Paper · 1996 · Crop Science

Supplemental Nitrogen Effects on Alfalfa Regrowth and Nitrogen Mobilization from Roots

L. D. Barber; B. C. Joern; J. J. Volenec; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
56
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Recent studies suggest that alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.) root carbohydrate concentrations are not correlated closely with shoot regrowth, and that root N reserves may influence shoot regrowth after harvest. The objectives of this greenhouse study were to (i) determine the effects of supplemental N on alfalfa regrowth and N uptake, (ii) quantify N remobilization from roots to regrowing shoots, and (iii) determine if certain root N pools, including vegetative storage proteins (VSPs), were utilized preferentially as N sources during early shoot regrowth. Four cultivars with contrasting fall dormancy reaction were defoliated and supplied with 85 mg N (kg soil) −1 as 15 N‐enriched (NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 or KNO 3 . Samples were taken immediately and once weekly for 28 d. After 28 d, plants were again defoliated and shoots, crowns, and roots of one‐half of the plants sampled immediately. Intact crowns and roots of remaining plants were transplanted into sand, and shoots, crowns, and roots sampled 10 d after transplanting. Taproot N from these samples was partitioned into four specific pools. Nitrate‐N uptake was greater than NH 4 ‐N uptake at 7 and 28 d after N application. Ten days after transplanting, 25% of crown and root total N and 35% of crown and root 15 N was remobilized to regrowing shoots. Fifty‐five percent of total root N was soluble in phosphate buffer. The buffer‐soluble N pool was fractionated into a low molecular weight N pool (≈30% of total root N), a non‐VSP protein N pool (≈20% of total root N), and a VSP‐enriched protein N pool (≈5% of total root N). The low molecular weight N and VSP‐enriched protein N pools in roots were utilized preferentially as N sources for regrowing shoots 10 d after transplanting. Accumulation of these root N pools may be important for rapid early shoot regrowth after defoliation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrate nitrogen uptake exceeded ammonium nitrogen uptake at 7 and 28 days.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae1
Treatment
Nitrate‐Ne0
Outcome
uptakee0
Direction
greatere0
Qualifier
at 7 and 28 d after N applicatione0
Comparator
NH 4 ‐Ne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrate‐N uptake was greater than NH 4 ‐N uptake at 7 and 28 d after N application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1095–1178 · show in text ↑
e1

“alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 28–57 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A quarter of crown and root total nitrogen was remobilized to regrowing shoots after transplanting.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae1
Organ / stage
regrowing shootse0
Outcome
crown and root total Ne0
Value
25%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ten days after transplanting, 25% of crown and root total N and 35% of crown and root 15 N was remobilized to regrowing shoots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1179–1306 · show in text ↑
e1

“alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 28–57 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thirty-five percent of crown and root labeled nitrogen was remobilized after transplanting.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae1
Organ / stage
regrowing shootse0
Outcome
crown and root 15 Ne0
Value
35%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ten days after transplanting, 25% of crown and root total N and 35% of crown and root 15 N was remobilized to regrowing shoots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1179–1306 · show in text ↑
e1

“alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 28–57 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fifty-five percent of root nitrogen was phosphate-buffer soluble.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae1
Organ / stage
roote0
Outcome
total root N was soluble in phosphate buffere0
Value
Fifty‐five percente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fifty‐five percent of total root N was soluble in phosphate buffer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1307–1374 · show in text ↑
e1

“alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 28–57 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The low molecular weight pool represented about 30% of total root nitrogen.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae1
Outcome
low molecular weight N poole0
Value
≈30% of total root Ne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a low molecular weight N pool (≈30% of total root N)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1423–1475 · show in text ↑
e1

“alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 28–57 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The non-VSP protein pool represented about 20% of total root nitrogen.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae1
Outcome
non‐VSP protein N poole0
Value
≈20% of total root Ne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a non‐VSP protein N pool (≈20% of total root N)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1477–1524 · show in text ↑
e1

“alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 28–57 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The VSP enriched pool represented about 5% of total root nitrogen.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae1
Outcome
VSP‐enriched protein N poole0
Value
≈5% of total root Ne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a VSP‐enriched protein N pool (≈5% of total root N)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1530–1581 · show in text ↑
e1

“alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 28–57 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low molecular weight root nitrogen was preferentially used for regrowing shoots.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae1
Organ / stage
regrowing shootse0
Outcome
low molecular weight Ne0
Qualifier
10 d after transplantinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The low molecular weight N and VSP‐enriched protein N pools in roots were utilized preferentially as N sources for regrowing shoots 10 d after transplanting.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1583–1740 · show in text ↑
e1

“alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 28–57 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The VSP enriched root protein pool was preferentially used for regrowing shoots.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae1
Organ / stage
regrowing shootse0
Outcome
VSP‐enriched protein N poolse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The low molecular weight N and VSP‐enriched protein N pools in roots were utilized preferentially as N sources for regrowing shoots 10 d after transplanting.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1583–1740 · show in text ↑
e1

“alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 28–57 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Accumulation of these root nitrogen pools may support rapid early shoot regrowth.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae1
Outcome
rapid early shoot regrowthe0
Qualifier
Accumulation of these root N poolse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Accumulation of these root N pools may be important for rapid early shoot regrowth after defoliation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1741–1842 · show in text ↑
e1

“alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 28–57 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 18 positive, 4 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.