Abstract
There is a growing interest in optimizing the positive effects of the association between Azospirillum bacteria and corn crop in order to reduce the use of nitrogen fertilizers. This study aimed to evaluate the inoculation efficiency of an A. brasilense-based commercial product in association with different rates of nitrogen fertilization in two corn genotypes. The experiment was arranged in a 2 x 2 x 5 factorial randomized block design, with four replications. The treatments consisted of two corn hybrids (30F53 and CD386); with and without inoculation with a commercial product based on A. brasilense and five nitrogen rates (0, 40, 80, 120 and 160 kg ha-1). The variables plant height, basal stem diameter, leaf area, shoot dry matter, leaf nitrogen content, length and diameter of the cob, weight of 100 grains and grain yield were evaluated. Inoculation with A. brasilense provided increases of 11 and 12% in leaf area and shoot dry matter, respectively. There were differences in the response of the corn hybrids for most variables and the increase in nitrogen supply provided increments in the growth and yield of corn.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Azospirillum inoculation increased corn leaf area by 11%.
- Taxon
- corn
Zea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- Inoculation with A. brasilensee0
- Interactor
- A. brasilense
Azospirillum brasilensee0symbiont - Outcome
- leaf areae0
- Direction
- increasese0
- Value
- 11 and 12%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Inoculation with A. brasilense provided increases of 11 and 12% in leaf area and shoot dry matter, respectively.”
t0“corn hybrids”
Claim · model-written summary
Azospirillum inoculation increased corn shoot dry matter by 12%.
- Taxon
- corn
Zea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- Inoculation with A. brasilensee0
- Interactor
- A. brasilense
Azospirillum brasilensee0symbiont - Outcome
- shoot dry mattere0
- Direction
- increasese0
- Value
- 12%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Inoculation with A. brasilense provided increases of 11 and 12% in leaf area and shoot dry matter, respectively.”
t0“corn hybrids”
Claim · model-written summary
Corn hybrids differed in their responses for most variables.
- Taxon
- corn
Zea mays subsp. mayse0
- Outcome
- response of the corn hybrids for most variablese0
- Direction
- differencese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“There were differences in the response of the corn hybrids for most variables”
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing nitrogen supply increased corn growth and yield.
- Taxon
- corn
Zea mays subsp. mayse0
- Treatment
- increase in nitrogen supplye0
- Outcome
- growth and yielde0
- Direction
- incrementse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the increase in nitrogen supply provided increments in the growth and yield of corn”
The same questions in other papers
Azospirillum brasilense · growth · Zea mays (maize)Results differ
40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- positive
45 papers more in this group
See all 49 papers →inoculation · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
634 papers in the same direction as this paper · 61 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- positive
- positive
695 papers more in this group
See all 699 papers →nitrogen · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
1,905 papers in the same direction as this paper · 234 in the opposite direction · 45 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- positive
- negative
2,181 papers more in this group
See all 2,185 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.