the numbers of saprophagous nematodes, dorylaimids and enchytraeids after biofumigation.

Outcome
number of saprophagous nematodes, dorylaimids and enchytraeidse6
Direction
no important variationse6

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e6

“There were no important variations in the number of saprophagous nematodes, dorylaimids and enchytraeids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1553–1657 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

organic · nutrient: content · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 19 positive, 4 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

fertilization · pest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

48 papers: 38 positive, 10 negative or no effect

37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

44 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

organic · pest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.