Paper · 2008 · Photosynthetica

Comparison of effects of salt and alkali stresses on the growth and photosynthesis of wheat

C. W. Yang; P. Wang; C. Y. Li; et al.

10
claims
19
verbatim quotes
227
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The seedlings of wheat were treated by salt-stress (SS, molar ratio of NaCl: Na2SO4 = 1: 1) and alkali-stress (AS, molar ratio of NaHCO3: Na2CO3 = 1: 1). Relative growth rate (RGR), leaf area, and water content decreased with increasing salinity, and the extents of the reduction under AS were greater than those under SS. The contents of photosynthetic pigments did not decrease under SS, but increased at low salinity. On the contrary, the contents of photosynthetic pigments decreased sharply under AS with increasing salinity. Under SS, the changes of net photosynthetic rate (P N), stomatal conductance (g s), and transpiration rate (E) were similar and all varied in a single-peak curve with increasing salinity, and they were lower than those of control only at salinity over 150 mM. Under AS, P N, g s, and E decreased sharply with rising salinity. The decrease of g s might cause the obvious decreases of E and intercellular CO2 concentration, and the increase of water use efficiency under both stresses. The Na+ content and Na+/K+ ratio in shoot increased and the K+ content in shoot decreased under both stresses, and the changing extents under AS were greater than those under SS. Thus SS and AS are two distinctive stresses with different characters; the destructive effects of AS on the growth and photosynthesis of wheat are more severe than those under SS. High pH is the key feature of the AS that is different from SS. The buffer capacity is essentially the measure of high pH action on plant. The deposition of mineral elements and the intracellular unbalance of Na+ and K+ caused by the high pH at AS might be the reason of the decrease of P N and g s and of the destruction of photosynthetic pigments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative growth rate, leaf area and water content declined as salinity increased, more under alkali stress.

Treatment
ASe0
Outcome
Relative growth rate (RGR), leaf area, and water contente0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
SSe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Relative growth rate (RGR), leaf area, and water content decreased with increasing salinity, and the extents of the reduction under AS were greater than those under SS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 154–321 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Photosynthetic pigment content increased at low salinity under salt stress.

Treatment
SSe0
Outcome
contents of photosynthetic pigmentse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
low salinitye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The contents of photosynthetic pigments did not decrease under SS, but increased at low salinity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 323–419 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Photosynthetic pigment content fell sharply with rising salinity under alkali stress.

Treatment
ASe0
Outcome
contents of photosynthetic pigmentse0
Direction
decreased sharplye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the contents of photosynthetic pigments decreased sharply under AS with increasing salinity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 438–529 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–91 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Net photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance and transpiration rate followed a single peak with salinity under salt stress.

Treatment
SSe0
Outcome
net photosynthetic rate (P N), stomatal conductance (g s), and transpiration rate (E)e0
Direction
single-peak curvee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under SS, the changes of net photosynthetic rate (P N), stomatal conductance (g s), and transpiration rate (E) were similar and all varied in a single-peak curve with increasing salinity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 531–717 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

These gas exchange measures were below controls only above 150 mM under salt stress.

Treatment
salinity over 150 mMe0
Outcome
net photosynthetic rate (P N), stomatal conductance (g s), and transpiration rate (E)e0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under SS, the changes of net photosynthetic rate (P N), stomatal conductance (g s), and transpiration rate (E) were similar and all varied in a single-peak curve with increasing salinity, and they were lower than those of control only at salinity over 150 mM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 531–789 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Net photosynthetic rate, conductance and transpiration fell sharply with rising salinity under alkali stress.

Treatment
ASe0
Outcome
P N, g s, and Ee0
Direction
decreased sharplye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under AS, P N, g s, and E decreased sharply with rising salinity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–855 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot sodium content and sodium to potassium ratio increased under both stresses.

Treatment
both stressese0
Outcome
Na+ content and Na+/K+ ratio in shoote0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Na+ content and Na+/K+ ratio in shoot increased and the K+ content in shoot decreased under both stresses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1015–1124 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot potassium content decreased under both stresses.

Treatment
both stressese0
Outcome
K+ content in shoote0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Na+ content and Na+/K+ ratio in shoot increased and the K+ content in shoot decreased under both stresses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1015–1124 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mineral changes were greater under alkali than salt stress.

Treatment
ASe0
Outcome
changing extentse0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
SSe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the changing extents under AS were greater than those under SS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1130–1192 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alkali stress damaged wheat growth and photosynthesis more severely than salt stress.

Treatment
ASe0
Outcome
growth and photosynthesise0
Direction
more severee0
Comparator
SSe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the destructive effects of AS on the growth and photosynthesis of wheat are more severe than those under SS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1265–1372 · show in text ↑

salinity · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

100 papers: 11 positive, 89 negative or no effect

88 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

96 papers more in this group

See all 100 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.