Paper · 2011 · Journal of Economic Entomology

Impact of Applying Edible Oils to Silk Channels on Ear Pests of Sweet Corn

Xinzhi Ni; Alton N. Sparks; David G. Riley; et al.

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The impact of applying edible oils to corn silks on ear-feeding insects in sweet corn, Zea mays L., production was evaluated in 2006 and 2007. Six edible oils used in this experiment were canola, corn, olive, peanut, sesame, and soybean. Water and two commercial insecticidal oils (Neemix neem oil and nC21 Sunspray Ultrafine, a horticultural mineral oil) were used as the controls for the experiment. Six parameters evaluated in this experiment were corn earworm [Helicoverpa zea (Boddie) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)] damage rating, the number of sap beetle [Carpophilus spp. (Coleoptera: Nitidulidae)] adults and larvae, the number of corn silk fly (or picture-winged fly) (Diptera: Ulidiidae) larvae, common smut [Ustilago maydis (D.C.) Corda] infection rate, and corn husk coverage. Among the two control treatments, neem oil reduced corn earworm damage at both pre- and postpollination applications in 2006, but not in 2007, whereas the mineral oil applied at postpollination treatments reduced corn earworm damage in both years. The mineral oil also reduced the number of sap beetle adults, whereas the neem oil applied at postpollination attracted the most sap beetle adults in 2007. Among the six edible oil treatments, the corn and sesame oils applied at postpollination reduced corn earworm damage only in 2007. The application of the peanut oil at postpollination attracted more sap beetle adults in 2006, and more sap beetle larvae in 2007. Olive and neem oils significantly reduced husk coverage compared with the water control in both years. The mineral oil application consistently increased smut infection rate in both 2006 and 2007. Ramifications of using oil treatments in ear pest management also are discussed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem oil reduced corn earworm damage in sweet corn at both pre- and postpollination applications in 2006.

Taxon
Sweet Cornt0
Treatment
neem oile0
Interactor
corn earwormHelicoverpa zeae0pest
Outcome
corn earworm damagee0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
at both pre- and postpollination applications in 2006e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helicoverpa zea
Helicoverpa zea · InteractorAndy Reago & Chrissy McClarren · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“neem oil reduced corn earworm damage at both pre- and postpollination applications in 2006, but not in 2007”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–925 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem oil did not reduce corn earworm damage in sweet corn in 2007.

Taxon
Sweet Cornt0
Treatment
neem oile0
Interactor
corn earwormHelicoverpa zeae0pest
Outcome
corn earworm damagee0
Direction
no_changeinferrede0
Qualifier
not in 2007e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helicoverpa zea
Helicoverpa zea · InteractorAndy Reago & Chrissy McClarren · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“neem oil reduced corn earworm damage at both pre- and postpollination applications in 2006, but not in 2007”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–925 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mineral oil applied at postpollination reduced corn earworm damage in sweet corn in both years.

Taxon
Sweet Cornt0
Treatment
mineral oil applied at postpollinatione0
Interactor
corn earwormHelicoverpa zeae0pest
Outcome
corn earworm damagee0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
in both yearse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helicoverpa zea
Helicoverpa zea · InteractorAndy Reago & Chrissy McClarren · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the mineral oil applied at postpollination treatments reduced corn earworm damage in both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–1030 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mineral oil reduced the number of sap beetle adults in sweet corn.

Taxon
Sweet Cornt0
Treatment
mineral oile0
Interactor
sap beetlee0pest
Outcome
number of sap beetle adultse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The mineral oil also reduced the number of sap beetle adults”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1092 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem oil applied at postpollination attracted the most sap beetle adults in sweet corn in 2007.

Taxon
Sweet Cornt0
Treatment
neem oil applied at postpollinatione0
Interactor
sap beetlee0pest
Outcome
sap beetle adultse0
Direction
attracted the moste0
Qualifier
in 2007e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the neem oil applied at postpollination attracted the most sap beetle adults in 2007”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1102–1186 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn oil applied at postpollination reduced corn earworm damage in sweet corn only in 2007.

Taxon
Sweet Cornt0
Treatment
corne0
Interactor
corn earwormHelicoverpa zeae0pest
Outcome
corn earworm damagee0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
only in 2007e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helicoverpa zea
Helicoverpa zea · InteractorAndy Reago & Chrissy McClarren · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the corn and sesame oils applied at postpollination reduced corn earworm damage only in 2007”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1225–1317 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sesame oil applied at postpollination reduced corn earworm damage in sweet corn only in 2007.

Taxon
Sweet Cornt0
Treatment
sesame oils applied at postpollinatione0
Interactor
corn earwormHelicoverpa zeae0pest
Outcome
corn earworm damagee0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
only in 2007e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helicoverpa zea
Helicoverpa zea · InteractorAndy Reago & Chrissy McClarren · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the corn and sesame oils applied at postpollination reduced corn earworm damage only in 2007”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1225–1317 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peanut oil applied at postpollination attracted more sap beetle adults in sweet corn in 2006.

Taxon
Sweet Cornt0
Treatment
peanut oil at postpollinatione0
Interactor
sap beetlee0pest
Outcome
sap beetle adultse0
Direction
moree0
Qualifier
in 2006e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The application of the peanut oil at postpollination attracted more sap beetle adults in 2006, and more sap beetle larvae in 2007”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1319–1448 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peanut oil applied at postpollination attracted more sap beetle larvae in sweet corn in 2007.

Taxon
Sweet Cornt0
Treatment
peanut oil at postpollinatione0
Interactor
sap beetlee0pest
Outcome
sap beetle larvaee0
Direction
moree0
Qualifier
in 2007e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The application of the peanut oil at postpollination attracted more sap beetle adults in 2006, and more sap beetle larvae in 2007”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1319–1448 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Olive oil significantly reduced husk coverage compared with the water control in both years.

Taxon
Sweet Cornt0
Treatment
Olivee0
Outcome
husk coveragee0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
in both yearse0
Comparator
water controle0

Verbatim

e0

“Olive and neem oils significantly reduced husk coverage compared with the water control in both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1450–1551 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem oil significantly reduced husk coverage compared with the water control in both years.

Taxon
Sweet Cornt0
Treatment
neem oilse0
Outcome
husk coveragee0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
in both yearse0
Comparator
water controle0

Verbatim

e0

“Olive and neem oils significantly reduced husk coverage compared with the water control in both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1450–1551 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mineral oil application consistently increased smut infection rate in sweet corn in both 2006 and 2007.

Taxon
Sweet Cornt0
Treatment
mineral oil applicatione0
Interactor
smute0pathogen
Outcome
smut infection ratee0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
in both 2006 and 2007e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The mineral oil application consistently increased smut infection rate in both 2006 and 2007”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1553–1645 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–74 · show in text ↑

Arachis hypogaea · pest · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Zea mays subsp. mays · Helicoverpa zea · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 11 positive, 6 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

botanical · pest · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

90 papers: 78 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 78 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

86 papers more in this group

See all 90 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.