Paper · 2008 · Biological Agriculture & Horticulture

Groundnut/Cassava/Maize Intercrop Yields over Three Cycles of Planted Tree Fallow/Crop Rotations on Ultisol in Southern Cameroon

S. Hauser

15
claims
16
verbatim quotes
3
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT Lack of crop yield response to planted tree fallow led to introducing a two-year fallow phase to determine if planted tree fallow can improve soil fertility and yields over a no-tree control. Three cycles of two years fallow followed by slash-and-burn land preparation and one year of groundnut/cassava/maize intercropping were conducted with Senna spectabilis, Flemingia macrophylla and Dactyladenia barteri as planted hedgerow fallows and a no-tree control on an Ultisol in southern Cameroon. The land had been continuously cropped to maize/cassava intercrop for 5 years previous to the first two-year fallow phase. Groundnut grain yields were unaffected by fallow system in 1998 and 2001 and the sum of the three cropping years. Maize grain yield was unaffected by fallow system in 1998. In 2001 and 2004 maize grain yield was highest in the S. spectabilis system. Total maize grain yield across the three cropping years was higher in the F. macrophylla and S. spectabilis systems than in the D. barteri system. Cassava root yields were in all years and the sum of the 3 years unaffected by fallow system. Cassava root (1998, 2001) and groundnut grain (2001) yields had significant spatial responses to the distance from hedgerows, with yield increases with increasing distance from hedgerows. Annual biomass production of hedgerow prunings during cropping phases ranged from zero (D. barteri) to 3.4 Mg ha−1 (S. spectabilis). During the growth of groundnut and maize, hedgerows produced < 1 Mg ha−1 in 1998, < 0.6 Mg ha in 2001 and <0.8 Mg ha at any individual pruning. Combined relative crop yields over the three cycles were lower in planted fallow than in the no-tree control. The N export with groundnut and maize grain and cassava roots, as an indicator of crude protein production was lower in the planted hedgerow fallow systems than in no-tree control. The planted fallow hedgerow system appears unsuitable to improve crop yields because the nutrient supply from prunings is low due to their low biomass production. Yet on short distances, the spatial response of cassava and groundnut indicates competition between hedgerows and crops, which was most pronounced on cassava and groundnut in the S. spectabilis system. The crop combination appears incompatible as benefits realized by the maize were outweighed by losses in groundnut.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Groundnut grain yield was unaffected by fallow system in 1998, 2001, and across three cropping years.

Taxon
GroundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Treatment
fallow systeme0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
unaffectede0
Qualifier
in 1998 and 2001 and the sum of the three cropping yearse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Groundnut grain yields were unaffected by fallow system in 1998 and 2001 and the sum of the three cropping years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 627–740 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize grain yield was unaffected by fallow system in 1998.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayse0
Treatment
fallow systeme0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
unaffectede0
Qualifier
in 1998e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maize grain yield was unaffected by fallow system in 1998.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–799 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize grain yield was highest in the Senna spectabilis fallow system in 2001 and 2004.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
S. spectabilis systeme0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
In 2001 and 2004e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 2001 and 2004 maize grain yield was highest in the S. spectabilis system.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–876 · show in text ↑
e1

“Senna spectabilis, Flemingia macrophylla and Dactyladenia barteri as planted hedgerow fallows”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 352–445 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total maize grain yield across three years was higher with Flemingia macrophylla fallow than with Dactyladenia barteri.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
F. macrophyllae0
Outcome
maize grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
D. barteri systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total maize grain yield across the three cropping years was higher in the F. macrophylla and S. spectabilis systems than in the D. barteri system.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 877–1023 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total maize grain yield across three years was higher with Senna spectabilis fallow than with Dactyladenia barteri.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
S. spectabilis systemse0
Outcome
maize grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
D. barteri systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total maize grain yield across the three cropping years was higher in the F. macrophylla and S. spectabilis systems than in the D. barteri system.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 877–1023 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cassava root yield was unaffected by fallow system in every year and across all three years.

Treatment
fallow systeme0
Outcome
root yieldse0
Direction
unaffectede0
Qualifier
in all years and the sum of the 3 yearse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cassava root yields were in all years and the sum of the 3 years unaffected by fallow system.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1117 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cassava root yield increased with distance from hedgerows in 1998 and 2001.

Outcome
roote0
Direction
yield increasese0
Qualifier
1998, 2001e0
Setting
distance from hedgerowse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cassava root (1998, 2001) and groundnut grain (2001) yields had significant spatial responses to the distance from hedgerows, with yield increases with increasing distance from hedgerows.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1118–1305 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Groundnut grain yield increased with distance from hedgerows in 2001.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Outcome
graine0
Direction
yield increasese0
Qualifier
2001e0
Setting
distance from hedgerowse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cassava root (1998, 2001) and groundnut grain (2001) yields had significant spatial responses to the distance from hedgerows, with yield increases with increasing distance from hedgerows.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1118–1305 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Annual hedgerow pruning biomass during cropping ranged from zero for Dactyladenia barteri to 3.4 Mg ha−1 for Senna spectabilis.

Taxon
D. barteriDactyladenia barterie0
Outcome
Annual biomass production of hedgerow pruningse0
Value
3.4 Mg ha−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dactyladenia barteri
Dactyladenia barteri · TaxonVijay Barve · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Annual biomass production of hedgerow prunings during cropping phases ranged from zero (D. barteri) to 3.4 Mg ha−1 (S. spectabilis).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1306–1438 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hedgerow biomass production during groundnut and maize growth was below 1 Mg ha−1 in 1998, below 0.6 Mg ha in 2001 and below 0.8 Mg ha per pruning.

Taxon
hedgerowse0
Outcome
hedgerows producede0
Value
< 1 Mg ha−1e0

Verbatim

e0

“During the growth of groundnut and maize, hedgerows produced < 1 Mg ha−1 in 1998, < 0.6 Mg ha in 2001 and <0.8 Mg ha at any individual pruning.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1439–1582 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined relative crop yield across cycles was lower in planted fallow than no-tree control.

Taxon
crope0
Treatment
planted fallowe0
Outcome
Combined relative crop yieldse0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
no-tree controle0

Verbatim

e0

“Combined relative crop yields over the three cycles were lower in planted fallow than in the no-tree control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1583–1692 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen export in grain and roots was lower with planted hedgerow fallows than no-tree control.

Taxon
groundnut and maize grain and cassava rootsArachis hypogaeaManihot esculentaZea mayse0
Treatment
planted hedgerow fallow systemse0
Outcome
N exporte0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
no-tree controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The N export with groundnut and maize grain and cassava roots, as an indicator of crude protein production was lower in the planted hedgerow fallow systems than in no-tree control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1693–1873 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The planted fallow hedgerow system was judged unsuitable for improving crop yields because pruning nutrient supply was low.

Taxon
crope0
Outcome
planted fallow hedgerow system appears unsuitable to improve crop yieldse0
Qualifier
nutrient supply from prunings is low due to their low biomass productione0

Verbatim

e0

“The planted fallow hedgerow system appears unsuitable to improve crop yields because the nutrient supply from prunings is low due to their low biomass production.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1874–2036 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spatial yield patterns suggest hedgerow competition with cassava and groundnut, strongest in the Senna spectabilis system.

Taxon
cassava and groundnutArachis hypogaeaManihot esculentae0
Outcome
spatial responsee0
Qualifier
competition between hedgerows and cropse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the spatial response of cassava and groundnut indicates competition between hedgerows and crops, which was most pronounced on cassava and groundnut in the S. spectabilis system.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2061–2238 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors judged the crop combination incompatible because maize benefits were outweighed by groundnut losses.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Outcome
crop combination appears incompatiblee0
Qualifier
benefits realized by the maize were outweighed by losses in groundnute0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The crop combination appears incompatible as benefits realized by the maize were outweighed by losses in groundnut.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2239–2354 · show in text ↑

rotation · yield · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

rotation · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

37 papers: 22 positive, 15 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

rotation · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

322 papers: 254 positive, 68 negative or no effect

67 papers in the same direction as this paper · 254 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

318 papers more in this group

See all 322 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.