Paper · 1985 · Canadian Journal of Plant Science

DELAYED SEEDING FOR WILD OAT CONTROL IN RAPESEED IN NORTHWEST ALBERTA

A. L. DARWENT; J. H. SMITH

7
claims
12
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In a 4-yr study, rapeseed (Brassica campestris L.) was seeded where wild oats (Avena fatua L.) had been controlled either by various delayed seeding procedures or by an early spring application of trifluralin at 1.1 kg a.i./ha. The trifluralin treatment provided the best wild oat control. However, allowing wild oats to grow to the two-leaf stage, destroying them with cultivation and then seeding rapeseed resulted in commercially acceptable control (70% or more) with little or no loss of crop yield. Postponing cultivation until the wild oats reached the three- to four-leaf stage provided control that was almost equivalent to that attained with cultivation at the two-leaf stage but resulted in reduced crop yields. Destruction of wild oat seedlings at the two-leaf stage by paraquat or glyphosate did not improve the level of control over that provided by cultivation.Key words: Oat (wild), delayed seeding, rapeseed, trifluralin

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trifluralin gave the best wild oat control.

Taxon
rapeseede1
Treatment
trifluralin treatmente0
Interactor
wild oatsAvenae1weed
Outcome
wild oat controle0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena
Avena · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Sendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The trifluralin treatment provided the best wild oat control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 228–289 · show in text ↑
e1

“rapeseed (Brassica campestris L.) was seeded where wild oats (Avena fatua L.) had been controlled”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 17–114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivating wild oats at the two-leaf stage before rapeseed seeding gave commercially acceptable control of at least 70%.

Taxon
rapeseede0
Treatment
destroying them with cultivation and then seeding rapeseede0
Interactor
wild oatsAvenae0weed
Outcome
commercially acceptable controle0
Direction
controle0
Value
70% or moree0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena
Avena · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Sendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“allowing wild oats to grow to the two-leaf stage, destroying them with cultivation and then seeding rapeseed resulted in commercially acceptable control (70% or more)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 299–465 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The two-leaf cultivation schedule caused little or no crop yield loss.

Taxon
rapeseede0
Treatment
destroying them with cultivation and then seeding rapeseede0
Interactor
wild oatsAvenae0weed
Outcome
crop yielde0
Direction
little or no losse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena
Avena · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Sendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“allowing wild oats to grow to the two-leaf stage, destroying them with cultivation and then seeding rapeseed resulted in commercially acceptable control (70% or more) with little or no loss of crop yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 299–503 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivating at the three- to four-leaf stage controlled wild oats almost as well as cultivation at the two-leaf stage.

Taxon
rapeseede1
Treatment
Postponing cultivation until the wild oats reached the three- to four-leaf stagee0
Interactor
wild oatsAvenae0weed
Outcome
controle0
Direction
almost equivalente0
Comparator
cultivation at the two-leaf stagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena
Avena · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Sendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Postponing cultivation until the wild oats reached the three- to four-leaf stage provided control that was almost equivalent to that attained with cultivation at the two-leaf stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 504–684 · show in text ↑
e1

“seeding rapeseed resulted in commercially acceptable control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 391–451 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivating at the three- to four-leaf stage reduced rapeseed yields.

Taxon
rapeseede1
Treatment
Postponing cultivation until the wild oats reached the three- to four-leaf stagee0
Interactor
wild oatsAvenae0weed
Outcome
crop yieldse0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
cultivation at the two-leaf stagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena
Avena · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Sendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Postponing cultivation until the wild oats reached the three- to four-leaf stage provided control that was almost equivalent to that attained with cultivation at the two-leaf stage but resulted in reduced crop yields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 504–721 · show in text ↑
e1

“seeding rapeseed resulted in commercially acceptable control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 391–451 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Paraquat destruction of wild oat seedlings at the two-leaf stage did not improve control over cultivation.

Taxon
rapeseede1
Treatment
paraquate0
Interactor
wild oate0weed
Outcome
level of controle0
Direction
did not improvee0
Comparator
cultivatione0

Verbatim

e0

“Destruction of wild oat seedlings at the two-leaf stage by paraquat or glyphosate did not improve the level of control over that provided by cultivation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 722–875 · show in text ↑
e1

“seeding rapeseed resulted in commercially acceptable control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 391–451 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate destruction of wild oat seedlings at the two-leaf stage did not improve control over cultivation.

Taxon
rapeseede1
Treatment
glyphosatee0
Interactor
wild oate0weed
Outcome
level of controle0
Direction
did not improvee0
Comparator
cultivatione0

Verbatim

e0

“Destruction of wild oat seedlings at the two-leaf stage by paraquat or glyphosate did not improve the level of control over that provided by cultivation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 722–875 · show in text ↑
e1

“seeding rapeseed resulted in commercially acceptable control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 391–451 · show in text ↑

paraquat · control · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

glyphosate · control · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.